Co-op seller keeps dead buyer's down payment
January 06, 2009 04:15PM By Jovana Rizzo
1150 Park Avenue
In a recently settled lawsuit, the seller of an Upper East Side cooperative unit got to keep a down payment from a buyer who died before the closing.
Glen Altman was in contract to buy a co-op for $2.3 million at 1150 Park Avenue, between 91st and 92nd streets, and paid a $230,000 down payment. She was approved by the board, but before closing on the unit, she passed away.
Altman's estate wanted the down payment to be returned, but the Manhattan Supreme Court ruled that the seller could keep the money.
Ira Matetsky, an attorney at the law firm Gafner & Shore, who was not involved with the lawsuit but wrote about it in his firm's newsletter, said the seller won the suit because there was no provision in the contract stating that if the buyer died, the contract could be broken.
"In some situations, a contract contains a standard provision that if a purchaser should pass away before the closing, the contract is null and void," Matetsky said. "This case arose, and the contract didn't say one way or the other."
Altman, who passed away in 2005 at age 74, was survived by her daughter, Tracy Altman Warner. Warner, a Corcoran Group agent, and her attorney were not immediately available for comment. Altman and her husband, Edwin, who passed away in 2003, ran a wholesale diamond company called M.B. Altman Sons. The lawsuit was settled in October.
According to the lawsuit, the estate argued they were not obligated to go forward with the purchase because the contract called for occupancy by Altman only. However, there was no provision in the contract to cancel the deal.
JoAnn Schwimmer, an associate broker at DJK Residential, said she had never heard of a situation like that before. "It seems immoral," Schwimmer said of the seller keeping the down payment.
Roberta Axelrod, director of residential sales and rentals at Time Equities, said that in a few of her deals, lawyers have requested that a provision be put into a contract that would cancel the deal if the purchaser passed away.
"None of my purchasers have ever died," Axelrod said, "but the way it technically works is that unless you put it in the contract that you have the right to cancel it, the estate is bound to [the purchaser's] obligation."
If a purchaser buying a condo passed away, the
estate would have to buy the unit if there wasn't a provision in the
contract canceling it. In the case of a co-op, however, the estate has to be approved
by the board.
The co-op board president at 1150 Park Avenue, Herbert Appel, testified that the estate did not submit an application to go forward with the sale, and if the estate had wanted to purchase the unit, its application would have been considered by the board, although an estate has never bought a unit in the building.
Matetsky the attorney said, however, that typically a co-op board -- which has stringent requirements for approval -- would not allow an estate to buy a unit as it wouldn't know who from the estate would move in.
And in a case where an estate is required to go forward with the sale, Time Equities' Axelrod said, the seller can still decide to cancel the contract and return the money.
The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.
Comments
Anonymous
I completely agree with the seller here. A dead person should not have more rights than a live one. A contract is a contract. The seller didn't cause the buyer's death; it just happened. He is 100% entitled to keep that deposit and should to make up for lost time that his apartment was in contract.
Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 01/06/09
Anonymous
Number 1, How do you know that he didn't cause the buyer's death. Maybe the price scared him to death.
Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 01/06/09
Anonymous
Lets not get this mixed up with the intricacies of contract law. If the seller was a decent human being he would return the money back to the family.
Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 01/06/09
Anonymous
Amen #3 I believe this seller and Madoff would get along swimmingly.
Comment #4 Posted By: Anonymous 01/06/09
Anonymous
What's the difference between this seller and a swindler?
Comment #5 Posted By: Anonymous 01/06/09
Anonymous
It's surprising to learn that there is no "force majeure" clause in a standard real estate agreement. Force Majeure literally means "greater force". These clauses excuse a party from liability if some unforseen event beyond the control of that party prevents it from performing its obligations under the contract. Typically, force majeure clauses cover natural disasters or other "Acts of God", war, or the failure of third parties--such as suppliers and subcontractors--to perform their obligations to the contracting party. It is important to remember that force majeure clauses are intended to excuse a party only if the failure to perform could not be avoided by the exercise of due care by that party. If death isn't and Act of God, I don't know what is!
Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 01/07/09
Anonymous
I hope the buyer becomes a poltergeist and haunts the seller good.
Comment #7 Posted By: Anonymous 01/07/09
Anonymous
for god's sake give the poor guys estate back the money....what are you thinking about.....
Comment #8 Posted By: Anonymous 01/10/09
Anonymous
New York City has become a city of thieves.
Comment #9 Posted By: Anonymous 01/12/09
Anonymous
The Blumberg form of co-op sale contract used widely by the NYC real estate bar contains a provision that the contract "terminates upon the death of all persons comprising the purchaser." Unfortunate situation, but that's the deal the parties signed on for. Seller is not a thief, not amoral, just taking what is legally his.
Comment #10 Posted By: Anonymous 03/05/09