Westlake abandoned its affordable housing requirements a decade ago. Things have changed

Affordable housing requirements in Westlake have been dormant since 2009

Oct.October 08, 2019 11:00 AM
 LA City Councilmember Gil Cedillo and Jade Enterprises’ Sapphire development (credit: Scott L on Flickr)
LA City Councilmember Gil Cedillo and Jade Enterprises’ Sapphire development (credit: Scott L on Flickr)

About a decade ago, Westlake abandoned its affordable housing requirements for developers, after one prominent developer Geoff Palmer, appealed.

With Los Angeles’ housing crisis growing ever worse, things have changed.

Now, the city is looking to formally reinstate that a so-called “inclusionary zoning rule” that would again require developers to include affordable units.

The requirement was set aside years ago following an appeal by Palmer — a prolific multifamily developer — but changes to state law since then mean the requirement is valid again. The city has been enforcing it for the last year and now Councilman Gil Cedillo wants an ordinance to formalize that, according to Curbed.

The ordinance would add clarifications to planning documents regulating development in the neighborhood, and phase in the affordable requirements over a 120-period following its adoption to ease the burden on developers.

The inclusionary zoning requirements date to 1991. They require developers to reserve a certain percentage of new units for low-income renters. In 2009, Palmer challenged the requirement in state court after the city decided he must reserve some low-income units at his 350-unit Piero II project.

Palmer successfully argued that inclusionary zoning violated the Costa-Hawkins Rental Housing Act of 1995, which regulates rent rules across the state. In late 2017, the state passed Assembly Bill 1505, amending Costa-Hawkins and allowing for inclusionary zoning.

The city started to enforce inclusionary zoning last year, but there’s still some debate over the requirement. L.A.’s Transit Oriented Communities program encourages affordable construction near transit by providing developers who build there with incentives. But it doesn’t require the construction of affordable units.

In Westlake, developer Jade Enterprises planned its 369-unit apartment in the neighborhood, presuming the rule was not in effect. But last year, the city decided Jade must set aside 15 percent of the units as affordable, or about 55 units.
Jade successfully appealed the decision and is moving ahead without affordable units. [Curbed] — Dennis Lynch

Related Articles

The Gabay brothers want to bring back District Square (Credit: Department of City Planning via LA Times)

Gabay lawsuit to revive District Square may have merit

From left: Community Preservation Partners President Anand Kannan and Jonathan Rose Companies founder: Jonathan F.P. Rose, with the Golden West Tower Apartments (Credit: Google Maps and iStock)

Affordable developer teams up to buy Torrance senior housing complex

Regulatory fees are culprit in housing building costs (Credit: iStock)

It costs $500K to build one affordable housing unit in LA

A rendering of the project (Credit: Ian Espinoza Associates vis Urbanize)

Westfield adds affordable units to $1.5B Promenade redevelopment

Developers Mark and Arman Gabay are suing the city for rejecting their 577-unit District Square project in South L.A. (Credit: Department of City Planning via LA Times)

Gabays sue LA after it rejects their 577-unit resi project

Dr. Jayasinghe and a rendering of the project (Credit: Metro via Curbed)

Metro rejects plastic surgeon’s 907-unit development in Westlake

LA city council members want to close “loophole” in rent control law

LA measure would make it tougher for landlords to force out tenants for renovations

LA Chamber of Commerce, under CEO Maria Salinas,  explores ballot measure doubling density of resi buildings. (Photo credit: iStock Photo, LA Chamber of Commerce.)

LA Chamber of Commerce explores doubling density of resi buildings