A $119B seawall still might not protect Manhattan, critics say

Army Corps of Engineers is studying the plan, which has already attracted opposition

New York /
Jan.January 20, 2020 10:05 AM
Army Corps of Engineers Commander Lt. Gen. Todd Semonite and flooding caused by Hurricane Sandy in 2012 (inset) (Credit: Getty Images)

Army Corps of Engineers Commander Lt. Gen. Todd Semonite and flooding caused by Hurricane Sandy in 2012 (inset) (Credit: Getty Images)

New York could get a $119 billion sea wall to help defend the city from future Sandy-like storms, but the tentative plan has already attracted fierce opposition and criticism.

The barrier is the largest of five options the Army Corps of Engineers is studying to protect the city, according to the New York Times. Supporters say a barrier miles from the Manhattan coastline is the best solution for maintaining New Yorkers’ access to their waterfront while still protecting people, properties and landmarks. However, many environmental and resilience planning experts have described it as an oversimplified idea that doesn’t address multiple serious climate threats, such as storm runoff and flooding from high tides, and could make things worse.

The Corps has stressed that its designs can change and that it is not committed to any of the five options it has been studying.

The fastest and cheapest option the Corps is studying would be a nine-year $14 billion project that would only include shore-based measures. A cost-benefit analysis favors options costing between $43 billion and $47 billion that consist largely of several smaller barriers in places such as the entrances to Newtown Creek, Jamaica Bay and the Gowanus Canal.

“Barriers are a shiny object, a silver-bullet fix luring us away from where [we] need to go,” Paul Gallay, head of the Hudson advocacy group Riverkeeper, told the Times. “The danger of one big wall is that if it fails, we’re all in danger. We need layered solutions.” [NYT] – Eddie Small


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
(iStock/Illustration by Kevin Rebong for The Real Deal)
Who’s judging real estate’s environmentalism? The industry itself
Who’s judging real estate’s environmentalism? The industry itself
Photo via NYCEDC
NYC floats $5B coastline extension in Lower Manhattan climate plan
NYC floats $5B coastline extension in Lower Manhattan climate plan
Mayor’s Office of Climate and Sustainability director Ben Furnas and The Real Deal's Hiten Samtani (Ben Furnas)
Exit interview: New York’s climate chief on reshaping the city
Exit interview: New York’s climate chief on reshaping the city
The floating town of Schoonschip, Amsterdam. (Apple Maps)
In Amsterdam, embracing life on the water
In Amsterdam, embracing life on the water
Clockwise from top left: Council members Kalman Yeger, Ben Kallos, Justin Brennan, Alicka Ampry-Samuel
Council makes it official: Buildings must go electric, J-51 is back
Council makes it official: Buildings must go electric, J-51 is back
(iStock/Illustration by Kevin Rebong for The Real Deal)
Real estate is drunk on ESG. But what’s in the cocktail?
Real estate is drunk on ESG. But what’s in the cocktail?
A rendering of one of the planned towers at Magic City Innovation District in Miami’s Little Haiti neighborhood (Arquitectonica)
Miami redevelopment wave sparks fears of climate gentrification
Miami redevelopment wave sparks fears of climate gentrification
The City Council reached a deal on a bill that will require new buildings with fewer than seven stories to go electric in 2024, and then will apply to buildings taller than that in 2027.
New buildings must go electric under City Council deal
New buildings must go electric under City Council deal
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...