The Real Deal Miami

Posts Tagged ‘irs’

  • A foreclosure escape hatch?

    Even if new bill makes it through Congress, "hardship" withdrawal route should be last resort
    October 14, 2011 01:56PM

    With hundreds of thousands of homeowners facing imminent foreclosure and estimates of 2 million or more in the wings, are there any financial tools available to distressed borrowers that haven’t been tried yet? Equally important politically: Is there a way to help owners that won’t rack up huge federal expenditures and add to the deficit?

    The Obama administration has been exploring options — including a new refinancing program expected later this month — but a concept has surfaced on Capitol Hill that might offer modest help with no revenue cost to the government: Amend the tax code to allow homeowners who have 401(k) retirement plans to pull out money to save their houses from foreclosure without the usual tax penalties. [more]

    Comments
  • Can the Internal Revenue Service handle tax credit programs that pump out billions of dollars to homeowners and buyers? A new federal investigation on home energy tax credits suggests the answer may be: not quite yet. The Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration audited the residential tax credit program created by Congress to encourage homeowners to install energy-saving equipment and materials in their houses, and found some disturbing oversights. One part of the program offers 30 percent credits — with no dollar limit — for solar energy systems, geothermal heat pumps, wind turbines and fuel cells installed before Dec. 31, 2016. A second part of the program — for energy-efficiency home improvements — offered credits up to $1,500 for qualifying exterior windows and doors, insulation and roofing materials. [more]

    Comments
  • Homebuyers begin to repay tax credit

    February 15, 2011 01:28PM

    Most homebuyers who claimed the federal tax credit of up to $7,500 for buying their first home in 2008 are required to start repaying the credit in 15 annual installments, beginning with their 2010 tax returns, according to the National Association of Homebuilders. The credit — which was offered for qualified home purchases in 2008, 2009 and 2010 — has different repayment rules depending on when the home was purchased and as tax season approaches, this may cause confusion. “It is important that homebuyers consult a qualified tax professional to make sure they are receiving all the tax benefits as well as fulfilling the obligations of their home purchase,” said Bob Nielsen, chairman of the NAHB and a home builder from Reno, Nev. The Internal Revenue Service is sending a letter to taxpayers who claimed the credit that explains the repayment options. The credit for homes purchased in 2009 and 2010 does not have a repayment requirement unless the home ceases to be used as the taxpayer’s principal residence within three years of the purchase. The homebuyer tax credit program expired for the majority of Americans in 2010, with some exceptions, such as service members who were on duty. TRD

    Comments
  • The federal homebuyer tax credit programs have been widely praised for stimulating real estate sales, but also reviled by critics who see the credits as a multibillion-dollar waste of the government’s money. 
    Now a new audit raises questions about the ability of the IRS to handle key basics of the programs, such as determining the year credit claimants actually purchased their houses, whether they have retained the property as a principal residence, and even if they were alive when a tax credit application was submitted in their name. 
    The audit by the Treasury Department’s inspector general for tax administration praised the IRS for its recent efforts to develop a “comprehensive strategy” to keep track of the credit programs but identified deficiencies in a small but significant number of cases involving claims for credits. 
    For example, auditors found that the IRS has had trouble distinguishing between houses purchased during 2008 and those bought in 2009. This can be an important distinction since first-time purchasers in 2008 were limited to tax credits up to $7,500 that must be repaid annually over a 15-year period. By contrast, purchasers who opted to claim a revised version of the credit during 2009 — for up to $8,000 — were not subject to the annual repayment requirement. 
    Out of approximately 1.77 million credit filings during 2009, auditors said they identified 73,119 individual returns from taxpayers who received credits whose account records at the IRS had incorrect — or no — purchase dates: 
    – 59,802 recipients who purchased their homes in 2009 were incorrectly recorded by the IRS as having purchased during 2008, or no year was identified. 
    – 9,122 credit recipients actually bought their homes during 2008, but the IRS recorded the purchases as occurring in 2009. This could result in potential tax revenue losses to the government of nearly $31 million, auditors estimated, since these individuals might not be asked to repay the homebuyer credit over 15 years even though their 2008 purchase date required them to do so. 
    – 4,195 recipients’ claim forms had no purchase date stated or the purchase occurred prior to 2008. “These claims should not have been processed,” auditors said. 
    Beyond these claims, a total of 514,987 tax credit requests contained purchase dates that “cannot be verified” because the data were not “captured” by IRS computers. 
    The Treasury’s inspector general also focused on another set of problems: The IRS’ lack of systems to enforce the various “recapture” and “accelerated repayment” provisions that Congress included in the housing tax credit programs. 
    “Currently, the IRS does not have the ability to identify individuals” who received the homebuyer credit but subsequently may not retain the property as their principal residence — a key requirement imposed by Congress. For the $7,500 credit covering purchases made from April 9, 2008, through Jan. 30, 2009, recipients who sell the home before the end of the 15-year payback period are expected to repay the credit to the IRS “immediately” — on the tax filing for the year in which the home is sold. 
    In the case of the 2009-era credits — up to $8,000 for first-time buyers, $6,500 for qualified repeat purchasers — the credit must be repaid if the home is sold within three years of acquisition. The repayment is due on the taxpayer’s return filed in the year of the sale. Because the IRS has no systems in place to detect early sales or conversions of properties from principal residences, auditors said, it must rely on individuals to disclose such information voluntarily. The agency is now developing systems to keep track of repayment and recapture events using third-party sources of real estate and other data, said the report. 
    Auditors also found the IRS has no system at present to identify situations that allow certain taxpayers to bypass recapture rules, such as the death of the homeowner, foreclosures where there is no gain to the taxpayer, and extended overseas duty assignments of armed forces and other personnel that prevent them from occupying their houses. 
    Still another deficiency, auditors said, is IRS’ handling of homebuyer tax credit claims from applicants using the Social Security numbers of dead people. In the 2008 credit program, the audit identified 1,326 individuals who claimed a total of $10.1 million when the home purchase date occurred after the purported claimant’s date of death. 
    In 951 claims the individual whose Social Security number was used had been dead for at least half a year. The IRS denied 528 of the 1,326 total claims — worth about $4 million — but 798 claimants using dead persons’ Social Security identifications apparently received credits. The IRS has agreed to audit those 798 tax returns, according to the inspector general’s report. 
    Ken Harney is a real estate columnist with the Washington Post.

    [more]

    Comments
  • Nearly 1,300 incarcerated prisoners — 241 of whom were serving life sentences — were among those who received the popular federal homebuyer tax credit nationwide, according to a report released today by the Treasury Inspector G [more]

    Comments
  • For struggling commercial property owners, loan modifications can be answered prayers, but without proper tax planning, all hell may break loose come April 15, 2010.

    That’s because income from debt cancellation is taxable, something that is often overlooked as owners scramble to ward off financial ruin. Uninformed real estate owners could find themselves in financial peril when they file their IRS tax returns and owe hundreds of thousands of dollars in unexpected taxes they cannot afford to pay.

    Consider the big picture: Commercial loan defaults are posting record-high rates — and momentum is moving toward worsening default rates in 2010. Real Estate Econometrics expects the default rate to rise to 5.2 percent by the end of 2010.

    All this means heightened possibilities for commercial lenders working with overleveraged property owners to forgive a debt rather than waste more resources chasing insolvent borrowers. [more]

    Comments
  • FBI raids receiver’s office

    October 12, 2009 02:40PM

    The offices of Miami attorney and accountant Lewis Freeman were raided Friday by agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the latest step in the high-profile figure’s troubles with the government. The reason for the search remains sealed because criminal charges have not been filed. Freeman, who often serves as a receiver for bankrupt businesses and investors, sued the Internal Revenue Service in August over a $4.5 million civil assessment against him, but Fort Lauderdale tax litigator Martin Press, a partner with Gunster, said it’s unusual for the FBI to be raiding an office of someone involved in tax disputes. [GlobeSt]

    Comments