“My husband did not scam anyone”: Kyle Richards defends Mauricio Umansky on “Real Housewives” episode

The lawsuit over the Malibu mansion home flip was brought up during an episode of the Bravo reality show

TRD LOS ANGELES /
Jul.July 24, 2019 01:00 PM
Kyle Richards, Mauricio Umansky and the Sweetwater Mesa property (Credit: Getty Images)
Kyle Richards, Mauricio Umansky and the Sweetwater Mesa property (Credit: Getty Images)

“In Beverly Hills, the truth always has a way of rising to the top.”

The tagline Kyle Richards utters at the start of every episode of this season’s “The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills” may be a bit on the nose if it’s referencing her husband’s legal troubles.

To be sure, having a wife on national television has been hugely beneficial to the Agency co-founder Mauricio Umansky. The exposure has provided free advertising for the company, while showcasing some of the agent’s pricier listings.

But the limelight was unwanted on Tuesday evening, when the lawsuits surrounding Umansky were brought up during the reunion episode of Bravo’s “Real Housewives of Beverly Hills.”

The drama started when host Andy Cohen said he had a question from a viewer, “Amy from Texas.” “I guess Kyle isn’t going to mention Mauricio scamming someone out of $37 million when she can just talk about Dorit’s [co-star] dog,” Amy asked through Cohen.

“My husband did not scam anyone,” Richards said. “That causes problems because my husband has never made $36 million in a deal in his life. That’s what the property sold for.”

She added: “so your question from, whoever the fuck Monty in Magootville, saying my husband is scamming people $36 million… that’s a misleading question. The way it was worded is damaging and I don’t appreciate that.”

The backstory: Umansky is facing a lawsuit from the vice president of Equatorial Guinea, who is alleging he misrepresented the value of his mansion in Malibu when he sold it in 2015. Umansky and a partner, Mauricio Oberfeld, bought the home for $33.5 million that year. They flipped it for $70 million a year later, raising allegations of impropriety.

It’s possible the lawsuit could drag in Richard’s fellow “Housewives” on the show. In May, the man suing Umansky filed court documents to seek “communications with any of the performers, producers, directors, writers, or any other persons affiliated” with the television show. The request was made because Umansky and Richards hosted a “Great Gatsby”-themed party at the Malibu property during filming of the show’s seventh season.

A spokesperson for the Agency declined to comment.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Do pocket listings have their place in the LA market?

Do pocket listings have their place in the LA market?

Inset: Alice Vysata (Credit: Wikipedia, iStock)

“From one day to the next, he stripped me of everything:” Sexual harassment lawsuits against LA landlord set off legal battle

Mauricio Umansky (Credit: Getty Images)

5 things we learned from Reddit’s obsession with Mauricio Umansky

EB-5 investor claims his money was redirected from Hilton to housing project

EB-5 investor claims his money was redirected from Hilton to housing project

Mohamed Hadid and his Bel Air spec mansion (Credit: Getty Images and Manatt, Phelps & Phillips via Curbed)

Mohamed Hadid’s controversial Bel Air spec mansion gets court-ordered downsize

Bait and switch: Century 21 agent sued after promising vacant lot was an “an acre”

Bait and switch: Century 21 agent sued after promising vacant lot was an “an acre”

Agency broker duped Burbank homeowner into taking out commercial loan: lawsuit

Agency broker duped Burbank homeowner into taking out commercial loan: lawsuit

Mauricio Umansky hit with 2nd lawsuit over massive Malibu mansion

Mauricio Umansky hit with 2nd lawsuit over massive Malibu mansion

arrow_forward_ios