The Real Deal New York

Posts Tagged ‘homebuyer tax credit’

  • The extremely tight residential rental market in Manhattan may be having a positive impact on sales in Brooklyn. Home sales activity in the Borough of Trees skyrocketed and the median home price showed significant gains, according to a third-quarter market report released today by residential brokerage Prudential Douglas Elliman.

    “Brooklyn is showing signs of firm growth,” said Jonathan Miller, CEO of appraisal firm Miller Samuel and preparer of the report. “The key driver of that growth this quarter is the condo market, which I think is benefiting from the high rents in Manhattan combined with the falling interest rates.”

    Overall, there were 2,219 sales in Brooklyn during the third quarter, 18.1 percent greater than the number of sales in third quarter of 2010. Simultaneously, median sales price in the third quarter rose 5 percent from the prior-year quarter to $510,000. The growth in those two categories denotes a healthy market, Miller said. [more]

  • U.S. home prices began to stabilize in April after months of declines, according to a report yesterday from CoreLogic. Home prices increased on a month-to-month basis by 0.7 percent between March and April, the first increase since the first-time homebuyer tax credit expired in mid-2010.

    “While the economic recovery is still fragile and one data point is not a trend,” said Mark Fleming, chief economist for CoreLogic, “the month-over-month increase based on April sales activity is a positive sign. “[It] provides reason for cautious optimism.” [more]

  • As the effects of lender-imposed foreclosure freezes wear off, an increase in sales of distressed homes in the coming months is likely to put additional downward pressure on U.S. home prices, foreclosure-tracking firm RealtyTrac said in a 2010 sales report today. In total, 831,574 foreclosed U.S. homes sold to third parties last year, a 31 percent decline from 2009, RealtyTrac said. In New York, foreclosure sales also declined by 31 percent year-over-year. But the steep drop-off — a result both of the homebuyer tax credit’s expiration in the third quarter of 2010 and the foreclosure paperwork scandal in the fourth — isn’t likely to last. [more]

  • alternate text

    Thousands of taxpayers took advantage of the first-time homebuyer’s tax credit which expired last May. People who purchased a main residence between January 2009 and April 30, 2010 may have been eligible for a maximum tax credit of $8,000 for the first-time homebuyer and a $6,500 credit for the repeat homebuyer.

    This credit does not generally have to be repaid unless the home is disposed of or ceases to be a main residence within 36 months of the date of purchase.

    But for first-time homebuyers who purchased a home between April and December of 2008 and claimed a different federal tax credit, they are faced with a tax liability. [more]

  • Record-low mortgage interest rates helped to further stabilize the housing market over the past month, according to the latest “Housing Scorecard” released by the Obama Administration yesterday. While new and existing home sales stuck at lower levels than those seen prior to the expiration of the homebuyer tax credit, prices have stopped slipping after 33 consecutive months of declines, the report says, and in the second quarter of 2010, U.S. homeowners gained $95 billion worth of home equity. TRD [more]

  • Pending home sales are on the rise, according to the National Association of Realtors, which released its Pending Home Sales Index today for the month of August. The index climbed to 82.3, up 4.3 percent from July. But, despite this monthly improvement, August’s level still sat 20.1 percent below the same month a year earlier, showing that the market is far below historic levels, according to Lawrence Yun, chief economist with NAR. “The pace of a home sales recovery still depends more on job creation and an accompanying rise in consumer confidence,” Yun said. TRD

  • The federal homebuyer tax credit programs have been widely praised for stimulating real estate sales, but also reviled by critics who see the credits as a multibillion-dollar waste of the government’s money. 
    Now a new audit raises questions about the ability of the IRS to handle key basics of the programs, such as determining the year credit claimants actually purchased their houses, whether they have retained the property as a principal residence, and even if they were alive when a tax credit application was submitted in their name. 
    The audit by the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration praised the IRS for its recent efforts to develop a “comprehensive strategy” to keep track of the credit programs but identified deficiencies in a small but significant number of cases involving claims for credits. 
    For example, auditors found that the IRS has had trouble distinguishing between houses purchased during 2008 and those bought in 2009. This can be an important distinction since first-time purchasers in 2008 were limited to tax credits up to $7,500 that must be repaid annually over a 15-year period. By contrast, purchasers who opted to claim a revised version of the credit during 2009 — for up to $8,000 — were not subject to the annual repayment requirement. 
    Out of approximately 1.77 million credit filings during 2009, auditors said they identified 73,119 individual returns from taxpayers who received credits whose account records at the IRS had incorrect — or no — purchase dates: 
    – 59,802 recipients who purchased their homes in 2009 were incorrectly recorded by the IRS as having purchased during 2008, or no year was identified. 
    – 9,122 credit recipients actually bought their homes during 2008, but the IRS recorded the purchases as occurring in 2009. This could result in potential tax revenue losses to the government of nearly $31 million, auditors estimated, since these individuals might not be asked to repay the homebuyer credit over 15 years even though their 2008 purchase date required them to do so. 
    – 4,195 recipients’ claim forms had no purchase date stated or the purchase occurred prior to 2008. “These claims should not have been processed,” auditors said. 
    Beyond these claims, a total of 514,987 tax credit requests contained purchase dates that “cannot be verified” because the data were not “captured” by IRS computers. 
    The Treasury’s inspector general also focused on another set of problems: The IRS’ lack of systems to enforce the various “recapture” and “accelerated repayment” provisions that Congress included in the housing tax credit programs. 
    “Currently, the IRS does not have the ability to identify individuals” who received the homebuyer credit but subsequently may not retain the property as their principal residence — a key requirement imposed by Congress. For the $7,500 credit covering purchases made from April 9, 2008, through Jan. 30, 2009, recipients who sell the home before the end of the 15-year payback period are expected to repay the credit to the IRS “immediately” — on the tax filing for the year in which the home is sold. 
    In the case of the 2009-era credits — up to $8,000 for first-time buyers, $6,500 for qualified repeat purchasers — the credit must be repaid if the home is sold within three years of acquisition. The repayment is due on the taxpayer’s return filed in the year of the sale. Because the IRS has no systems in place to detect early sales or conversions of properties from principal residences, auditors said, it must rely on individuals to disclose such information voluntarily. The agency is now developing systems to keep track of repayment and recapture events using third-party sources of real estate and other data, said the report. 
    Auditors also found the IRS has no system at present to identify situations that allow certain taxpayers to bypass recapture rules, such as the death of the homeowner, foreclosures where there is no gain to the taxpayer, and extended overseas duty assignments of armed forces and other personnel that prevent them from occupying their houses. 
    Still another deficiency, auditors said, is IRS’ handling of homebuyer tax credit claims from applicants using the Social Security numbers of dead people. In the 2008 credit program, the audit identified 1,326 individuals who claimed a total of $10.1 million when the home purchase date occurred after the purported claimant’s date of death. 
    In 951 claims the individual whose Social Security number was used had been dead for at least half a year. The IRS denied 528 of the 1,326 total claims — worth about $4 million — but 798 claimants using dead persons’ Social Security identifications apparently received credits. The IRS has agreed to audit those 798 tax returns, according to the inspector general’s report. 
    Ken Harney is a real estate columnist with the Washington Post.

    [more]

  • Policy makers need to be more “inspirational” when designing solutions to the housing market crisis, according to Yale economist Robert Shiller, after whom the S&P’s Case-Shiller Home Price Index is named and which released its second quarter findings today. Shiller noted that it did not make sense to extend the homebuyer tax credit, and that the responses by the Bush and Obama administrations have amounted to “patches and bailouts,” he told the Wall Street Journal. Shiller believes that the solution lies in more “forward thinking” measures. One suggestion he offered was that mortgages should be indexed to inflation to allow for greater long-term certainty for borrowers. Another idea was that mortgage contracts in the future should include some kind of “preplanned workout,” detailing how a loan modification would proceed if the borrower fell behind on payments. Though the Obama administration has launched a debate on how to overhaul Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, it’s not clear how much that debate will focus on ideas like those suggested by Shiller. [WSJ]

    [more]

  • Policy makers need to be more “inspirational” when designing solutions to the housing market crisis, according to Yale economist Robert Shiller, after whom the S&P’s Case-Shiller Home Price Index is named and which released its second quarter findings today. Shiller noted that it did not make sense to extend the homebuyer tax credit, and that the responses by the Bush and Obama administrations have amounted to “patches and bailouts,” he told the Wall Street Journal. Shiller believes that the solution lies in more “forward thinking” measures. One suggestion he offered was that mortgages should be indexed to inflation to allow for greater long-term certainty for borrowers. Another idea was that mortgage contracts in the future should include some kind of “preplanned workout,” detailing how a loan modification would proceed if the borrower fell behind on payments. Though the Obama administration has launched a debate on how to overhaul Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, it’s not clear how much that debate will focus on ideas like those suggested by Shiller. [WSJ]

    [more]

  • Policy makers need to be more “inspirational” when designing solutions to the housing market crisis, according to Yale economist Robert Shiller, after whom the S&P’s Case-Shiller Home Price Index is named and which released its second quarter findings today. Shiller noted that it did not make sense to extend the homebuyer tax credit, and that the responses by the Bush and Obama administrations have amounted to “patches and bailouts,” he told the Wall Street Journal. Shiller believes that the solution lies in more “forward thinking” measures. One suggestion he offered was that mortgages should be indexed to inflation to allow for greater long-term certainty for borrowers. Another idea was that mortgage contracts in the future should include some kind of “preplanned workout,” detailing how a loan modification would proceed if the borrower fell behind on payments. Though the Obama administration has launched a debate on how to overhaul Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, it’s not clear how much that debate will focus on ideas like those suggested by Shiller. [WSJ]

    [more]