Murky mass transit future clouds Hudson Yards plans

TRD NEW YORK /
May.May 09, 2008 04:03 PM

Hudson Yards is 26 acres of riverside Manhattan property that for years has been the last, best piece of undeveloped property in the city. And after Tishman Speyer’s $1 billion bid to develop the massive site collapsed yesterday, it could remain undeveloped as long as questions about mass transit go unanswered.

It’s still unclear whether concerns over a planned extension of the 7 line helped derail the deal. But uncertainty over the extension, which would take the 7 line from Times Square to Eleventh Avenue, ominously clouds the site, experts say.

Hudson Yards is hard to reach from Midtown (and hard to build, with a $2 billion platform needed over the rails). And without a link to Midtown, it’s hard to picture big companies or residents flocking to the area.

The city has issued $2.1 billion in bonds to pay for the 7 extension. But neither the city nor the MTA had committed to fund cost overruns, though MTA executive director Elliot Sander had suggested in recent months that it had worked out an informal understanding with the city.

Without clarity on whether new bonds or MTA dollars would fund any cost overruns, developers have reason to worry about getting stuck with buildings underway and the 7 extension at a standstill.

To compensate Tishman if the 7 extension didn’t happen on schedule, MTA spokesman Jeremy Soffin told The Real Deal today that the proposed deal included penalizing the MTA for any delays. He said that under the structure the MTA proposed, Tishman would get “rent holidays” — periods during which it would not have to make agreed-upon payments to the MTA, which would still own the land — “depending on the length of delay.”

Assemblyman Richard Brodsky, a critic of the redevelopment plan, told The Times that the 7 train was one reason the deal might have fallen apart, which Soffin denied.

“This was not the cause of the impasse,” Soffin said.

As crucial as extending the 7 line is, eventually developers will have no choice but to develop the area, said Andy Gerringer, who heads new development for Prudential Douglas Elliman.  

“In the foreseeable future, the viability of the far West Side hinges on the 7 line,” he said. “As Manhattan runs out of sites, developers will have to go there, with the 7 line or not. You just may not have the value or appeal to commercial guys.” 


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
(Image by Wolfgang & Hite via Dezeen)

Hudson Yards megadevelopment inspires a new line of sex toys

Cammeby's International Group founder Rubin Schron and, from top: 194-05 67th Avenue, 189-15 73rd Avenue and 64-05 186th Lane (Credit: Google Maps)

Ruby Schron lands $500M refi for sprawling Queens apartment portfolio

Wendy Silverstein (Credit: Getty Images)

Wendy Silverstein, co-head of WeWork’s real-estate fund, is out

Minneapolis tops the list of best places to recover from divorce (Credit: iStock)

The best (and worst) cities for divorcees

Sidewalk Labs CEO Dan Doctoroff and a rendering of the tower (Credit: Sidewalk Labs/Michael Green Architecture and Gensler)

Alphabet’s wooden skyscraper in Toronto could be tallest in the world

Real estate in states where cannabis use is legal is in high demand compared to states where use is illegal. (Credit: Pixabay)

Cannabis legalization drives demand for warehousing and retail: study

Adam Neumann and some of the properties, Museum Place and 225 West Julian in San Jose 

Adam Neumann no longer has a vision for San Jose

Greystar CEO Bob Faith and the Parkside Place Apartments in Cary, North Carolina (Credit: Greystar and Apartments)

What Greystar’s belief in multifamily says about the health of the economy

arrow_forward_ios
Loading...