The Real Deal New York

Massive City Point development’s use of nonunion workers irks critics

January 22, 2013 08:30AM

A rendering of the second phase of the City Point development

The mammoth City Point development in downtown Brooklyn has become a battleground over the use of nonunion workers, the Wall Street Journal reported.

The 1.8 million-square-foot project is being built on city-owned land and receives affordable housing subsidies. Washington Square Partners, which along with Acadia Realty Trust is developing the 670,000-square-foot retail space, told the Journal that construction would involve at least some nonunion workers in order to cut costs, expedite work and use more minority, local and female workers. Developers added that a portion of the 700-unit apartment project would also hire nonunion workers.

“We’re beginning to really have a good group of highly qualified competitive minority contractors,” Paul Travis of Washington Square Partners told the Journal. “If you looked at a job like this 10 years ago, the world has really changed.”

The first phase of the project, which saw regular protests from the unions, employed 180 nonunion workers, of which 41 percent were local and 82 percent were minorities. The second phase of the project will see the construction of a retail space that will include a Century 21 and a market hall with food vendors, as well as 565 units of market-rate housing and 125 units of affordable housing.

The second phase is expected to create roughly 3,780 jobs, but the developers’ plans to hire nonunion workers have sparked outrage among the unions, which see the move as a breach of responsibility.

“I don’t know why the city, the [Economic Development Corp.] and Acadia, how they think that that’s fair after they received all the taxpayer money that they have,” said Terry Moore, of Metallic Lathers and Reinforcing Ironworkers Local 46.

City Point’s decision continues a recent trend that has seen major developers such as Equity Residential, Toll Brothers and the El Ad Group hire nonunion workers for major construction projects. [WSJ] –Hiten Samtani

  • Herb Greenwood

    I live across from the development site on Albee Square. It’s been a living hell these past three years, with this year being the worst. Noise 7 days a week, 24 hrs. a day. Ignoring all decency for quality life to the surrounding residents…US. For the past six months a diesel generator truck has been spewing black noxious fumes into our apartments. When confronting the gate keeper, I was brushed off and said he could care less if I called 911 for the condition. These developers have no respect for anyone or anything. They’re a TERRIBLE example of urban renewal.

  • Torkil Heggstad

    This developer shows no concern for its neighbors. If only they would inform us of the time they need to work extra we would be much more understanding. The whole block only has two buildings with apartments and that is where they have placed their entrances to the site so that there is noise from work for one to two hours before the allowed 7 am starting time almost every day. When confronting the workers about working at illegal hours they charged that they had a variance for 24 hours a day, but the reality is that the only variance they have posted (interestingly placed the furthest away from foot traffic and apartment buildings as possible) is a temporary variance for extending weekday work hours from 6 pm to 10 pm and also weekend work. It is troubling that a developer who builds on public land and receives subsidies is allowed to continually break the law. The least the public could demand in these instances is that workers are protected through unions and that neighbors are protected from violations of the law. Development will of course cause disruptions (our building is full of cracks from it, due to brute force methods that probably saved them dollars, but caused a lot of unnecessary shaking of the ground), but it is good neighborly practice to inform and to try to limit disruptions.

MENU