Bloomberg's development vision: A critical reading

October 28, 2009 02:30PM

alternate text
Mayor Bloomberg, a rendering of City Point
When Mayor Bloomberg first took office in 2002, he laid out a plan to incentivize developers so that New York would attract new companies in untapped neighborhoods. Nearly two terms, more than 100 rezoning measures, and $16 billion in financing for affordable housing and commercial development later, the New York Times said his development vision has been only partially successful. One reason, clearly, was the recession, which has resulted in stalled projects in places like Downtown Brooklyn, where developers of yet-to-materialize City Point project demolished a shopping mall only to leave the space vacant, so far. Others say Bloomberg's plan was designed for and driven by developers, rather than the public good. Some areas, though, like downtown Jamaica, Queens, have seen major economic revitalization under Bloomberg's watch. He has presided over the rezoning of one-fifth of the city, and his affordable housing program has allowed for more than 20,000 apartments for people earning less than 60 percent of the area's median income. Construction spending has doubled since he took office, according to the New York City Building Congress. Overall, rezoning may be Bloomberg's most significant development legacy, according to Jonathan Bowles, director of the Center for an Urban Future. Rezoned areas "are what will ultimately transform a large chunk of the city," he said. [NYT]


Comments

Anonymous

and there you have it from Jonathan "Bowling for Bloomberg Dollars" Bowles

Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 10/28/09

Anonymous

Bloomberg is responsible for the piece of junk architecture called Trump Soho, overdevelopment of NYC which resulted in overcrowded schools, Riverton Houses and Stuyvesant Town debacles, and more. He did little city planning and gave away NYC to all his rich developer friends like Jerry Speyer who turned around and created a disaster. Bloomberg stinks!

Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 10/28/09

Anonymous

And Thompson would be better, right? Wrong!

Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 10/28/09

Anonymous

number 2. you really are a number 2. if you know what I mean. also your an idiot.

Comment #4 Posted By: Anonymous 10/28/09

Anonymous

Blolomberg blows.

Comment #5 Posted By: Anonymous 10/28/09

Anonymous

#4 blows

Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 10/28/09

Leave a Comment

(optional)
(optional)

The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.