Investors urge Ratner to ditch Brooklyn for Newark arena

April 25, 2008 07:13PM
The Prudential Center


Developer Bruce Ratner has been approached by several New Jersey investors and public officials on a plan to relocate the Nets to the Prudential Center in downtown Newark, according to sources familiar with the talks.

The investors would like Ratner to have the Nets partner with the New Jersey Devils and move into the Prudential Center in Newark, where the hockey team has just finished its first full season.

"They're being wooed politically as well as by the private sector," said Ken Baris, a West Orange, New Jersey-based realtor, who is familiar with some of the investors who have approached Ratner. "There's a lot of people that kind of want to keep it quiet, but [at the same time] are looking forward to a lot more leaks."

A move to Newark would effectively end Ratner's efforts to move the Nets to a proposed $950 million Barclays Center in downtown Brooklyn, which was to serve as the centerpiece of his controversial $4 billion Atlantic Yards complex and would be the most expensive basketball arena in the country. Nets officials denied there have been any plans to move to Newark and have insisted they are moving forward with the Brooklyn arena.

"The Nets are moving to Brooklyn, period," said Barry Baum, a spokesman for Forest City Ratner who handles the Nets.

Still, sources say the discussions have life.

Since the October opening of the Prudential Center, Newark officials have urged New Jersey Governor, Jon Corzine, to shut down the Izod Center in East Rutherford, where the Nets have played since 1981.

After failing to make the playoffs and trading its star player, Jason Kidd, the Nets are expected to lose more than $40 million for the 2007-2008 season. They currently plan to stay at the Izod Center for at least another two seasons.

"If they don't get that arena built in Brooklyn in the next couple of years, I'm doubtful that Ratner would want to keep paying for losses for the Nets," said Michael Cramer, professor of sports management at New York University. "It would have been good to get the Nets and Devils in the same arena."

Baum said, however, that the Nets are set to announce new corporate partners in May for luxury suites at the proposed Barclays arena, and are working to sell season tickets and corporate sponsors at the Izod Center for the remaining two years at that site.

New Jersey Devils owner Jeff Van der Beek declined to comment on the Nets. But, he said, the arena is doing much better than "our wildest expectations." He said the Devils were averaging about 16,000 fans a game and that the arena would average about 175 event nights in its first year. He said he hoped that the number of events would climb to 225 per year in the future.

Essex County Executive Joseph DiVincenzo wants the Nets to join the Devils in Newark, and has publicly questioned claims by the New Jersey Sports and Exposition Authority that the arena can turn a profit with no hockey team and limited public transportation.

"We would welcome the Nets with open arms," DiVincenzo told The Real Deal. "If anything could be negotiated I think it would be great." A provision in the Nets lease with the NJSEA calls for a $12 million penalty if the Nets move to another arena outside of Brooklyn or Queens, however the Star Ledger reported earlier this week that officials might be willing to waive the penalty.

Ratner told the New York Times in March that he would not be able to finance the full 16 building Atlantic Yards project for several years due to a weak financing environment and the inability to find an anchor tenant for the Miss Brooklyn office tower. However, he said, that he would move ahead with the arena by the end of 2008.

Atlantic Yards opponents have petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to hear their case and officials from Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn said they expect the court make a decision on whether to hear it by June.

Comments

Anonymous

As one who would like Ratner to stay out of Brooklyn, I say GREAT@

Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 04/26/08

Tal Barzilai

As a New Jersey Nets season ticket holder, I find the move to Newark much better than Brooklyn. Nobody will loose their homes, and it won't involve any emminent domain. It will be win-win for both those comming by car or by mass transit since the Prudential Center will have easy access from either the I-280 and New Jersery 21, which are both from the New Jersey Turnpike (I-95), as well as the others who will use trains to get to Newark-Penn Station from either New Jersey Transit or PATH along with the Newark City Subway for residnets. As a matter of fact, this wouldn't take years to build because the arena is already there. I will not argue that the Meadowlands was designed for drivers, though the Port Authourity is working to build a New Jersey Transit line that will stop there around 2015 after leaving from New York-Penn Station, which will be a help for Jets and Giants living in New York City. Either way, the move to Newark is something that can be done as early as next season for the Nets if they get terminate the lease that ends in about five years.

Comment #2 Posted By: Tal Barzilai 04/28/08

Anonymous

it's the right move basically a no brainer come on ratner wake up and smell the coffe every0ne will benefit from a newark arena who will that be bruce ratner nj nets nj devils nj sports authority the city of newark the state of new jersey and the fans

Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 04/28/08

NYSportsfan

Everyone knows Ratner doesn't really care about BK. He wants his 'Manhattan East', the arena is just the topping on the pizza. Jerseyans didn't provide a hardcore fan-base, but who would want to visit the swampto watch nba? Football, sure, but I'd go anywhere to watch football (a lot more people). NJ should have had a team/arena in Jersey City or Newark years ago, and please don't give me that crime rates crap, I go to the BX to see the Yanks all the time...

Comment #4 Posted By: NYSportsfan 04/29/08

Leave a Comment

(optional)
(optional)

The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted,
irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal
does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site.