Sellers covering monthly charges for buyers
March 17, 2009 12:40PM By Candace Taylor
![]() |
In today's landscape of Manhattan real estate, it's all about price. And increasingly, that doesn't just mean the sale price of an apartment.
More than ever before, potential buyers are focused on condominium common charges and co-op maintenance fees, brokers say, to the point that high monthly costs are now a major deterrent to buyers. In response, sellers -- individuals and developers -- are offering to pay years of maintenance, common charges or real estate taxes for their buyers.
"People are really looking at that monthly nut carefully, now more than ever," said Tom Postilio, a managing director at Core Group Marketing.
Jeffrey Tanenbaum, a vice president at Barak Realty, said high monthly fees are repelling some buyers. "Sometimes the common charges are so scary that [the listing] is getting no calls," he said.
He added that the younger, first-time buyers, who now make up much of the market, tend to be more sensitive to monthly fees. "A first-time buyer is not only looking at price, but maintenance and common charges and tax," he said, adding that he has seen sellers offer to pay one, two or more years of maintenance, common charges or taxes.
In recent years, when jobs were plentiful and hefty bonus checks were virtually guaranteed, buyers seemed happy to pay high monthly fees in exchange for amenities like squash courts, spas and rock climbing walls. That's no longer the case.
In a post-Lehman Brothers world, buyers "focus on what [their] monthly payment is," said Louise Phillips Forbes, an executive vice president at Halstead Property. "'They're saying, 'Wow, my maintenance is $4,400 a month? That's not going down.'"
Some developers are responding to market conditions with maintenance incentives.
Core's Postilio saw such a strategy work well at 246 West 17th Street, a 17th Street Development NY Corp. development his company is marketing, where the top floors of the building have a 421-a tax abatement, but the lower floors, which were built earlier, do not. As a result, a buyer of 1,208-square-foot one bedroom on the first floor would pay yearly taxes of $1,977, while a slightly smaller one-bedroom on the eighth floor carries taxes of $43, according to Streeteasy.com.
Understandably, the units with the tax abatement sold faster than those without it, Postilio said. "The units that remain are the ones that didn't have the tax abatement," he said, prompting the sponsor to reduce the prices of the remaining units by the amount owners of units on the lower floors would pay in taxes during the period of the abatement.
"The sponsors just knocked off what someone would pay in taxes off the asking prices," Postilio said. "It really increased the traffic."'
This kind of arrangement works well because it's often not a huge amount of money for the seller, but buyers breathe easier knowing that their payments will be lower each month.
"It's a way of making the buyer feel more comfortable with a higher-maintenance building," said Paul Purcell, a partner at real estate consultancy Braddock + Purcell and co-founder of the New York City branch of Charles Rutenberg Realty.
Braddock + Purcell recently consulted on a listing for a $995,000 two-bedroom co-op at 151 East 83rd Street where the seller is offering a "maintenance reduction" of $50,000, to be paid in increments of $10,000 over five years, he said. Monthly maintenance on the home is $1,405, according to Streeteasy.com.
Tanenbaum added that today's price-sensitive buyers prefer low maintenance over amenities like a gym or a swimming pool.
While a fitness center, for example, "is nice to have for the day it rains, it's not the allure it once was," he said. "They want to go to Equinox or New York Sports Club. They don't want to use the in-house gym."
That's especially true now that buyers are worried about job security. While outside pet grooming services or spin classes can be canceled if the buyer loses a job, a building's monthly fees aren't negotiable. In fact, they'll likely increase over time.
"They say it's all about price and maintenance," Tanenbaum said. "[Buyers] don't want to live to pay a mortgage."
This phenomenon sometimes even extends to doormen and elevators. Young buyers in particular, accustomed to the relative safety of post-Giuliani streets, don't seem to mind giving up those features if it is a better deal when they go from renting to owning, Tanenbaum said.
"Many rentals come fully loaded, but when you're looking to buy you have to prioritize, and for many people a doorman is not important," he said. "They are just as happy to walk into their building and go up the stairs."
The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.

Comments
Anonymous
Take a look at the problem they are facing in South Florida, they are dropping their price per sf by 50% in some cases, but because they don't have enough people in the building the maint. cost on some of those units have quadrupled and sometimes even more. I think this is a great incentive for people to buy, but prices should come down a bit more for buyers to be motivated.
Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 03/17/09
Anonymous
Just lower the damn price.
Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 03/17/09
Anonymous
Seller paid maintenance charges, seller consessions, gym memberships, etc . Who are you fooling? Eventually sellers and developers won't have any cash left to pay for these items and will have to LOWER THE DAMN PRICE.
Comment #3 Posted By: Anonymous 03/17/09
Anonymous
yet another dumb article....as if people before the financial melt down weren't looking at maintenance costs what a joke it was too expensive then an is too expensive now. If Florida went down 50% look for NYC to drop 30% and then maybe the fees will make sense to a select few.
Comment #4 Posted By: Anonymous 03/17/09
Bruce Cohen
Its easy to say lower the price but in the case of developers they must answer to a higher authority which is the construction lender. So smart sponsors are being creative. I'm not a broker but an attorney who represents buyers and sellers. If someone wants to gamble that prices will go lower then so be it. Wait and you will be right or wrong because nobody really knows. If I told you one month ago banks would show earnings the first two months of the year you would say I was nuts.
Comment #5 Posted By: Bruce Cohen 03/17/09
Anonymous
ok the units on the bottom floor of 246 west 17th are WAY OVERPRICED. THE DEVELOPER IS AN IDIOT WHEN IT COMES TO PRICING
Comment #6 Posted By: Anonymous 03/17/09
Bruce, You mean it would be crazy to think that after wrtining off 2 trillion dollars in bad mortgages and shoring up their balance sheets with billions of tax payer dollars, the banks might be able to squeeze out a couple pennies profit? How crazy!!!
Comment #7 Posted By: 03/17/09
Anonymous
How many people are leaving the city? Better hurry and buy that apartment before seller takes the consessions away and raises prices. How is your business doing bruce?
Comment #8 Posted By: Anonymous 03/18/09
Anonymous
Time to get rid of coop boards and their medievil methods, ie kiss the ring!
Comment #9 Posted By: Anonymous 03/21/09