The Real Deal New York

NYC should implement 2 percent tax cap: OPINION

Limitations already in place in the rest of the state

March 27, 2015 11:42AM

Martha Stark Bill de Blasio

From left: Martha Stark and Bill de Blasio

New York City should adopt a bill that would limit the increase on annual property taxes to 2 percent, Martha Stark, professor and former commissioner of the city’s Department of Finance, wrote in an editorial for Crain’s.

Stark wrote that while Mayor Bill de Blasio opposes the bill, which was recently passed by the state senate, it would be “more responsible and honest” than the current city tax policy.

“A cap could also improve transparency and fairness,” she wrote. De Blasio, in turn, argues that the measure would deprive the city of millions of dollars.

Since 2004, Stark said, taxes paid by property owners rose by 84 percent to $22.6 billion from $12.2 billion.

“The average homeowner’s annual tax bill has risen to $4,607 from $2,354. Even during Mr. de Blasio’s short time in office, the property-tax levy has increased by $1.3 billion, and will increase this year by another $1 billion,” Stark wrote.

With a cap in place, more residents would be able to enjoy rising property values without having to shoulder a subsequent spike in property taxes. [Crain’s] — Claire Moses

 

 

  • TAX OUTRAGE

    How convenient a tax cap is for those with low taxes! So those who buy in a new building must pay 3-20x the real estate taxes of their protected neighbors? So those in the new buildings have to pay the difference of the City’s budget needs? Where is the Constitutional right that says a select group’s taxes stay low and don’t increase by more than 2% per year no matter how much more valuable their property becomes? So Mayor De Blasio is entitled to a maximum 2% increase in real estate taxes even though his house in Park Slope pays under $3,000 per year while similarly valued homes in New York pay TRIPLE that or more? So some people should cover paying what the ‘lucky chosen few’ should not pay….just because? Absurd! Taxes should be equally and equitably distributed. This is selective and discriminatory without rhyme or reason.

MENU