Will new restrictions reduce the number of CEQA lawsuits?

City planning is rolling out policy that requires developers to use pre-qualified consultants for EIRs

TRD LOS ANGELES /
May.May 05, 2017 03:45 PM
Jay Ziff

Long before the court decision Tuesday that halted — for a second time — the construction of the Hollywood Target, the NIMBYs fighting the project were optimistic it would happen. When City Council altered the local zoning code to accommodate Target’s 74-foot retail center after the initial ruling, it failed to require an additional environmental impact report, mandated by the California Environmental Quality Act, or CEQA.

For the community residents that sued the city over the project before the height adjustment was made, this was a no-brainer. They would sue again, and they would win — all thanks to CEQA.

Now, city planning is rolling out a new policy that some insiders say could help reduce the volume of CEQA lawsuits in the future. The department will soon require all private developers to use pre-qualified consultants to prepare environmental documents, it announced Thursday. The vetting process for these consultants will begin in June.

“The Department is interested in partnering with environmental professionals who have experience preparing comprehensive and defensible program-level environmental studies, consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act,” city planning spokesperson Cheryl Getuiza said in an email.

With more discretion in the hands of the City, consultants will be less likely to bend to the will of developers and skip steps that protect projects from lawsuits, land use attorney Edgar Khalatian told The Real Deal.

“Frankly, when you see developers lose lawsuits, a lot of the time, it has to do with CEQA,” he said. “What this does is that now developers can’t just hire whoever they want. There are people that push consultants to do [environmental impact reports] a certain way, so this will force them to think twice before wanting to just appease the developer.”

Often times, EIRs are not as thorough as they should be because developers want to breeze through the entitlement process, he added. A quicker EIR, which can cost up to $300,000 per mid-sized project, saves both time and money.

Jay Ziff, a consultant with Environmental Science Associates who is already on the vetted list for public projects, said the pre-qualification could help the city evade being sued over CEQA in the future.

“I think the fact that the city will go through a vetting process and make sure the pool of consultants that they use are people who have a good track record may help improve instances when they’ve had issue with litigation,” he told TRD.

The idea for the list was first introduced in a motion from six City Council members in April 2016. In addition to the drafting of a pre-qualified list of consultants, their proposal asked city planning to create a schedule for updating the city’s 35 community plans.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Armbruster Goldsmith and Delvac's Dave Rand. GPI Companies is seeking SCPE clearance for a 26-story tower that would replace Amoeba Records, while the Weingart Center Association is looking for SCEA approval for its DTLA affordable housing tower

Roll up the red tape: LA developers eye exemptions for CEQA salvation

From left: Saeed Nourmand, Michael Nourmand, Grant King and Richard Heyman

Relevant Group sues Nourmand & Associates’ founder, alleging extortion over hotel projects

Tejon Ranch CEO Greg Bielli and part of the 270,000-acre Tejon Ranch property (Credit: Matthew Dillon via Flickr)

LA County sued for approving 19K home Centennial project

LeFrak Organization looks to fast-track Hollywood mixed-use project

LeFrak Organization looks to fast-track Hollywood mixed-use project

MSG protests Clippers’ bid to streamline environmental review of new arena

MSG protests Clippers’ bid to streamline environmental review of new arena

Clippers shoot for CEQA fast-track rule on Inglewood arena

Clippers shoot for CEQA fast-track rule on Inglewood arena

Millennium Partners thinks CEQA is a drag

Millennium Partners thinks CEQA is a drag

A rendering of the Crenshaw/LAX project (credit: Metro)

State bill would exempt projects tied to 2028 Olympics from CEQA

arrow_forward_ios