The Real Deal New York

Posts Tagged ‘edward normand’

  • Rushmore legal fight nears finale

    September 27, 2011 02:20PM

    alternate<br /></a>text
    Clockwise from top left: Extell Development President Gary Barnett, the Rushmore and Carlyle Group co-founder William Conway
    Attorney General Eric Schneiderman’s office faced off with lawyers
    representing Extell Development and Carlyle Realty Partners yesterday as
    a Manhattan Supreme Court judge heard what may be the final arguments
    in a long-running effort to overturn a $16 million escrow dispute at the
    Rushmore condominium.

    Judge Anil Singh was urged to overturn the April 2010 ruling by former
    AG Andrew Cuomo, who ordered the developers to refund $16 million
    in deposits to 41 buyers at the luxury condo building at 80 Riverside
    Boulevard close to 64th Street.

    The case centers on whether the developers missed a Sept. 1, 2008 deadline
    to close the first sale at the 289-unit building, or whether a scrivener’s
    error in the offering plan mistakenly included the wrong date, which the
    developers insist should have been Sept. 1, 2009, giving them a one-year
    window to finish construction and close the first deal. [more]

    Comments
  • alternate textThe Rushmore and Gary Barnett, head of Extell

    In a last minute and stunning move, the developers of the Upper West Side’s Rushmore condominium filed a federal lawsuit yesterday against state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo seeking to reverse his April rescission order to refund more than $16 million in escrow funds to buyers.

    The developers, Extell Development and Carlyle Realty Partners, operating under the name CRP/Extell, also filed a motion in U.S. District Court seeking a temporary restraining order that would block the release of the funds, which include down payments for more than $110 million worth of apartments.

    The developers expanded on their previous claims by arguing that a drafting attorney committed a typo or “scrivener’s error,” and claimed that Cuomo’s office failed to allow them to collect evidence or cross-examine the condo buyers on their true motivations for filing the claims, which CRP/Extell claims were to negotiate lower prices in a down market. [more]

    Comments