Group alleges Gamma wrongfully rushed foundation work at Sutton Place tower

Issue heads to city's Board of Standards and Appeals

TRD NEW YORK /
Apr.April 06, 2018 04:00 PM

Jonathan Kalikow and a rendering of Sutton 58

When a “conga line” of cement trucks made their way down East 58th Street to complete a foundation for an 800-foot-tall condo tower, the project’s developer didn’t have a permit to close down the thoroughfare, a group of neighbors opposed to the project claims.

Next week Gamma Real Estate will argue before the city’s Board of Standards and Appeals that its project — Sutton 58 — shouldn’t be subject to a rezoning that impacts 10 blocks on the Upper East Side. Crucial to the developer’s argument will be the fact that a majority of the tower’s foundation was completed at the time the rezoning was approved in November — a notion that the East River 50s Alliance challenges.

ERFA, the nonprofit group that launched the rezoning effort, alleges that more than 2,000 cubic yards of concrete was illegally poured at Gamma’s 428-432 East 58th Street. In a letter to the BSA, the organization claims the developer didn’t have the proper permits to close down 58th Street on three dates in November, which allowed a brigade of cement trucks to pour concrete at the site “nonstop.” ERFA also claims that some foundation work was done beyond when after-hours work was authorized by the Department of Buildings and after the City Council approved the rezoning.

DOB records show the project’s general contractor, Lendlease, secured several after-hours work permits at the site, including three after the City Council’s decision to allow for debris clean up. A representative for the city’s Department of Transportation told The Real Deal that Lendlease received initial approval for the road closure but never applied for the full work permit.

Representatives for Lendlease declined to discuss the group’s claims. Calls to Gamma weren’t returned.

“Their letter is based on fiction and doesn’t reflect the facts,” said Jay Neveloff, a partner at Kramer Levin, the firm representing Gamma. He declined to go into further detail. “It’s a nice try by a group showing desperation, but we’re not doing this in the press.”

He noted that his firm will be filing its own letter with the board on Monday.

Under city law, a project can potentially elude new rezoning laws if excavation is complete and there is “substantial progress made on the foundations.” When the City Council approved the changes — which require properties in the area to adhere to “tower on a base” standards — Gamma president Jonathan Kalikow said the tower’s foundation was roughly two weeks away from completion. ERFA alleges that the foundation was only 89 percent complete because Gamma unlawfully rushed to complete the job.

Robert Shepler, ERFA co-chairman, said the City Council already opted not to grandfather Gamma’s project, having removed a clause that the City Planning Commission added. He also argued that rezoned area was an anomaly among residential districts in the city, being that it didn’t have mid-block zoning restrictions.

“This developer was taking advantage of an historical accident,” Shepler said. “He was acting in such great haste and did so wrongfully.”

Shepler said efforts to rezone the area started before Gamma took control of the property from Joseph Beninati’s Bauhouse Group in December 2016, so the developer knew the risk of moving forward with a high-rise condo tower. Kalikow has maintained that the rezoning is driven purely by residents of the Sovereign, a post-war co-op building next door to the construction site, because they feared his project would block their views.

Under the rezoning, buildings in the area face new height restrictions. Specifically, 45 to 50 percent of the building must be built below 150 feet. Bauhouse had planned a nearly 1,000-foot tower for the site. Gamma seeks to build an 800-foot building.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
US Steel’s sprawling South Works site is about the size of Downtown Chicago. At left, Common, who wants to partner with developers on a mixed-use entertainment district there, and Dan McCaffery, whose vision for a 13,000-home community fizzled out. (Credit: Common by Paras Griffin/Getty Images; McCaffery via McCaffery Interests; aerial by Cushman & Wakefield)

South Works, the 415-acre “magnificent property,” is Chicago’s biggest development opportunity

Miki Naftali, Steven Witkoff and Ryan Freedman

TRD Talks: How developers are contending with coronavirus

Mayor Bill de Blasio halted ULURP, stalling projects like 960 Franklin Avenue, Rikers Island and Industry City 

These projects could be held up by New York’s rezoning freeze

Morris Moinian and 1150 6th Avenue (Credit: Noam Galai/Getty Images, Google Maps)

Morris Moinian to sell site of stalled hotel project

An aerial of Flushing's waterfront and New York City Council member Peter Koo (Credit: Google Maps)

Massive Flushing waterfront development stirs opposition

133-25 37th Avenue in Flushing

Developer Gary Tsan buys Flushing property for $60M

From left: 200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York City Council Member Ben Kallos and 430 East 58th Street (Credit: Google Maps, Getty Images)

Midtown East condo tower could face big height cut following court order on 200 Amsterdam

South Carolina town puts moratorium on development (Credit: iStock)

The high cost of low taxes: South Carolina town bans all development for 16 months

arrow_forward_ios
Loading...