Developers in a bind over prices
Banks won't budge on agreed-upon unit prices, placing builders in a bindJuly 01, 2008 04:35PM By Adam Pincus
Elan Padeh of the Developers Group said banks are aggravating slow sales.
Developers of flagging residential condo projects in the city may
be faced with a new real estate Catch-22: the prospect of having to
provide additional equity to lenders or take out more loans if they
want to cut prices to attract buyers.
The bind is a direct
result of the weak housing market, which is forcing developers to
reduce prices at the same time banks are reeling from the credit crunch
and have become unwilling to compromise on their loans.
The developers who do
discount prices can get caught in the financial squeeze because of a
little-discussed item from their mortgage known as a "release price."
What happens is that
early on, the lender and developer agree on a price for each condo unit
(generally about 90 percent of the sales price in the offering plan)
until most of the condos are sold.
As part of that
agreement, the developer cannot go below the release price without
consulting with the bank, because that revenue is reserved for the
lender, so it's the first entity to be paid off.
Gerald Kray, senior
director at Marcus and Millichap, a national real estate investment
advisor, said although prices remained strong in most of Manhattan,
they were falling in borderline neighborhoods, especially in Brooklyn,
Queens and the Bronx.
"The boroughs are a totally different
story; that market has cooled down a lot, and the prices have fallen off," Kray said.
If a developer does need to go lower than the release price, the bank may ask the
developer to bring on additional partners or to take out more loans to cover the bank's reduced revenue.
And now, those extra loans are more
expensive because credit has dried up.
Plus, "the lender is going to require additional equity," said Kevin Comer, senior managing director of Beck Street Capital.
Just a year ago, banks were lending at about a 75/25 loan-to-value ratio. Now, that is closer to a 60/40 ratio.
"The
well-heeled can renegotiate, [but] the weaker borrowers are going to
have problems. They are getting hit on two sides: They need equity, and
the cost of debt is going up," said Russell Schildkraut, principal with
the Ackman-Ziff Real Estate Group.
Comer expects the
weakness to expand. "We see, every day, condo projects in emerging
markets of New York City such as Williamsburg or Red Hook ... where the
developers are trying to get out of those deals in one form or another
without having to restructure loans," he said.
"We haven't seen it in
Manhattan itself, but I suspect over the next nine to 12 months, we
will see it as well, especially in emerging neighborhoods like the
Lower East Side and Harlem," he added.
Sofia Kim, vice
president of research at StreetEasy, said developers have resisted
slashing prices, which is costly and can reflect poorly on the project.
"Developers don't like to cut prices, so usually, that is the last resort," Kim said.
Abraham
Hidary, president of brokerage and development firm Hidrock Realty,
said he would need approval from lenders if he dropped prices by more
than 15 percent in any of his deals.
"But we have never had to do that. And I can't imagine selling below that price,
because we wouldn't be making any money," Hidary said.
Kray
said he expected to see smaller developers lose buildings, especially
in transitional neighborhoods such as the Rockaways or
Bedford-Stuyvesant.
"In my own opinion, it
is going to reach that point, especially with the third-tier and
second-tier developers, who don't have the experience. They are usually
the first to go," he said.
Developers may try to
get the bank or lenders to refinance the loan at a lower rate, but real
estate financial experts said that is unlikely.
"They can always go to
the original lender to ... maybe reduce the rate, which is more
uncommon," said Albert Marengo, chief financial officer at Gary Silver
Architects, where he also consults for other developers.
Borrowers are also seeking to extend the terms of the existing loans, in hopes that the market will improve later
this year.
"Banks
will be receptive. No bank wants to take over a property, and at the
same time, they make money," Marengo said. "I've definitely seen
six-month extensions."
Elan Padeh, president
and CEO of the Developers Group, said banks were aggravating slow sales
by pressuring developers to market units before enough construction had
been completed.
"Banks are their own
worst enemy by forcing developers to do a bad thing: open a project too
early," Padeh said. "It is happening to me right now. It shows the
banks are panicking."
Matthew Landau, a principal with Connecticut-based real estate investor Westport Capital Partners, said lenders are
simply trying to protect their profits.
"The
bank just has to decide what is in its best interest. That might be
foreclosure, or letting units sell cheaper, or forcing the borrower to
put in more equity," Landau said.
The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.
Comments
Anonymous
good
Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 07/03/08
Anonymous
I just don't get it.
Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 07/07/08
Anonymous
I just don't get it.
Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 07/07/08
RealDeal Junkie
I feel this is quite an ominous sign. This is a wake up call for all of the people a few months back who were talking about how the NYC real estate bubble was untouchable...
Comment #4 Posted By: RealDeal Junkie 07/10/08
Rockaway
This doesn't fair well for our community. With all the new development, at outrageous prices, we will be left with the blight of unsold coops and condos going into rentals. The housing bubble raised housing prices with no economic principles to explain the rise in costs. This left 600 thousand to 1 million dollar price tags that are out of reach to most New Yorkers, or Rockaway residents who believe in our community and love living here. Most of the development is city owned land. So, why is it that Rockaway residents’ can not afford these homes?
Comment #5 Posted By: Rockaway 07/11/08
Anonymous
Not sure I believe the story that developers can't lower prices in Manhattan because of bank requirements. I'm sure it's a hurdle. However, Charleston, 300 E 79th, The New Yorker, The Omni, Ludlow Lofts and many other new developments/conversions have done it and other boroughs and cities around the nation are doing it. I think it's mostly a dangerous excuse not to lower prices. But that will change once more buildings are getting finished and existing homes prices are dropping. 200 E 66th has not sold a single unit according to official databases.
Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 07/14/08
Anonymous
Don't know where you got my address but thankyou for the email. I'm a potential buyer and I find this news very interesting.
Comment #7 Posted By: Anonymous 07/24/08
Anonymous
Greed is good.... NOT!! It seems like the bubble is showing its face in the New York marketplace. The bouroughs are overpriced and time is no longer on the developer's side. The banks are dying and the developers are going to be the pall bearers.
Comment #8 Posted By: Anonymous 08/04/08
Anonymous
Is TDG still viable?
Comment #9 Posted By: Anonymous 11/23/08
Anonymous
I just do not understand why banks finally except the reality and share the loss with the developers so that the units are sold at a lower price, but preventing more severe losses in the future
Comment #10 Posted By: Anonymous 12/18/08