LIC club sues city to keep its topless rights

June 17, 2009 07:10PM


A large strip club at the base of the Queensboro Bridge in Queens Plaza is fighting the city's efforts to force it out of its valuable location in Long Island City, a decade after zoning laws pushed it out of another location two miles away, according to a lawsuit filed Monday.

The gentleman's club, Scandals, at 24-03 Queens Plaza North, is suing the city and the Department of Buildings to stop the government from trying to change the club's certificate of occupancy, which would make it illegal for the club to remain as is in the approximately 6,000-square-foot location.

Scandals maintains that "its First Amendment and other rights have been threatened by the contradictory and erroneous positions of the Department of Buildings," the lawsuit says.

The city applied, through its administrative review agency, the Board of Standards and Appeals, to remove the authorization for an adult club, Scandals' complaint, filed in New York State Supreme Court, says.

The suit claims that the city also recommended Scandals waive any claim that it can run a 100 percent adult operation at the location and suggested it convert it to a so-called 60/40 club, which means that less than 40 percent would be available for adult business.

The club is owned and operated by TC Queens Entertainment, which did not respond to a request for comment.

Yesterday, a State Supreme Court judge said the BSA would have to rule on the city's application before the lawsuit could continue.

"We are pleased that [State Supreme Court Justice Louis York] recognized that Scandals must argue its case before the appropriate administrative body before it can go to court," Robin Binder, deputy chief of the city's Law Department, said in a statement to The Real Deal.

Scandals is next to the luxury condominium development View59, at 24-15 Queens Plaza North, in a rapidly gentrifying neighborhood where 400,000 square feet of new housing has been built, said John Maltz, president of Long Island City-based commercial brokerage Greiner-Maltz Real Estate, who is not involved with the lawsuit.

alternate text

"The city has a policy of forcing undesirable uses out of gentrifying neighborhoods," Maltz said.

But relics of the neighborhood's racy past remain.

On the other side of Queens Plaza is the strip club Cityscapes, at 27-00 Queens Plaza South. Long-timers said many strip clubs migrated to Queens after the administration of Mayor Rudolph Giuliani pressured strip clubs to leave the Times Square area.

In 1995, the city passed a law generally prohibiting adult uses in residential districts, or within 500 feet of a school, house of worship and other sensitive locations.

In July 2001 the city rezoned Queens Plaza to include a residential component, but in May 2002 the DOB granted a certificate of occupancy to the club to open up. The city said it has applied to change that certificate of occupancy, according to a spokesperson for the Department of Law, the city's attorney.

Joseph Conley, the chairman of Community Board 2, said the board, which covers the area just south of the strip club, wants the strip club to go.

"We would like to have them all out," he said.  

Insiders said a strip club in Queens Plaza would likely pay about 25 percent more in rent than a traditional retail or restaurant use in the same space, and was likely occupying the space despite the club's December 2008 lease expiration through a commonplace feature such as a five-year lease extension.

It was in 1998 that TC Queens Entertainment was forced to move by city zoning laws. Before moving to Queens Plaza that year, TC Queens Entertainment operated a nightclub at 32-37 Greenpoint Avenue about two miles south, but moved when it ran afoul of the new 1995 zoning regulations because it was too close to a cemetery, the filing says.

In December 1998, the strip club owners signed a 10-year lease with Kenbridge Realty, the owner of the one-story building on Queens Plaza North. TC Queens then undertook a gut rehabilitation of the space, which they completed in May 2002. Kenbridge did not respond to requests for comment.


Comments

Anonymous

I love Those Cleveland Steamers. Yeah Boy!

Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 06/17/09

Anonymous

I Love This Place...Its like my second home....Its should stay...Im starting a petition today!

Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 06/18/09

Anonymous

CB2 needs to be replaced.

Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 06/18/09

Anonymous

is this the real deal or did I mistakenly wind up at a porn site?

Comment #4 Posted By: Anonymous 06/18/09

Anonymous

....same old story: city does a landgrab on behalf of their real estate developer contributors, who will create more vacant lofts that no one in LIC can afford. Welcome to Williamsburg II : where locals will again be replaced by the next iteration of yuppies (or whatever their moniker is these days) moving into distressed real esate in prime locations.

Comment #5 Posted By: Anonymous 06/19/09

Anonymous

Here Here #5

Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 06/19/09

Anonymous

TC Ent. cleaned up that whole area. It was a serious slum and other businesses were able to thrive because they brought new life into the area. Before, an abandoned store front consumed by graffiti. Pimps and prostitutes ran the street, drugs under the bridge. They built a beautiful store front, got rid of the unwanted element on the street, put surveillance everywhere to help keep the bad elements under control, they repaved the sidewalks and got into beautification for the divider between the bridge and the other side of the street. They run a clean, legal operation- a relic in the business once known as a Gentelmen's Club, not a Strip Club.

Comment #7 Posted By: Anonymous 06/19/09

Anonymous

Con'td... Builders and the community boards and the Government will always want to take away the rights and freedoms of others, they want all to benefit their own pockets. I mean really! They give them the right to be there, they spend money to build it, and then they have to fight and pay out constantly to keep it! What a scam! Losing our right to exist as a free democracy! Look at the housing market, stock market, everything is rising in price and we are in an economic state of disaster! This is Why! Scandals today and you tomorrow! Wake up people!

Comment #8 Posted By: Anonymous 06/19/09

Anonymous

For 10 years Scandals has helped lead the way for gentrifying the area. Queens Plaza was a hellhole then. Every great city has its share of great gentleman's clubs. Clubs that have to comply with the law. I have been to clubs all over the world and Scandals is one of the cleanest most hospitable places around. In a liberal town like New York it's a shame that their is even rumor Scandals would be forced to give up the rights the city bestowed on them. The community board definitely doesn't represent all of the community.

Comment #9 Posted By: Anonymous 06/20/09

Anonymous

Queensboro Plaza will never change, It will always be hooker central. Especially now, with NO ONE being able to afford these ridiculous concrete yuppie cages that are sitting idle or are desperately trying to be sold by the out of town suckers that spent their parent's life savings on. Thank you Mayor Bloombag, oh great CEO of NY, for yet another waste of our taxes going to pay for your tax abatements for your rich corrupt pig friends. There's a special place in hell for all of you for what you did to our city.

Comment #10 Posted By: Anonymous 07/10/09

Anonymous

Its a Damn Shame and I believe next year was to be thier 10th year anniversary of being there. I hope they win in court. Its one of the best Strip clubs/Topless clubs/Gentlemens clubs I've been to and I am from that area. Whom next Cityscapes?

Comment #11 Posted By: Anonymous 07/24/09

Anonymous

this Is the best stripclub ever!!! The manager is very nice!!!!! I wish they win the case....

Comment #12 Posted By: Anonymous 11/29/09

Leave a Comment

(optional)
(optional)

The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance or advertisements. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.