Apartment rents see annual price drop

September 09, 2009 01:30PM

Citi Habitats today released its rental market report for August, revealing year-over-year rent declines in all categories but little change from July.

The average rent for a Manhattan studio apartment in August was $1,756, down 9 percent from $1,919 in August of 2008, said the report (see below), which is based on transactions from Citi Habitats, the city's largest rental brokerage. The average rent for a one-bedroom was $2,442, down 8 percent from $2,668 in August of last year. Two-bedrooms fell 9 percent to $3,372 from $3,721 last August, and three-bedrooms dropped 8 percent to $4,583 from $4,995.

The report found that rents were virtually unchanged from the previous month. Average rents for studios and three-bedrooms both fell 1 percent from July, the report said, while one-bedrooms increased 1 percent, and rents for two-bedrooms were roughly the same as the previous month.

The report found that the priciest apartments were in Soho/Tribeca, where the average studio rented for $2,086, while three-bedrooms went for $7,400. The lowest prices were in Washington Heights, where rents ranged from $1,100 for a studio to $2,075 for a three-bedroom.

The vacancy rate in Manhattan was 1.62 percent, up slightly from 1.39 percent in August of last year, the report found.

Citi Habitats also said it did more rental transactions in August of 2009 than the same month of last year, but did not release specific figures.

By contrast, a Manhattan rental report released in July by Prudential Douglas Elliman -- tracking data from firms throughout the city -- found a 58.3 percent drop in rental transactions year-over-year in the second quarter, while the average rental price per square foot dropped 17.5 percent.

Got a tip? E-mail Candace Taylor at ct@therealdeal.com. CitiHabitats Rental Market Analysis - August 2009

Tags: citi habitats prudential douglas elliman rents

Comments

Anonymous

"The vacancy rate in Manhattan was 1.62 percent, up slightly from 1.39 percent". That slight increase equates to 16.5%, although the number is imprecise at best, and total BS at worst. Probably only based on listings from certain sources. Interestingly, I couldn't find any disclosure in the report indicating how the data are collected, methodology, etc. Are there any disinterested, independent market reports worth reading?

Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 09/09/09

Anonymous

This stuff is just PR as everyone knows the real vacancy rate in Manhattan is over 5% now.

Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 09/09/09

Anonymous

vacancy is definitely over 5%

Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 09/10/09

Leave a Comment

(optional)
(optional)

The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance or advertisements. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.