Tax reform could cost US homebuyers

Doubling the size of the standard deduction could be bad news in disguise for owners

TRD MIAMI /
Apr.April 07, 2017 12:45 PM

With the health care bill back-burnered on Capitol Hill, the focus has shifted to tax reform. Among the key financial matters in play: Homeowners’ prized mortgage interest and property tax deductions.

Though no major version of a reform bill would eliminate the mortgage interest deduction, the House Republicans’ tax legislative “blueprint” would essentially side-step it by doubling the current standard deduction from $12,600 to $24,000 for joint filers ($12,000 for single filers).

With that large of a standard deduction, the vast majority of homeowners now claiming the write-off would likely stop itemizing. Tax experts estimate that 84 percent of the 45 million taxpayers who would otherwise itemize in 2017 would opt for the enlarged standard deduction under the blueprint instead. The proposal also would repeal most tax deductions and credits — including those for state and local taxes — and would compress today’s seven marginal tax brackets into three: 33 percent, 25 percent and 12 percent.

The blueprint has the backing of House Speaker Paul Ryan and is considered the foundational document for tax reform this year. President Trump floated a somewhat similar plan during the campaign, and the White House is expected to outline a new version in the coming several weeks. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin says tax reform is on a fast track and could be wrapped up by the August congressional recess. That timetable is widely viewed as unrealistic, but some form of tax bill could be passed later this year or in 2018.

So what does all this mean for you if you’re thinking of buying a house or you already own one and itemize deductions including mortgage interest? Is there reason for concern? Home building and real estate advocates are emphatic that the answer is yes. Doubling the size of the standard deduction may sound seductive — it would simplify tax returns for millions of Americans — but could be bad news in disguise for first-time buyers, existing owners and homeownership in general.

That’s because in their view it would dilute the long-standing special status conferred upon homeownership by the federal tax code. There would be no different tax treatment for you whether you owned a home or rented. Plus the tax benefits of ownership that are now baked into home prices would dissipate over time, leading to declines in property values.

Listen to how Jerry Howard, CEO of the National Association of Home Builders put it to me in an interview: “From the inception of the tax code, our public policy has been consistently in favor of incenting people to buy homes.” To water down that benefit now by eliminating the tax incentive to purchase and own a home for most taxpayers, he believes, would be a social and economic mistake.

In a recent presentation on tax reform, Evan Liddiard, senior tax policy representative for the National Association of Realtors, said the blueprint would “nullify the tax benefits of homeownership.” He offered a hypothetical example: A young couple in Utah with one child and a household income of $61,000 took out a mortgage of $163,000 two years ago. Currently they can deduct $7,160 in mortgage interest, $1,189 in local real estate taxes, $1,304 in mortgage insurance and $2,250 in other state and local taxes. Under the tax code today their net tax benefits of owning a home came to $1,185 in 2016. Under the blueprint that would drop to zero. Even taking the enlarged standard deduction, their 2016 tax liability would be $2,940, compared with $2,325 under current law.

Not all tax experts agree with the builders’ and realty advocates’ dark forecasts, however. Joseph Rosenberg, a senior research associate at the independent Tax Policy Center, says he “would be skeptical about any analysis” indicating that the combination of tax code changes proposed in the blueprint would have dramatic effects on homeownership.

“The most plausible effect,” he said, might be on home values, where academic studies have concluded that tax benefits have been “capitalized” into home prices over time, though estimates vary about how much the increment may be.

Bottom line: Keep an eye on tax reform, but be aware that nothing is going to change overnight — major tax bills always have phase-in periods. And given the current deep fissures on Capitol Hill between and within the major parties, a complex piece of legislation loaded with other minefields besides homeowner tax benefits may simply be beyond the abilities of the current crop of lawmakers and this White House.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Alan Ojeda and 8894 NW 44 Street in Sunrise (Google Maps)

Rilea Group scores $46M construction loan for Sunrise apartments

Rilea Group scores $46M construction loan for Sunrise apartments
Yard 8 and Wood Partners CEO Joseph Keough (Courtesy of ACRE)

Wood Partners lands $86M refi for Midtown Miami apartments

Wood Partners lands $86M refi for Midtown Miami apartments
Masoud Shojaee and a rendering of Shoma Village 

Shoma Group scores $67M loan for mixed-use Hialeah project

Shoma Group scores $67M loan for mixed-use Hialeah project
Housing Trust Group CEO and president Matt Rieger and Hudson Village renderings

HTG scores financing for Hollywood affordable housing project

HTG scores financing for Hollywood affordable housing project
 Rendering of Father Marquess-Barry Apartments with Matt Rieger

HTG scores financing for senior affordable housing in Overtown

HTG scores financing for senior affordable housing in Overtown
Fortune International Group’s Edgardo Defortuna, Château Group’s Manuel Grosskopf and a rendering of the project

Fortune and Château score $119M refi for Sunny Isles condo project

Fortune and Château score $119M refi for Sunny Isles condo project
Rendering of the project and from left: Vince Signorello, Ricardo Caporal and Greg West

Zom Living, partners score $57M loan for Ludlam Trail project

Zom Living, partners score $57M loan for Ludlam Trail project
6405 West Boynton Beach Boulevard rendering, Pebb Enterprises President and CEO Ian Weiner

Sprouts-anchored mixed-use project in Boynton Beach scores $27M loan

Sprouts-anchored mixed-use project in Boynton Beach scores $27M loan
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...