The Real Deal New York

Times Square Marriott Marquis sold in controversial $20M deal

December 12, 2013 03:27PM
By Katherine Clarke

marriott-pic-final

Host’s W. Edward Walter, the Marriott Marquis and John Liu

The holders of a 75-year-lease for the Marriott Marquis Hotel in Times Square have opted to buy the hotel from the state-run Empire State Development Corporation for a mere $19.9 million — in a transaction that city Comptroller John Liu called “one of the worst deals since Manhattan was sold for $24.”

Host Hotels & Resorts, an owner of numerous Marriott-operated hotels, closed on title to the property on Tuesday, according to public records filed with the city today. EDS did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Host has leased the property since 1982, when it entered a deal with both the ESDC and the city for the premises at 1535 Broadway between 45th and 46th streets. Under the agreement, Host would pay $34 million for the hotel, transferring title immediately back to the city, and then pay the city rent each year for 75 years. Host also had an option to repurchase the property for fair market value once the lease expired.

In 1998, the parties amended the agreement, shortening the lease term to 40 years — so it would expire in 2017 — and providing Host a chance to buy the building for a fixed $19.9 million as soon as 2013.

“If these reports are accurate, it is no surprise that anyone would want to snap up that prestigious New York City property for such a relative pittance, and just in time for Christmas,” Liu said in a statement to TRD today. “But this corporate giveaway was a horrendous deal for City taxpayers that could have and should have been renegotiated.”

Earlier this year, in an audit of the deal, Liu said the building was really worth close to $200 million, but recent deals suggest it could be worth much more.

In a statement to The Real Deal, a Host spokesperson defended the price it paid to take title back on the property, noting that its long-term investment created 1,500 jobs and brought in millions in tax dollars.

“The purchase price reflects the fact that Host has paid over $1 billion to the city and state in rent, taxes and acquisition costs since the project began, including every penny owed under its ground lease. The bottom line is that we have paid all sums due under the terms of the lease agreement,” the spokesperson said.

Meanwhile, Vornado Realty Trust, inked a 20-year deal to lease the retail space below the tower last year and will spend as much as $140 million to expand the retail component of the property, converting the underground parking lot into additional selling space and creating a six-story, 300-foot-long LED sign, as previously reported. The lease gives Vornado the option to buy the retail in the future at a price to be determined by the cash flow of the space.

In recent hotel transactions in and around Times Square, private equity firm the Rockpoint Group last year paid $275 million, or more than $400,000 a key, for a 665-room hotel at 790 Seventh Avenue, and a partnership of Apollo Global Management and Chartres Lodging Group bought a 480-room at 226 West 52nd Street for $94 million, or less than $200 a key.

The 58-story, 1.8 million-square-foot Marriott Marquis has close to 2,000 rooms and features 100,000 square feet of meeting space.

7 Responses to “Times Square Marriott Marquis sold in controversial $20M deal”

  1. December 12, 2013 at 4:34 pm, 1Lionel said:

    Liu can bleat for as long as he wants but those were the terms. One can hardly blame Marriott for effecting it now.

    • December 12, 2013 at 4:53 pm, Mike said:

      Plus people forget everyone thought Marriott was crazy for building the hotel at the time – very different world now both in terms of hotel valuations AND attractiveness of Times Square!

  2. December 12, 2013 at 4:48 pm, ATNY@ THEMMQ said:

    The city should be thankful that this
    project ever happened. And the results
    keep pouring in as values have skyrocketed in the 30 years since the insane
    idea of breaking ground at the crossroads.
    I think Marriott’s position should not only include the numbers of jobs
    & taxes paid but more importantly, the aggregate value of the entire area
    since inception of their deal. The city
    is as much the winner as Marriott. Liu
    missed his chance to show the rest of the city what corporate progress through
    investment, with just a little help from government can actually produce. Government MUST Stop taxing and start
    supporting, the results will come!

  3. December 12, 2013 at 4:58 pm, Cedar Cat said:

    When the lease was negotiated, Times Square was full of porn shops, prostitutes and drug addicts. Having said that, this does seem to be a deal that is sweet in the extreme for the corporate owners, and a horrible deal for the city. Whoever signed for the $19.9 million should be tracked down. Purchase option should have been FMV at a point in time.

    • December 14, 2013 at 7:03 pm, CaveJohnNYC said:

      by 1998 Times Square was pretty cleaned up…but yes, bad deal

  4. December 13, 2013 at 10:12 am, West 40's resident said:

    Comptroller Liu is misinterpreting and misrepresenting the 1982 lease agreement thirty years too late.

    This hotel was first proposed in the early 1970′s and took until 1985 to complete.

    When the project was proposed and built, Times Square was a deteriorated and crime ridden area. Broadway Theaters and the Theater District were dying. There was more crime on 42nd Street between 7th and 8th Avenues than any single block in the entire country.

    The development of this hotel was seen as and proved to be a lynchpin of a larger Times Square redevelopment project. The developers of the hotel invested over $320 million dollars, in 1985 dollars, building the hotel. They paid for the hotel at that time.

  5. December 13, 2013 at 5:22 pm, Tom18 said:

    Typical Host deal and Marriott deal. Screw anyone you can over. Liu caught on to this outrageous “sweetheart: deal and tried to rectify it. Too bad he did not succeed.

comment form

You must be logged in to post a comment.

MENU