New rental report shows 60% drop in volume
July 09, 2009 12:01AM By Candace Taylor
Elliman CEO Dottie Herman
Residential brokerage Prudential Douglas Elliman today released its first-ever quarterly rental Manhattan market report, revealing an eye-popping 58.3 percent drop in rental transactions from last year as waves of unemployment battered the city.
The report, which tracked data about the rental market that has never before been published, determined that 2,346 apartments were rented in the second quarter of 2009, down from 5,624 during the same quarter of 2008. That drop coincided with a 17.5 percent decrease in the average rental price per square foot to $44.16, from $53.50 in the prior-year quarter. Meanwhile, the number of rental listings swelled by nearly a third to 7,290 from 5,658 in second-quarter 2008.
Though the rental market has been widely believed to be healthier than the sales market, the results largely mirrored the slowdown shown in recent sales reports, said Jonathan Miller, the president of real estate appraisal firm Miller Samuel, who prepared the report.
"The results this quarter were very similar to the purchase market," said Miller, who also prepares Elliman's widely watched sales reports. "We saw activity off by more than half, inventory is rising and prices are falling."
There was one bright spot amid the gloom. The report found a surprising surge in rentals during the month of June. Nearly 50 percent of rental transactions for the quarter took place in June, Miller said. In previous years, the percentage of sales was usually evenly divided between April, May and June.
Prices may be lower and incentives more plentiful, but summer is still the busiest time of year for rentals, and that hasn't changed, brokers told The Real Deal in a July magazine story.
The June surge probably doesn't spell a turnaround, but the uptick could be an encouraging sign if it's followed by several similar months of activity, Miller said.
"It's no secret that the economy has a ways to go and unemployment is still rising," he said. "What happened in June is not reflective of some new market. But it's very possible we could see a higher level of activity in the later part of 2009."
The average monthly rent of a Manhattan apartment was $3,839 in the second quarter, the report found, roughly the same rent as in the prior-year quarter, while the median rental price was $3,100, down 3.1 percent from $3,200 at the same time last year.
Miller said average and median prices have stayed largely the same in part because sales of large homes have suffered while many first-time homebuyers, anxious to take advantage of lower sales prices, have purchased studios and one-bedrooms. As a result, the average rental apartment is now larger than in the past.
Unlike residential sales, rental transactions are not publicly recorded. To produce the report, Miller gathered market information from both Elliman and his firm's databases. Miller said he has been gathering rental data for years in preparation for the report.
"This is something I've had on the back burner for a long time," he said. "As we're going through this economic period, the rental market should be covered. I just thought it was time."
Brokerages Citi Habitats and the Real Estate Group of New York, which recently merged with the Developers Group, also produce rental reports, but many of the categories that Miller measured — including average and median Manhattan rental prices, rental price per square foot, the number of rental transactions, days on market and listing inventory — have never before been reported to the public.
"This is a very comprehensive report," said Dottie Herman, the president and CEO of Elliman. "There are no other reports that even come close."
Known primarily as a sales firm, Elliman has turned more of its attention to rentals lately, with a new rentals division and Web site. The rental market report was the next logical step, Herman said.
"You have to have information today because people can get it all over," she said. "We're a real estate firm so we should be the ones to provide it."
Citi Habitats' quarterly report, which was also released today, similarly found that rental prices in each size category declined from the prior-year quarter, though the company does not publish price per square foot, transaction volume or overall average Manhattan rents. Citi Habitats found that the average rent for studios fell 8.3 percent from the prior-year quarter to $1,765, one-bedrooms fell 8 percent to $2,428, two-bedrooms dipped 11.3 percent to $3,448 and three-bedrooms saw a decrease of 11.4 percent to $4,637.
Elliman's report recorded similar drops, but found the average rent to be generally higher. According to Elliman, average studio rental prices fell 5.9 percent to $2,304, one-bedrooms were down 13.2 percent to $2,874, two-bedrooms slipped 4.4 percent to $5,018 and three-bedrooms dropped 7.5 percent to $8,849.
Discrepancies in the data likely arise from the fact that Citi Habitats' report only measures data from transactions at the firm, explained Gary Malin, the president of Citi Habitats. He said he doesn't view Elliman's report as competition because the reports use different methodologies.
"Obviously, the more information that's out there, the better," Malin said of Elliman's contribution to rental market reporting. "I'm always going to feel like our report is the most comprehensive because it's a much larger sample."
Miller said it's difficult to tell whose sample size is larger because the data is not public, though he said he is comfortable with his data, which measures "thousands of transactions, collected in a consistent way."
The Real Estate Group of New York, called TDG/TREGNY since the merger, does not produce quarterly reports.
The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance or advertisements. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.
Comments
Toronto Apartments
According to me this was expected, mainly due to the global recession. Lets hope that for the next year it should improve.
Comment #1 Posted By: Toronto Apartments 07/09/09
Anonymous
Keep hoping.
Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 07/09/09
Anonymous
#2 needs to keep hoping because they dont want it to improve. oh well...buh bye.
Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 07/09/09
Anonymous
Improve is a relative term. Improve meaning higher prices is good only for a select few. Improve meaning rational prices and a functioning and healthy market probably means further softening.
Comment #4 Posted By: Anonymous 07/09/09
Anonymous
It will keep dropping until the jobs situation turns around.
Comment #5 Posted By: Anonymous 07/09/09
Anonymous
Elliman's rental report is based on who's listings? They are not in the rental business and are putting this out to PR their new rental department which will not last. Sales's brokers know nothing about rentals as their agents look down upon it and it's only a reflection of how they are losing so much money in sales.
Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 07/09/09
Anonymous
and yet Bond New York keeps expanding.
Comment #7 Posted By: Anonymous 07/09/09
Anonymous
Put John Miller up there...the guy wrote the damn thing!
Comment #8 Posted By: Anonymous 07/09/09
Anonymous
#6, continue to stay in denial. The market is taking a beating, the economy is taking a beating, and things will continue to decline. Deal with it
Comment #9 Posted By: Anonymous 07/09/09
Anonymous
I read the report and it is complete nonsense! JM and Elliman should stick with reporting on sales as their lack of experience in rentals is clearly evident in this report.
Comment #10 Posted By: Anonymous 07/09/09
Anonymous
Prices are down but volume is up. This report is seriously flawed.
Comment #11 Posted By: Anonymous 07/10/09
Anonymous
so - i can't say i understand this report at all, frankly. First, inventory is so highly unreliable on the rental side as landlords will never/ have never completely disclosed all of their inventory (do they count apartments under renovation, those in which the tenants move out in a week, etc.) and because landlords don't calculate inventory the same way, let alone share it all, inventory is an amorphous stat to rely on. Secondly, fewer than half of rental buildings actually have calculated or shared square feet per apartment, making $/sq ft irrelevant. Quarterly comps are just silly - of COURSE Q2 will be busier than Q1, as it is every year. Y-o-Y comps are better, but not perfect. Take the Lower East Side : 2007 to 2008 comps would show a 25%+ increase in rents. Why? Because the Ludlow, a top-of-the-line rental building completely skewed the comps. You must look at actual inventory (changing and evolving annually), not assuming that the same 1-bed last year was x% different than that exact 1-bed this year. Lastly, does this report calculate coop and condo rentals?? they're a different beast but still compete with traditional rental buildings.
Comment #12 Posted By: Anonymous 07/11/09