Scaffolding kills life of UES "living wall"

November 19, 2009 11:30AM

At the time, it seemed like a good idea. When Pure Yoga opened one and a half years ago at 203 East 86th Street, this purveyor of inner peace opted to adorn the upper portion of its two story façade with a "living wall" of plants, in varied shapes and colors, that covered every inch of its expansive surface. It was ably designed by Green Living Technologies. Quite aside from such karmic enhancements as the living wall conferred, it also proved to be a shrewd marketing maneuver. Though not the only such wall in the city, it was and remains sufficiently rare that it was able to garner a good deal of invaluable publicity.

Pure Yoga, however, did not reckon with one of the sad facts of life in the big city -- that only the rarest of buildings in Manhattan manages to escape the ubiquitous outrage of scaffolding bridges. And so the living wall had not been up six months when the building it inhabits, the Colorado, decided to do a bit of refacing. The scaffolding went up about a year ago and, as always, it sliced sheer across the second story of the building, entombing the living wall in constant darkness, notwithstanding its precious southern exposure.

For some time, the owners of Pure Yoga held tight, continuing to water the plants through a complicated and costly tangle of pipes built into the wall. But eventually it became clear that they were fighting a losing battle, and there appears to be no end in sight for the removal of the scaffolding. Now, in the resulting wasteland, a few gray and brown tufts of grass continue to cling to the wall, amid the scattered traces of caked earth. Most of the plants, however, have vanished, exposing the metal armature beneath. The living wall is now a dead wall.

As it happens, I have been apartment hunting lately, on the Upper East and West sides. Like most prospective buyers, I knew which features I definitely wanted and, as important, which I would not be able to live with. In the latter category was the refusal to inhabit a second story apartment. In other cities around the nation and the world, there would be no problem. But the reality of Manhattan is that the second floor is the new ground floor, and the ground floor is the new basement, thanks to the ubiquity of scaffolding bridges. I wonder if it has yet filtered into the thinking of prospective buyers and renters of second-floor apartments that for a good portion of their tenancy, much, if not all, of their light will be blocked, together with any view out their window. In compensation, they will have the company, at least during the daylight hours, of hard hats plying their trade barely two feet away, just outside the window.


From left: Pure Yoga's "living wall" at 203 East 86th Street, as it was intended, and wall today, after scaffolding was installed (right photo source: A Fine Blog)

All of this is the absurd consequence of two bad and thoroughly thoughtless laws, Local Law 10, passed in 1980, and Local Law 11, passed in 1998, that mandated these ugly and largely useless sheds. You won't find them in anything like the same abundance in Paris, Berlin, London or Hong Kong, and yet it is not evident that the imperiled citizens of those metropolises are dying left and right. Meanwhile, you can no longer look in any direction on the Upper East or West sides, in Midtown or the Financial District, without seeing these scaffolding bridges. Nor is it possible any longer to walk with pleasure down Park Avenue -- unless you enjoy the constant interruption of these sheds that are so efficiently destroying the urban fabric of New York City.

James Gardner, formerly the architecture critic of the New York Sun, writes on the visual arts for several publications.

Tags: 203 east 86th street james gardner pure yoga scaffolding


Comments

Anonymous

I hear you James... These a ridiculous. Why Americans always need to supersize everything they do...

Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 11/19/09

Nicole S. Barr

Great article, James....Best Nicole

Comment #2 Posted By: Nicole S. Barr 11/19/09

Anonymous

Not only is it an eyesore, but can you imagine having a retail business under one of these contraptions. I feel for the retailer in a long lease who when negotiated the terms did not take in account their visiblity would be obstructed for possibly years at a time. No doubt ther is a loss of revenue.

Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 11/19/09

Anonymous

Have you walked down 5th Ave lately. Its "Scaffold City" They have been up for what seems to be eternity and half of the time you can't see anyone working on the building. Is there a penalty for not taking it down in a timely manner. Is there a kickback scandle going on here. Someone should look into this.

Comment #4 Posted By: Anonymous 11/19/09

Anonymous

James, Thank you for bringing light to a sore subject. No fault of Green Living, to their credit they too are a victim of such hideous laws and what a loss of a great facade.

Comment #5 Posted By: Anonymous 11/19/09

Anonymous

useless sheds??? These sheds are installed to provide public safety. You do not see sheds all over in Europe because ppl there maintain their buildings when needed and do no wait until portions of their facade are falling off onto the sidewalk below.

Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 11/19/09

Anonymous

Entirely right. But good luck trying to get DOB to modify the regulations. They are too afraid of litigation. That is what will bring this country down: fear as the #1 motive in decision making.

Comment #7 Posted By: Anonymous 11/19/09

Anonymous

Someone needs to follow the money on these highly profitable installations. They are all too automatically installed at the least problem and almost always without competitive bidding. Life safety is important. The problem should be assessed and fixed or secured immediately - maybe with just a sidewalk closure.

Comment #8 Posted By: Anonymous 11/19/09

Anonymous

In my 6 years of living in the city (living in lower Manhattan), I have witnessed scaffolding collapse TWICE. When that stuff goes down, there is no hope for survival, it crushes card on the street, and any human passing underneath. My husband and I ran out to the ATM early one morning before a 5am flight. We crossed the street becuase of a shady person heading our way, and seconds later, the scaffolding we would have been under had collapsed, crushing a pickup truck and several other cars. I hate the stuff!

Comment #9 Posted By: Anonymous 11/19/09

Anonymous

Local Law 11 has provided a huge boon to the scaffolding business, and a huge blight on the esthetics of street life in the city. Why these bridges have to remain up for more than a year in many locations is a mystery to me. Even after they're finally removed, they've often either killed or mangled the street trees. This scaffolding thing is out of control.

Comment #10 Posted By: Anonymous 11/19/09

Leave a Comment

(optional)
(optional)

The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance or advertisements. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.