Real estate clashes with climate advocates over proposed fossil fuel ban

Bill would bar natural gas in new buildings, gut renovations

New York /
May.May 28, 2021 08:30 AM
Brooklyn Council member Alicka Ampry-Samuel and Real Estate Board of New York President James Whelan. (Getty)

Brooklyn Council member Alicka Ampry-Samuel and Real Estate Board of New York President James Whelan. (Getty)

In January, Mayor Bill de Blasio vowed to ban fossil fuel hookups in new buildings by 2030. Now, the City Council is trying to bump up that deadline.

The council on Thursday introduced a bill that would effectively bar the use of natural gas in any new building or property that undergoes a major renovation. The measure, sponsored by Brooklyn Council member Alicka Ampry-Samuel, would kick in two years after it passes, several years ahead of de Blasio’s goal.

The proposal is already facing pushback from the real estate industry, which has argued that the costs of forced upgrades would likely be passed along to tenants.

Real Estate Board of New York President James Whelan said the goal of phasing out the use of fossil fuels in buildings is “laudable,” but should follow recommendations being contemplated by state and city advisory groups. For example, the state’s Climate Action Council has floated a five-year phase-out of gas and oil space and water heating in single-family homes, and a 10-year timeframe for multifamily and commercial buildings.

“This legislation ignores these ongoing substantive discussions and instead puts forward a fundamentally flawed proposal that would upend the lives of millions of residents across New York City and significantly increase costs for homeowners and renters,” Whelan said in a statement.

He pointed to the fact that most of the city’s electricity is sourced from fossil fuels, so rushing to electrify new and some existing buildings before more renewable energy is available will not “effectively reduce carbon emissions.”

According to the Urban Green Council, 40 percent of the city’s carbon emissions stem from burning fossil fuels for heat and hot water in buildings.

New York Communities for Change is pushing for the bill to go further, calling on the City Council to make the measure effective within one year rather than two. Peter Sikora, who leads the group’s climate and inequality campaign, said even though the city still relies on fossil fuel sources for electricity, electric heat pumps will improve energy efficiency in buildings.

“Every single gas installation is another blow to the fight against climate change,” he said.

If the bill passes, New York would join other cities in restricting fossil fuel use. In 2019, Berkeley, California, became the first municipality in the country to ban natural gas hookups. Others have followed, including Seattle, which approved a measure in February that prohibits natural gas use for space heating in new commercial and apartment buildings taller than four stories, as well as in older buildings that are replacing heating systems. Last week, the International Energy Agency released a report recommending that sales of fossil fuel boilers should be phased out by 2025.

Details of the City Council bill — including what kind of renovations would trigger restrictions on fossil fuels — are still being hashed out. The measure would bar the combustion of any substance that emits 50 kilograms or more of carbon dioxide per million British thermal units of energy. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, natural gas clocks in at more than 53 kilograms, and heating oil at more than 70.

The City Council bill is the latest clash between the real estate industry and climate advocates as deadlines to comply with the city’s sweeping climate change legislation loom. Under Local Law 97, buildings larger than 25,000 square feet must meet new greenhouse gas emission caps starting in 2024 and even stricter limits by 2030.

Jared Della Valle, CEO of Alloy Development, which is building an all-electric residential building at 100 Flatbush Avenue, said the City Council bill is welcome news. He acknowledged that electrifying older buildings may prove more of a challenge and may not ultimately make sense without a larger overhaul of the building’s envelope. But he thinks there is a strong business case for eliminating fossil fuels.

“Our future generations of renters really care about this issue,” he said. “There is a dire need to address these things now, and there’s no excuse for new construction.”





    Related Articles

    arrow_forward_ios
    Eric Adams (Getty, iStock)
    City program could supplement state rent relief — if next mayor signs off
    City program could supplement state rent relief — if next mayor signs off
    The tenants who won the affordable housing lottery at 15 Hudson Yards say the units are in an “entirely separate part of the building and with a different address.” (Hudson Yards, District Court of New York)
    Lawsuit claims 15 Hudson Yards discriminates with “poor doors”
    Lawsuit claims 15 Hudson Yards discriminates with “poor doors”
    Council members call out City Planning on Soho rezoning
    Council members call out City Planning on Soho rezoning
    Council members call out City Planning on Soho rezoning
    Jared McClain of NCLA and Gov. Phil Murphy (Photos via iStock, NCLA, Getty)
    NJ tenants can pay rent with security deposits: court
    NJ tenants can pay rent with security deposits: court
    According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, around 11.5 million Americans were behind on rent last month. (Getty)
    Four landlords allegedly pushed out 5,000 renters during moratorium
    Four landlords allegedly pushed out 5,000 renters during moratorium
    Democrats look to curtail tax break for “pass-through” businesses
    Democrats look to curtail tax break for “pass-through” businesses
    Democrats look to curtail tax break for “pass-through” businesses
    Gov. Andrew Cuomo and the Surfside condo (Getty, iStock)
    After Surfside, NY state lawmakers call for tighter inspection protocols
    After Surfside, NY state lawmakers call for tighter inspection protocols
    Policy change puts $20 a month in home refinancers’ pockets
    Policy change puts $20 a month in home refinancers’ pockets
    Policy change puts $20 a month in home refinancers’ pockets
    arrow_forward_ios

    The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

    Loading...