City’s landmarking process not worth preserving: experts

But developers, activists have wildly varying takes on how to change the system

New York /
May.May 20, 2014 05:55 PM

The future of landmarking in New York is still unclear, but something needs to change, a group of panelists concluded during a Tuesday morning Crain’s forum on the topic.

Besides the consensus that the system needs to be changed, those on the Crain’s panel on Tuesday morning had strikingly different viewpoints.

Some panelists at the form complained that the city’s Landmarks Preservation Commission doesn’t provide a clear time frame on their decision making process and doesn’t have clear designations for what makes a building or area historic. The panelists representing this developer viewpoint said that landmarking stifles development and economic growth. A recent Real Estate Board of New York Study supported the view, showing that landmarking was hurting housing development, with only five units of affordable housing being created in landmarked districts.

On one hand, those in favor of the policy said that landmarking attracts tourists as well as hi-tech firms, since older buildings are in higher demand than newer, glass buildings from young tech companies.

Nikolai Fedak, founder and editor of New York YIMBY and one of the panelists on Tuesday, argued that the focus should be on the people living in the city.

“Do buildings make up the character of a neighborhood,” Fedak asked, “or do people?”

The commission will soon be headed by Meenakshi Srinivasan, who is the former chairwoman of the New York City Board of Standards and Appeals and an architect. [Crain’s] – Claire Moses


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
The Strand Bookstore and store owner Nancy Bass Wyden (Credit: Getty Images)
Over owner’s protests, city landmarks Strand bookstore
Over owner’s protests, city landmarks Strand bookstore
Revamped design for 550 Madison receives Landmarks’ approval
Revamped design for 550 Madison receives Landmarks’ approval
Revamped design for 550 Madison receives Landmarks’ approval
The Top 10 preservation fights of 2018
The Top 10 preservation fights of 2018
The Top 10 preservation fights of 2018
Eric Adams, Kim Darga
Basement apartment pilot fizzles, showing need for state action
Basement apartment pilot fizzles, showing need for state action
Rendering of 250 Water Street and Howard Hughes’ David O’Reilly (The Howard Hughes Corporation)
Judge stops Howard Hughes’ Seaport project again, citing “quid pro quo”
Judge stops Howard Hughes’ Seaport project again, citing “quid pro quo”
Edward Norton and 441 Willoughby Avenue in Bed-Stuy Brooklyn (Google Maps, Twitter via EdwardNorton, Illustration by The Real Deal)
Historic Bed-Stuy mansion bites the dust
Historic Bed-Stuy mansion bites the dust
Edward Norton with 441 Willoughby Avenue (Getty, Google Maps)
Actor Ed Norton fights plans to turn historic Bed-Stuy mansion into condos
Actor Ed Norton fights plans to turn historic Bed-Stuy mansion into condos
Mayor Steven Fulop (Mayor Steven Fulop)
Jersey City needs developers to make its inclusionary housing work
Jersey City needs developers to make its inclusionary housing work
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...