Chelsea condo developers may be liable for board’s claims

Developer LLC's individual principals can be held accountable in Modern 23 lawsuit, judge rules

TRD New York /
Apr.April 22, 2016 02:00 PM

UPDATED, 6:00 p.m., April 25: The condominium board for the Modern 23 residential building in Chelsea received a boost in its legal battle against the property’s developers. A judge ruled last week that the board may hold the developer LLC’s individual principals liable for breach of contract and breach of warranty claims.

The decision could set a precedent regarding how “[condo] boards with claims against their sponsors may have recourse against the individual principals,” attorney Leni Cummins of Cozen O’Connor, which is representing the Modern 23 board, told the Commercial Observer.

“This is important because very often the sponsor entities are devoid of assets so this allows recourse for the boards and unit owners,” Cummins said. The New York State Supreme Court judge did dismiss plaintiff claims alleging fraud, however.

Despite noting that the decision could set precedent, the Modern 23 board’s lawsuit cites similar instances of “case law” in asserting “claims for breach of contract against the individual defendants” — including a lawsuit filed in 2013 by the condo board of the Palomar building at 266 West 115th Street in Harlem, which found that “a principal of a sponsor may be held separately liable” when “knowingly and intentionally advanc[ing] the alleged misrepresentations of the [condo] offering plan.”

The board of the 14-unit building at 350 West 23rd Street filed suit against the property’s developers – including individual principals Martin Hollander, Arthur Israel and Itzhaki Acquisitions founder Erez Itzhaki – in May 2015, claiming a “willful and fraudulent failure to construct the Modern 23” including construction defects and poor workmanship.

The lawsuit claimed the eight-story property had “a laundry list of defects… that have required, currently require and continue to require remediation or replacement,” and that the developers had allegedly failed to fix the issues despite unit owners’ requests.

The Modern 23’s developers acquired the property for $7.2 million in March 2005 and completed the glassy condo building in 2009. The average sale price of an apartment at the Chelsea property is $2.1 million, according to the lawsuit. [CO]Rey Mashayekhi


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
A lawsuit accuses the Lexington Hotel of negligence for failing to act in emergency (Credit: iStock)

Father’s harrowing tale puts hotels’ liability in spotlight

Joel Schreiber (Credit: Shir Stein and Wikipedia)

WeWork’s first investor used his stock as collateral. Now his lenders are suing him

Caspi Development’s Joshua Caspi, Core Asset Management’s James R. Parks, Hana Financial Investment’s Lee Jin-Kook, and 456 Greenwich

Goodbye bankruptcy, hello construction loan: Breakthrough for Tribeca hotel project

10 Hanover Square (Credit: Google Maps)

FiDi landlord violated rent stabilization regs for years: lawsuit

Adam Leitman Bailey (Credit: iStock)

Adam Leitman Bailey can practice law again

Jerry Rotonda (Credit: LinkedIn)

Former Deutsche Bank exec has defaulted on $3M loan, lawsuit says

297 West 12th Street and Steve Croman (Credit: Google Maps and Getty Images)

Croman backed out of deal over rent-control concerns: lawsuit

261 Broome Street (Credit: iStock and Google Maps)

Tenant’s lawsuit: “Roaches swarmed my bagel!”

arrow_forward_ios