Washington Heights renter prevails in “game changer” case

TRD New York /
Aug.August 14, 2013 02:00 PM

Law firm Kucker & Bruh will have to cough up $22,000 to an 82-year-old Washington Heights tenant, who claimed the firm launched a bogus eviction case against him on behalf of a landlord client — a case said to be the first of its kind.

Rafael Lee, a resident of 810 West 183rd Street, claimed the firm went after him for $1,125 in unpaid back rent.

This was allegedly despite his landlord, Woodfin Properties, collecting a monthly senior citizen rent subsidy that offset his rental costs.

He received a pretrial settlement, plus legal fees, last week.

“I believe this is the first time that a landlord law firm has been sued for this kind of violation,” said Lee’s attorney, James Fishman, referring to federal debt collection laws. “I would call it a game changer in housing court.”

Lawyers from the firm did not respond to requests for comment. Officials from the landlord or managing agent were not immediately available for comment.

Lee has been a tenant at the five-story walkup apartment complex since 1965, according to court documents. His legal rent in March 2012 was about $790.30, but his rent has been fixed at $400.72 per month since 1995, under the Senior Citizen Rent Increase Exemption, documents show.

The dispute started when Woodfin sued Lee to collect $1,125, which included $790 for March 2012, plus eight months of $38 fuel payments and a $30 balance from February. The delinquent notice showed that a $400.72 payment had been made, but was not credited against the balance.

However, Lee’s lawyers submitted evidence that the subsidy should have been properly credited, and the property’s managing agent, Mall Properties, withdrew the eviction case in May 2012. Lee was awarded legal fees but then sued Kucker & Bruh in federal court, claiming they had violated federal debt collection laws.

Kucker & Bruh argued that they made an excusable mistake. But in her ruling, Judge Lorna Schofield said that bill collectors are under strict liability based on federal debt collection law and that the firm did not have adequate procedures to prevent the mistake.

“There is no dispute that the defendants mischaracterized the character, amount and legal status of Mr. Lee’s debt,” Judge Schofield wrote. “Because defendants lacked procedures reasonably adopted to avoid the error, the bona fide error defense of [the statute] does not apply.”

Fishman, a leading tenant lawyer, said that landlords often target seniors or tenants on Section 8 subsidies with frivolous lawsuits. The idea is to force them out of their apartments, deregulate the units, and bring in tenants who can pay higher rent.

“It’s a well known landlord scheme that if you sue somebody repeatedly for non-payment that they’re either going to give up and move out or they’re going to default and get evicted,” he told The Real Deal.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
(Image by Wolfgang & Hite via Dezeen)

Hudson Yards megadevelopment inspires a new line of sex toys

Cammeby's International Group founder Rubin Schron and, from top: 194-05 67th Avenue, 189-15 73rd Avenue and 64-05 186th Lane (Credit: Google Maps)

Ruby Schron lands $500M refi for sprawling Queens apartment portfolio

Wendy Silverstein (Credit: Getty Images)

Wendy Silverstein, co-head of WeWork’s real-estate fund, is out

Realogy CEO Ryan Schneider

Realogy boss on cost-cutting, the competitive landscape and what to look for in 2020

Softbank CEO Masayoshi Son and Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon (Credit: Getty Images)

Goldman Sachs will lead Phase II of SoftBank’s WeWork rescue plan

The Obamas and 79 Turkeyland Cove Road (Credit: Getty Images, Zillow)

Post-presidential pads: After the White House, what comes next?

Former HFZ Capital Group executuve John Simonlaca (Credit: HFZ, iStock)

Meet the HFZ exec accused of taking mob bribes

(Credit: iStock)

Real estate industry decries anti-Semitic remarks recorded at DOB

arrow_forward_ios