Fitch downgrades CMBS deals backed by Stuy Town
October 30, 2009 07:15PM By David Jones
Stuyvesant Town
Fitch Ratings today downgraded three CMBS deals backed by Stuyvesant Town and Peter Cooper Village following the Court of Appeals ruling earlier this month that the owners illegally converted rent-stabilized apartments to market-rate units and must refund more than $200 million to current and former tenants.
In a landmark 4-2 decision, the court upheld a lower court ruling that rent-stabilized tenants could not be forced to pay market rates in buildings receiving so-called J-51 tax incentives from the city.
Tishman and its investment partner, BlackRock Realty, were dependent on that additional income to finance their massive $5.4 billion acquisition of Stuy Town and Peter Cooper Village in 2006. The property had already been in serious financial trouble due to the commercial credit crisis and national recession, and this ruling could deliver a major blow to the sponsors.
The apartment complex, Stuy Town and Peter Cooper Village, comprises a total of 11,227 units. Fitch estimates that as of July 2009, about 60 percent of the units were rent-stabilized, with the rest at market rate. The building had a vacancy rate of about 4 percent.
Fitch said that cash flow from the property is significantly lower than what is needed to cover the debt, adding that the landlord is using debt service reserves to cover its operating shortfall. Fitch said the balance of that reserve was $24.4 million as of this month, but warned that the money will last only through December.
Fitch warned that once the reserves run out, the lender will likely call in a default and the loan will be transferred to a special servicer.
Based on current cash flow, Fitch estimates a 40 percent loss on the $3 billion note, which is the main mortgage loan. Fitch added that despite the prospect of a near-term default, there will likely be a long workout period and the full extent of the loss may not be realized until the loan matures in 2016.
The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.
Comments
Fred
Did the Tenants really win?
Comment #1 Posted By: Fred 10/31/09
Anonymous
Is the 4-2 decision final? Are a higher appeal on the way?
Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 10/31/09
Anonymous
The problem had already been in trouble not because of the commercial credit crisis and the recession, but because of the simple fact that even with the illegal rent increases and the initially massive debt reserves, they didn't have enough income to keep servicing the debt for more than a couple more months.
Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 10/31/09
Anonymous
There is no way that Tishman can forgo the special servicer.
Comment #4 Posted By: Anonymous 11/01/09
Anonymous
TIshman passed al ot of the losses on to other investors. Something that has been done in real estate in NYC for centuries. The tenants won this lawsuit for they were also using public funding. Case is over, look for more lawyers to join this case.
Comment #5 Posted By: Anonymous 11/01/09
Anonymous
Put it up on " BidontheCity.com" Start it out with a 1 mil reserve. Im sure it will sell quickly to the Euros.
Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 11/01/09
Anonymous
There is no avenue for another appeal. It is a State matter and the Court of Appeals is the State's highest court. Game over.
Comment #7 Posted By: Anonymous 11/01/09
Anonymous
Bloomberg to the rescue. He has enough excess cash to buy it all!
Comment #8 Posted By: Anonymous 11/01/09
Anonymous
Tishman bought the porperty at $481K per door, if the bank is taking a discount of 40% on the $3b note then someone can get control of this property at $160K a door, that is actually a great deal, regardless of rent controlled units...
Comment #9 Posted By: Anonymous 11/03/09