Sellers covering monthly charges for buyers

TRD New York /
Mar.March 17, 2009 12:11 PM
Tom Postilio of Core Group Marketing said the sponsors at 246 West 17th Street cut taxes for some buyers

In today’s landscape of Manhattan real estate, it’s all about price. And increasingly, that doesn’t just mean the sale price of an apartment.

More than ever before, potential buyers are focused on condominium common charges and co-op maintenance fees, brokers say, to the point that high monthly costs are now a major deterrent to buyers. In response, sellers — individuals and developers — are offering to pay years of maintenance, common charges or real estate taxes for their buyers.

“People are really looking at that monthly nut carefully, now more than ever,” said Tom Postilio, a managing director at Core Group Marketing.

Jeffrey Tanenbaum, a vice president at Barak Realty, said high monthly
fees are repelling some buyers. “Sometimes the common charges are so
scary that [the listing] is getting no calls,” he said.

added that the younger, first-time buyers, who now make up much of the
market, tend to be more sensitive to monthly fees. “A first-time buyer
is not only looking at price, but maintenance and common charges and
tax,” he said, adding that he has seen sellers offer to pay one, two or
more years of maintenance, common charges or taxes.

In recent years, when jobs were plentiful and hefty bonus checks were virtually guaranteed, buyers seemed happy to pay high monthly fees in exchange for amenities like squash courts, spas and rock climbing walls. That’s no longer the case.

In a post-Lehman Brothers world, buyers “focus on what [their] monthly payment is,” said Louise Phillips Forbes, an executive vice president at Halstead Property. “‘They’re saying, ‘Wow, my maintenance is $4,400 a month? That’s not going down.'”

Some developers are responding to market conditions with maintenance incentives.

Core’s Postilio saw such a strategy work well at 246 West 17th Street, a 17th Street Development NY Corp. development his company is marketing, where the top floors of the building have a 421-a tax abatement, but the lower floors, which were built earlier, do not. As a result, a buyer of 1,208-square-foot one bedroom on the first floor would pay yearly taxes of $1,977, while a slightly smaller one-bedroom on the eighth floor carries taxes of $43, according to

Understandably, the units with the tax abatement sold faster than those without it, Postilio said. “The units that remain are the ones that didn’t have the tax abatement,” he said, prompting the sponsor to reduce the prices of the remaining units by the amount owners of units on the lower floors would pay in taxes during the period of the abatement.

“The sponsors just knocked off what someone would pay in taxes off the asking prices,” Postilio said. “It really increased the traffic.”‘

This kind of arrangement works well because it’s often not a huge amount of money for the seller, but buyers breathe easier knowing that their payments will be lower each month.

“It’s a way of making the buyer feel more comfortable with a higher-maintenance building,” said Paul Purcell, a partner at real estate consultancy Braddock + Purcell and co-founder of the New York City branch of Charles Rutenberg Realty.

Braddock + Purcell recently consulted on a listing for a $995,000 two-bedroom co-op at 151 East 83rd Street where the seller is offering a “maintenance reduction” of $50,000, to be paid in increments of $10,000 over five years, he said. Monthly maintenance on the home is $1,405, according to

Tanenbaum added that today’s price-sensitive buyers prefer low maintenance over amenities like a gym or a swimming pool.

While a fitness center, for example, “is nice to have for the day it rains, it’s not the allure it once was,” he said. “They want to go to Equinox or New York Sports Club. They don’t want to use the in-house gym.”

That’s especially true now that buyers are worried about job security. While outside pet grooming services or spin classes can be canceled if the buyer loses a job, a building’s monthly fees aren’t negotiable. In fact, they’ll likely increase over time.

“They say it’s all about price and maintenance,” Tanenbaum said. “[Buyers] don’t want to live to pay a mortgage.”

This phenomenon sometimes even extends to doormen and elevators. Young buyers in particular, accustomed to the relative safety of post-Giuliani streets, don’t seem to mind giving up those features if it is a better deal when they go from renting to owning, Tanenbaum said.

“Many rentals come fully loaded, but when you’re looking to buy you have to prioritize, and for many people a doorman is not important,” he said. “They are just as happy to walk into their building and go up the stairs.”

Related Articles

Cammeby's International Group founder Rubin Schron and, from top: 194-05 67th Avenue, 189-15 73rd Avenue and 64-05 186th Lane (Credit: Google Maps)

Ruby Schron lands $500M refi for sprawling Queens apartment portfolio

Wendy Silverstein, co-head of WeWork’s real-estate fund, is out

WeWork’s side businesses are fizzling

Bill Rudin and Dock 72

WeWork’s landlords buckle up

Jay Martin, James Whelan and Joe Strasburg

Rent-pocalypse 2.0: Real estate industry reacts to tenant demands

Thor Equities' Joe Sitt and a closeup of 545 Madison Avenue (Credit: Google Maps)

Thor Equities loses 545 Madison Avenue

Daily Digest Thursday

Legislation introduced to protect tenants in ‘keyless’ buildings, Compass pushes back against WeWork comparison: Daily digest

Ben Carson on how Opportunity Zones are unlike red and black ants: TRD Miami Showcase & Forum