'Vornado Tornado' gets ready to land
Despite sliding profits, Steven Roth builds up war chest and prepares to go shopping October 01, 2009 07:00AM By Adam Piore
Steven Roth
"Stupid, stupid, stupid cheap." That's how low prices have to fall
before the commercial real estate market hits bottom, Steven Roth, the
chairman of Vornado Realty Trust, predicted earlier this year.
In a letter to shareholders in April, the square-jawed mogul confided, "I think we are now at the third and last stupid."
Not that he's buying yet. But in recent months, the 67-year-old real
estate titan, along with CEO Michael Fascitelli, the other half of the
so-called "Vornado Tornado," has been building a war chest to go
shopping.
And when Vornado gets ready to shop, there's good reason to pay attention.
Long before this down cycle, and before the real estate investment
trust had become the largest single owner of office property in
Washington, D.C., and among the largest in New York City, Roth was
building his fortune by identifying the value in distressed assets.
The Dartmouth grad hit his first grand slam in New Jersey when he won
control of a near-bankrupt discount retail company named after a fan
manufacturer called Vornado. Then he built it with savvy -- and what
the New York Times once called a "bare-knuckled negotiating style that
leaves his opponents gasping"-- into a publicly traded national real
estate empire.
Those same skills will come in handy in the months ahead. Not
since the great bottom-fishing extravaganza of the early 1990s, when
the savings-and-loan crisis flooded the market with distressed real
estate, has cash been so hard to come by.
Then, like now, credit was frozen and those with access to capital had
their pick of assets at fire-sale prices. Those who succeeded, like Sam
Zell, built fortunes and helped fuel a boom in IPOs for REITs in the
years that followed. Now those REITs have matured, and in recent
months, many have been busy raising funds.
Vornado has been one of the most aggressive among them.
Indeed, in recent months, Vornado has been building up a formidable
amount of money. And unlike some REITs, which have been stockpiling
cash to stave off calamity, some believe Vornado may be getting ready
to go on a spending spree.
"A lot of very smart people out there basically think this is a
once-in-a-lifetime opportunity," says Barry Vincour, editor of REIT
Zone Publications, which tracks the industry. "The bottom line is that
Steve and Mike are widely considered among the savviest of the savvy in
REIT land. … And most people would tell you that they expect them to be
in the thick of the hunt for opportunities arising out of the financial
meltdown."
Earlier this year, Vornado began paying its dividends in 60 percent
stock and 40 percent cash, allowing it to stockpile about $400 million
a year.
The move -- which is being replicated by a number of smaller REITs --
is controversial. Some prominent investors in the REIT industry have
complained it will drive capital away by deterring people from buying
stock and say it will create additional drag on already anemic share
prices. (Vornado's share price declined 28.4 percent in 2008, but is up
15 percent so far this year.)
However, Robert Freedman, executive chairman of FirstService Williams,
which does business with Vornado, believes Roth's gambit to raise cash
"should position them exquisitely." He notes that it will create a $1.6
billion war chest over the next four years.
Vornado has also been seeking new investors. Early last spring, the
company offered 12.5 million additional shares to the public, raising
$710 million. Then in June, Vornado announced that it was seeking to
raise an additional $1 billion for a private-equity fund to invest in
distressed properties.
Roth and Fascitelli will oversee the proposed fund, Vornado Capital
Partners LP, aiming to generate returns of more than 20 percent in
office and retail locations in New York and Washington.
"This will be an equity-driven recovery," Roth said at an industry
forum at the Hotel Pierre last April. (He rarely talks to the media and
declined an interview request for this article.) "If you don't have
equity, you're dead."
Of course, it is possible Vornado could use those funds to stave off
calamity. Indeed, the bursting real estate bubble has been punishing
for Vornado. The company's first-quarter profits have slid nearly 70
percent compared to the same period last year, while net income fell to
$125.8 million, down from $389.6 million in the first quarter of 2008.
In a letter to investors earlier this year, Roth acknowledged that poor
performance -- "If we were still school-age, we'd be off to detention"
-- but he emphasized that "our income stream, which comes from 300
buildings and 5,600 tenants, is quite stable."
Just last month, Standard & Poor's Ratings Services lowered
its outlook on Vornado from "stable" to "negative" (though at BBB+, the
rating is still considered investment grade).
Analyst James Fielding cited concerns about Vornado's low-yield cash
holdings and sizable joint venture investments. But he acknowledged
that the company has ''one of the highest cash balances among related
real estate investment trusts,'' and that its portfolio will provide
stable cash flow relative to its peers.
And Vornado's fund-raising activities, while not quite unique, stack up well against their peers.
All told, REITs have issued $16.2 billion in new equity and $2.6
billion in debt this year. Mort Zuckerman's Boston Properties --
another blue-chip REIT -- has raised $840 million.
Roth, who handed over the CEO mantle to Fascitelli this spring, is
likely to be in the thick of the big deals. And for the hard-charging
deal maker, who remains Vornado's chairman, the market of the next
several years should play into the very strengths that helped fuel his
success.
Fanning out
Nowadays, the name Roth is firmly linked to New York's most glamorous social circles.
In addition to heading the city's first and largest REIT (according to
a Crain's ranking last month, Vornado edged out SL Green in total
square footage), his family has strong ties to the artistic heart of
the city: Broadway.
Roth's wife, Daryl, has produced 50 Broadway and Off-Broadway plays
since 1988. Roth's son, Jordan, 33, is a producer in his own right. He
recently finalized a deal to buy an ownership stake in and to lead
Jujamcyn Theaters, which owns and operates five theaters and is the
third-largest landlord on Broadway.
But it wasn't always that way.
Born in the Bronx to a children's clothing manufacturer, Roth graduated
from Dartmouth in 1962, and from business school there one year later.
Two years after that, he convinced a wealthy New Jersey real estate
investor named David Mandelbaum to invest $250,000 to form a
partnership called Interstate Properties.
Roth started buying shopping centers, and repaid Mandelbaum within just about a year.
Then, in 1979, Roth engineered the coup that gave Interstate its stake
in the company they would eventually take public. Two Guys, a modest
national discount retail chain, had acquired the shell company of
defunct fan maker Vornado for tax purposes in 1959.
The stock had a book value of $26, although one analyst estimated the
liquidation value of the company at $35 to $45 a share. The draw was
the land on which the company had built its stores and parking lots,
land located in prime high-traffic areas of Northeastern suburbia.
Roth and his partners, Russell Wight Jr. and Mandelbaum, began snapping up Vornado stock.
When they had enough, they waged an ugly proxy fight. After gaining
control of the company through the board, Roth shuttered the stores and
began developing strip malls (Vornado fans were later revived under
different ownership). Within a little more than a decade, he'd grown
his stable of strip malls to more than 50, in addition to regional
malls.
By 1992, Vornado's earnings had risen sixfold, from $4.3 million in 1981 to $26 million.
But not everyone approved of the human cost. Prizewinning Newsday
columnist Allan Sloan wrote that Roth "put employees on the street,
leased the vacant stores to able operators such as Bradlees and
Wal-Mart, and watched the money roll in."
Roth's negotiating style helped burnish his reputation as an often ruthless operator.
In a 1993 article headlined "No Mr. Nice Guy," Forbes related a tale
typical of the lore surrounding the brash and savvy New Yorker, quoting
one "sophisticated" commercial real estate broker twisted in knots by
Roth in negotiations over a shopping center.
"I had already convinced the client to ask 35 percent less than he
wanted before my first meeting with Roth," the broker said. "Roth was
cordial, but that number that came out of that meeting was down another
20 percent -- 80 cents. I had to go back to my client. He wasn't happy,
but he wanted to sell. So I met with Roth again. Now he wouldn't go
higher than 50 cents. So, no deal.
"You don't mess with Steve Roth. He wants properties for nothing."
Battling Trump
Roth's second big confrontation was with an even bigger fish. This time
it was the department store Alexander's, which was also sitting on the
equivalent of real estate gold. With 11 prime locations, including a
39-acre site at Routes 4 and 17 in Paramus, and a one-square-block
property at 59th Street and Lexington Avenue in Manhattan, the
struggling behemoth had also drawn the attention of other shrewd
investors, including Zell and Sol Goldman.
Roth started his play by acquiring 9 percent of the company's stock in
the early 1980s. By the end of the decade, he'd grown that to a 29
percent stake.
But he wasn't the only one with the idea to grow shares in the company.
By the late 1980s, Donald Trump had obtained 27 percent of Alexander's,
and won himself a seat on the board across from Roth. The pair fought
each other to a standstill about what to do with the real estate, until
finally, in 1992, Trump's fortunes were snared in the real estate bust,
and he turned his stake over to Citicorp to settle an outstanding debt.
Shortly after that, Alexander's declared bankruptcy. Sloan, the Newsday
columnist, labeled it "one of the odder bankruptcies around," noting
that the company had an asset value that greatly exceeded its debt.
"So why file? That way, no one can blame Alexander's board of directors
for closing the stores and putting 5,000 employees on the street,"
Sloan wrote.
"No blame attaches to Alexander's dominant shareholder, a low-profile real estate developer named Steven Roth."
But if Roth could be ruthless, he also demonstrated a disarming quality
not shared by some of his fellow real estate moguls: modesty.
He was willing to admit when he needed help to fill his knowledge gaps, and he was willing to pay for it.
"Not all stupendously gifted people retain the best and the
brightest," Freedman says. "Roth has surrounded himself with the
smartest people."
He noted that Roth's colleagues "are guys with big egos and formidable
skills themselves, mini-Roths, if you will, which is a credit to Roth."
Sandy Lindenbaum, counsel at Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel, and
one of the city's most high-profile land-use attorneys, recalls Roth
following him out to the elevator after a meeting for a deal they were
both involved in.
Roth asked Lindenbaum to represent him. When Lindenbaum said he would
have to get permission from the client he had represented in the
meeting, Roth promised to take care of it.
"That afternoon, I got a check for $25,000 on my desk with a note
saying, 'Okay, now you are representing me,'" Lindenbaum recalls. "He
said to me, 'I'm coming to New York. I know how to build with
toothpicks. I want to learn how to build with steel.'"
It was Roth's decision to convert Vornado into a REIT that gave him the
capital he needed to buy that steel and learn how to build with it.
He took Vornado public in May 1993. By 1995, he had purchased the
controlling shares of Alexander's from Citicorp for $55 million. And by
the fall of 1996, Vornado owned 56 shopping centers and industrial and
office sites totaling 12 million square feet of developed property on
the East Coast.
But Roth's biggest post-REIT investment was in human capital. In
December 1996, he lured Fascitelli away from Goldman Sachs, where he
headed the firm's real estate practice. Fascitelli, a former McKinsey
& Co. consultant, was reportedly earning about $5 million a year as
a partner at Goldman. Roth made him an offer he couldn't refuse: a
five-year, $50 million employment contract that contained a $25 million
signing bonus (along with 1.75 million shares of Vornado stock,
additional options for 350,000 shares of Alexander's common stock, and
a $600,000 annual salary).
It was Michael Jordan-like money, almost unheard of: At the time, the
average pay package, including stock options, for CEOs at Fortune 200
companies was $4.9 million.
However, the hire would prove a savvy move. In Fascitelli, Roth snagged
an industry insider with a fat Rolodex of contacts and the ability to
raise capital.
Vornado tapped that Rolodex immediately. In March 1997, just four
months after Fascitelli signed on, Vornado shelled out $656 million to
buy seven Midtown office buildings (for a total of 4 million square
feet), owned by former Fascitelli client Bernard Mendik.
In a letter to shareholders written shortly after the deal, Roth noted
that he had previously contacted Mendik to try to get him to sell his
portfolio. Mendik never returned Roth's calls. However, "the day after
it was announced that Mike was joining us, Bernie called Mike."
The Mendik deal was just the beginning. Over the course of the next
year and a half, Roth and Fascitelli shelled out $1.7 billion to buy or
invest in 20 buildings in the city.
Among the acquisitions was One Penn Plaza, a building occupying the
block between 33rd and 34th streets and Seventh and Eighth avenues.
With many other buildings in the area, Vornado is now the largest
holder of real estate in the neighborhood around Penn Station.
On top of the old Alexander's site, Roth and Fascitelli built a
55-story, 1.4 million-square-foot office tower and inked Bloomberg L.P.
as an anchor tenant.
Vornado now owns more than 100 million square feet of real estate,
including 28 office properties with 16.1 million square feet in New
York City alone, mostly in Midtown.
Rethinking dreams
For a while, the company had ambitious plans for a massive
redevelopment of the Penn Plaza district, which would have included
moving Madison Square Garden and developing its 5 million square feet
of airspace.
The company also planned to demolish the Hotel Pennsylvania, build a
new tower for Merrill Lynch and expand Penn Station into a nearby post
office. But those plans -- in partnership with the Related Companies --
were scrapped last year, in favor of a more modest renovation that
would add three floors of retail to the hotel and scrap the MSG move.
According to the New York Observer, the firm took a $23 million
writeoff in connection with "abandoning" that project. The abandonment
of that project, along with a project in Boston, and write-downs or
impairments on eight others, "is a performance that we cannot be proud
of," Roth wrote in his letter to shareholders.
He continued, "But ours is a large business and we pursue moneymaking
through multiple acquisitions, transactions, developments, etc.,
predictably some of which will be unsuccessful. As my 92-year-old
father taught me 40 years ago, when he was working and I was just
starting: '… if you don't have any bad debts, you are not doing enough
business.'"
Before the new buying begins, "first we must batten down the hatches
and make sure our house is in order and is strong -- we've already done
that," Roth told shareholders last April. "Then we must determine when
systematic risk has passed -- not quite yet."
In recent months, the company's stock has begun to rebound.
Year-to-date, it's now up 15 percent, compared to 12 percent in the
REIT industry as a whole. Now the question is, when will the fire-sale
purchases start? No way to know. However, when Vornado makes its first
move, it may be as good an indication as any that the market has
reached bottom.
The Real Deal reserves the right to delete any comment it finds to be rude, obscene, racist, sexist, bigoted, irrelevant or repetitive, as well as inappropriate comments about anyone's personal appearance. The Real Deal does not endorse any comments posted on its Web site nor does it verify the veracity of comments or the identity of posters.
Comments
Anonymous
Might I change the word "Stupid" to SENSIBLE? After all, the inflated prices of the past 3-5 years were the stupid numbers, were they not? Stupid were those who fell into the trap of buying at these inflated numbers...and stupid are those who are STILL buying condos at ridiculous prices. NOTHING is worth $5,000 psf...no matter what the brokers say...self-serving as they are. \EVERYONE...hold off until the consensus agrees on a bottom...if you can. Good luck all!
Comment #1 Posted By: Anonymous 10/02/09
Anonymous
A reasonable price for a condo in Manhattan should be around $450-$600psf not $1000. I'm not sayng prices will fall to that but there is plenty of more room to fall.
Comment #2 Posted By: Anonymous 10/02/09