Architect injured at Goldman site files suit
September 18, 2008 05:30PM By Adam Pincus
Goldman Sachs tower
An architect paralyzed from the waist down after being crushed last December by falling building materials at the site of the rising Goldman Sachs headquarters accused the investment bank, Tishman Construction, a state entity and others of negligence, and is seeking an unspecified amount of money for damages, a lawsuit said.
The complaint was filed Tuesday in Manhattan State Supreme Court, while Wall Street was rocked by financial turmoil that left Goldman and Morgan Stanley as the only two large independent investment banks standing in the United States.
In his lawsuit, architect Robert Woo said he was permanently injured both physically and emotionally because of the accident on December 14, 2007, at the construction site of the 43-story office tower at 200 West Street at Vesey Street.
Goldman Sachs, now with main offices at 85 Broad Street, is building a 2.1-million-square-foot world headquarters at the site in Battery Park City near Ground Zero.
Woo, 40, was working as an architect for Adamson Associates Architects at the site when seven tons of metal studs supported by a nylon sling fell, crashing into the trailer in which he was working. He charged that the sling failed due to damage and fraying.
The suit names as defendants the building owner Goldman Sachs Headquarters; the project's general contractor Tishman Construction; the land owner Battery Park City Authority; three construction contractors; and a safety consultant.
Tishman received four Department of Buildings violations and the crane operator received one at the time of the accident.
Spokespeople for Goldman Sachs, Tishman and the authority said they did not comment on pending legal matters.
Woo suffered injuries, including trauma to his head and spinal cord, and is confined to a wheelchair for the rest of his life, his attorney Ben Rubinowitz said. In addition, Woo cannot work as an architect, the attorney said.
Woo's wife is also named as a plaintiff because of the effect of his injuries on their relationship, the court papers said. They live in Manhattan with their two children.
The suit was brought so Woo could receive compensation for injuries, medical care and pain and suffering, Rubinowitz said. He would not specify the amount of money Woo is hoping for.
The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.
Comments
Anonymous
This is a legit suit. Someones negligence made this man into a vegetable and he can never live normally again. Chances are his wife will have to cheat on him because they probably can't have sex anymore either. This isn't fair to him.
Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 09/18/08
Anonymous
Remarks from the writer of Comment #1 are ridiculous and smack of gross ignorance. I have been a paraplegic for 37 years, since I was 39. If, as the article says, Mr. Woo's spinal cord injury is from the waist down, the site of his lesion is lower than my own. Therefore, the physical quality of his life has every chance of being better than my own. Yet I was employed for 28 years in a wheelchair, raised three children with my wife, and yes, even had sex, though paralyzed. There is no indication that Mr. Woo has been turned into a vegetable, can "never live normally again", and will be deprived of sexual relations. Finally, the statement that his wife will have to cheat on him smacks of pure stupidity. I hope Mr. Comment #1 reads this rebuke and spends some time learning about the useful and happy lives that most victims of spinal cord injury are currently living.
Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 01/10/09