Developer battles Scarano in court
September 26, 2008 02:21PM By Adam Pincus
Architect Robert Scarano
Controversial architect Robert Scarano is locked in two court battles with a young development firm that is seeking at least $4 million in damages for two sold-out, luxury Manhattan projects that it claims were harmed by the architect's aggressive design practices.
West Village-based Blesso Properties filed a lawsuit September 17 in Manhattan State Supreme Court through a related company, which charges Scarano with fraud, breach of contract and negligence, and seeks damages in excess of $1 million for a project at 234 West 20th Street in Chelsea.
But, Scarano said in an interview that he believed the suit was just a tactical response to a lawsuit that he filed in June seeking $208,099 in payments he claimed the developer still owed him on a record-setting project at 138 West 124th Street in Harlem. At $1,007 per square foot, the two-bedroom penthouse condo was sold in 2007 at the highest price ever paid for an apartment above 110th Street, according to Corcoran Group Marketing.
In a counter suit, Blesso filed papers on September 4 seeking in excess of $3 million from Scarano for architectural malpractice, fraud and breach of contract.
"I've never worked for a baby like this guy," Scarano said of Matthew Blesso, the 35-year-old president of Blesso Properties. "They are too stupid to be building in New York City."
Blesso charged through court papers that Scarano filed building designs that he knew would not comply with the Department of Buildings' regulations.
"As a result of Scarano's misrepresentations and [the developer's] reliance thereon, [the developer] was required to expend significant sums to bring the project into compliance with the Buildings [Department] rules," the developer charged in the case of the Harlem condo, known as Loft124. It made similar claims concerning the Chelsea project.
In both cases, the developer claimed Scarano abused his self-certification privileges and filed plans although he "knew that his work would not and did not comply with the DOB standards," the developer alleges. After audits by the DOB, each plan was later revised, leading to delays and cost overruns, the Blesso filings said.
Scarano said in both instances the changes were minor and typical, and the delays were recovered in high sales prices.
"You can't go crying in the street with five loaves of bread under each arm," he said.
"Blesso Properties is an innovative real estate development company for which sensitivity to neighborhoods, environmental stewardship and profitability are integral to the firm's practice and definition of success," said Blesso's general counsel Michael Schneider. "Blesso Properties' reputation speaks for itself."
Blesso bought his first building in 1999 and opened his firm, which has developed 10 properties, in 2003, Schneider said. Blesso has worked with Scarano on three projects -- the two in litigation and one at 142 West 10th Street in Greenwich Village.
Scarano, a Brooklyn-based architect who estimated that he has worked on about 1,000 projects in the city, surrendered his right to self-certify in 2006 after coming under scrutiny from the DOB. Since then, his projects must be submitted to the department for review.
In June this year, the city's Department of Investigation filed administrative charges against Scarano, alleging he made false or misleading statements on DOB applications on a project in Brooklyn in 2000 and 2002. A department spokeswoman said today that the administrative charges remain under investigation.
Earlier, the architect was the focus of controversy and scrutiny from the DOB and the Department of Education after three construction workers died working on projects he designed in 2005 and 2006.
The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.
Comments
Anonymous
Let's see, on one hand we have an architect that is probably the most controversial in all of NY, has had his self-certification privileges revoked, is being investigated for making false statements to the DOB, has had multiple construction deaths associated with his projects and has neighborhood people picketing his projects. Then you have a developer with an otherwise clean record and a commitment to philanthropy and community investment. WHo should we believe?
Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 09/26/08
Anonymous
So comment #1- how is to work for Blesso? Is he also a good employer?
Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 09/26/08
Marshall
Good old Bobby is at it again! When is this guy finally going to lose his license?
Comment #3 Posted By: Marshall 09/26/08
Brooklynatect
Scarano's a hack!
Comment #4 Posted By: Brooklynatect 09/26/08
Anonymous
blessomaniac through out his only good guy
Comment #5 Posted By: Anonymous 09/26/08
Anonymous
I still laugh when remember scarano projects designing rooms with glazing past the height restriction by calling these spaces - dormers and putting bathrooms in there.
Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 09/29/08
Action Jackson
"the chickens have come home to roost" Perhaps it should be "pigeons?"
Comment #7 Posted By: Action Jackson 09/29/08
Anonymous
Jackson still hasn"t added value to anything but his mothers dirty basement keyboard he still types on. Get a life.
Comment #8 Posted By: Anonymous 09/29/08
Anonymous
Post #6. By the way thats called a penthouse by DOB definition DB.
Comment #9 Posted By: Anonymous 09/29/08
Anonymous
It seems to me that if you are not following the rules set forth for the protection of the workers on the projects, then you in turn should be reviewed and fined, if guilty. As for self-certification, that is not the least bit appropriate. An architect could draw plans that are not necessarily safe thereby endangering countless lives. I would never believe the qualifications of someone who is only certified because did so himself. It is like being the only person on an island and crowning yourself king, there is no one to question your practices or authority. I do not think Scarano has any concern other then himself and he should be watched with eagle eyes.
Comment #10 Posted By: Anonymous 10/01/08
Anonymous
Post #10 is the typical uninformed know nothing who has actually crowned him or herself king of knowing how to build in NYC. The eagle eyes should be focused on those lying thiefs we elect to protect us not professionals that make there living creating much needed HOUSING you idiot. Make no mistake that misguided individuals were given the same rights as everyone else that contributes their hard work to this city when the mayor introduced 311. That is the true injustice. By the way Architects do not endanger peoples lives idiots who build the jobs poorly do. Read about the hundreds of jobs Scarano has built housing families throughout the five boroughs and when you get to the level to shine his shoes then you can speak.
Comment #11 Posted By: Anonymous 10/02/08
Anonymous
Contractors are responsible for the safety and well being of their employees. you can not put the blame on Scarano for people dying on job sites. More over, i feel that scarano has made mistakes, but where was the DOB to begin with, they are the ones that are supposed to be making sure that these job sites are safe.
Comment #12 Posted By: Anonymous 05/29/09