HL23 developer sues over stop work order, 'shake down'

June 17, 2008 04:38PM
HL23

 
The developer of a high profile residential project on the High Line has sued the Department of Buildings over a seven-week-old stop work order. The lawsuit claims that the stop-work order is in place because the builder refuses to pay a "shake down" fee to a neighboring developer.

Alf Naman, the developer of HL23, called 23 Highline in court documents, filed the lawsuit in Manhattan State Supreme Court on June 9 against the city, next-door developers Highline Park and Sleepy Hudson, the developers of 519 West 23rd Street, a Lindy Roy-designed condo building finished in the fall of 2007, and its condo association.

The suit sought to lift an April 30 Buildings Department work stoppage for Naman's project at 515 West 23rd Street for performing shoring work under next-door 519 West 23rd Street without the neighbor's permission. That work was completed in November, 2007.

A partial stop work order remains, which allows only foundation work. To completely lift the stop work order, the city wants Naman to get permission from the neighbors to proceed, the suit says.

But Naman said a representative from developer Highline Park sought $850,000 to get its permission during a meeting in April, the lawsuit claims.

Paul Bonnar, president of Leeds United Construction, the general contractor at the neighboring site, was at the meeting and disputed that account.

"The truth is there was no request made or demand made for money," he said.

The stoppage has also endangered construction financing for HL23 project, the lawsuit claims.
 
Naman did not respond to requests for comment.

A DOB spokeswoman said the stop work order would remain in effect until the judge orders it to be lifted or the developer obtains consent.

Naman's 14-story, 11-unit luxury condominium project was designed by architect Neil Denari. An exhibit of the building at the Museum of the City of New York opened yesterday.

The building was designed in close collaboration with the city, which permitted variances that have not been given to most developments in the area. For example, it is within five feet of the High Line park, closer than the standard 15-foot setback. Also, the top two top floors are cantilevered over the tracks, a public space.

However, the tighter scrutiny of the DOB following recent crane and building collapses may make lifting the stop work order more difficult for the developers, real estate experts said.

The lawsuit charged that during a May 8 meeting, Max Lee, the DOB's Manhattan Deputy Borough Commissioner, would not address evidence that the foundation shoring work was performed according to drawings.

"He simply advised that 'it had come from above' that DOB would not lift the SWO (stop work order)" unless the developers could prove they had consent from the neighboring building to complete the work, the filing said.

Trying to force the city to lift a work stoppage is "not an unusual proceeding," said Stephen Nahley, a partner in the real estate practice of law firm Moses and Singer.
 
The next court date was set for June 18.


Comments

T.Truong

If the construction clearly shows no sign of neglect or indications of pedestrian endangerment, there should not have been a SWO in the first place. It sounds like this SWO was called in by the neighboring building, in which case, an inspector came and made a bad call. DOB is the police power for construction. Who do we go to when they are the ones that are wrong? It was a good move taking them to court.

Comment #1 Posted By: T.Truong 06/17/08

Anonymous

I find it incredible, that the city and the DOB have so little respect and understanding for building costs where they would stop a massive project like this for 7 weeks without any consideration for, not only, the development, but also the neighborhood, by delaying this construction site from being finished.

Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 06/17/08

Kaper

What a great read! No mater how cool this pad is, I'd rather have more park than an apartment block over my head, when strolling the High Line. Btw, prevous comments sound like the troubled owner and his construction peeps.

Comment #3 Posted By: Kaper 06/17/08

Neighbors

The second post asks why the DOB would stop this project.... the answer is safety! With all the cranes falling and other accidents, the city is hopefully being more careful- or at least taking more time. I'd rather wait 7 weeks than have a crane fall on me (or my family!) The HL23 project wanted to put a monster crane right in the middle of busy 23rd st., blocking off 3 lanes of traffic on the already clogged cross street-- when they can put the crane on the 24th st. side of the property, where it cant fall on a pedestrian or car...for this we should be happy to wait 7 weeks!

Comment #4 Posted By: Neighbors 06/18/08

Leave a Comment

(optional)
(optional)

The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.