Buyers get an out at Linden78
May 07, 2009 02:00PM By Candace Taylor

Due to construction delays, the developers of Upper West Side condominium Linden78 have given all of the project's buyers the option to back out of their contracts, a phenomenon that may become more common throughout the city as the credit crisis slows building progress.
The sponsors of Linden78, a 33-unit condominium at 230 West 78th Street, offered rescission rights to all of the project's buyers in mid-April, according to a statement provided exclusively to The Real Deal from the developer, Urban Residential.
"The building was originally slated for completion in 2008, but experienced delays during construction," Urban Residential said in the statement, released through the project's exclusive sales agent, Corcoran Sunshine Marketing Group. "As a result of the delays, a provision of the condominium offering plan required the developer to offer rescission rights to purchasers."
Christopher Westley, vice president of sales and marketing for Urban Residential, said he couldn't comment on the rescission letters at Linden78, or how many residents had chosen to get out of their contracts. He also would not say how many units have been sold but noted that there are two units currently available for sale.
"The project's still going forward," he said.
By law, if there is a material amendment to the offering plan that adversely affects the purchasers, the sponsors must grant a right of rescission -- meaning they may opt to be released from their contract and get their deposits back -- within 15 days, said Meg Goble, a partner at law firm Hanley & Goble, who is not involved with Linden78.
The law specifically stipulates construction delays as grounds for the right of rescission, she said. If the sponsor does not close at least one unit in the building within a year of the date it had originally projected for the commencement of the condo -- known as the "outside" date -- all of the buyers must be offered the right of rescission, Goble explained.
Urban Residential, which has offices in New York City, Philadelphia and Boston, did not comment on the outside date for Linden78.
The idea behind the requirement, she said, is to protect consumers from being stuck in a long-delayed project for years. "Why should the investing public have to stick [with] a deal because the developer wasn't able to pull it off?" she said.
Missing the outside date doesn't always mean the project is in trouble, she said, since construction delays are common. And when the real estate market was booming, buyers of new condos often didn't mind delays because they knew the apartment was increasing in value. But with homes losing value in today's market downturn, buyers are looking for every opportunity to get out of their contracts.
"Everybody's looking for a right of rescission," she said. "There are a lot of people who either feel that they're overpaying because the market has dropped in value, or they've lost their job. They're scoping out the plan to see if there's some hook I can hang my hat on here."
With projects all over town stalled due to the lack of credit and the difficulty of getting financing, many more buyers may soon have the opportunity. Already, buyers at Long Island City's Crescent Club were offered the right of rescission this winter that the developer, NCF Equities, missed the promised delivery date, according to Prudential Douglas Elliman Senior Vice President Avi Voda, who is handling sales at the 130-unit building.
Voda said the building is still awaiting its temporary certificate of occupancy. He would not disclose how many buyers decided to exercise their right of rescission.
Urban Residential also cited the recent crane collapses, including one in March 2008 at 303 East 51st Street, which killed seven people, as the reason for delays at Linden78.
"Given the unrelated collapses of two construction cranes at other construction sites in New York and the fire at the Deutsche Bank Building during 2008, heightened safety regulations in the construction industry contributed to the complications resulting in the delays," the statement said.
There is currently a partial stop-work order on the property due to a problem with a chimney at the site, according to a Department of Buildings spokesperson. There have been several other stop-work orders at the site in the past which have now been resolved, according to the DOB Web site.
But it's possible that the developer may be having financial difficulties. According to city data, Urban Residential has at least $35 million in loans on the property from Horsham, Penn.'s Capmark Finance, and at least one vendor at the site, Les Construction Beauce Atlas, has filed mechanics' liens at the project.
Urban Residential has another project on hold, the W Philadelphia Hotel & Residences in Pennsylvania, according to published reports.
The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.
Comments
Anonymous
Urban Residential is toast. Who wouldn't get their money back? How they going to sell all those units in this market? Who will be the white knight developer?
Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 05/07/09
Anonymous
Hello? Buyers, read your contracts; if the builder takes in excess of 2 years, they CAN'T force you to close. They are simply in compliance now, letting you know, because it's been hidden by them.
Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 05/07/09
Anonymous
They are really reaching for it when they blame crane collapses at OTHER buildings for their delay o fover a full year! That takes cajones! Eve the building whose crane actually collapsed on 91st Street was only delayed for 4 months.
Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 05/07/09
Anonymous
I live in area. What a disaster this thing is to neighborhood. Who would want to live here? You have to be from Mars to buy into this crappy building. Will take years to complete... probably by another developer after this monster goes to Bankruptcy court.
Comment #4 Posted By: Anonymous 05/16/09
Anonymous
I live across the street and this thing has been a nightmare since the beginning. Lazy construction and way over schedule. I just want them to get the hell out of here so I don't have to listen to an hour of dumping garbage every morning at 7am.
Comment #5 Posted By: Anonymous 05/27/09
Anonymous
The owners should be jailed for this mess. Get your money back and run!!!
Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 07/17/09