Lenders pick favorites when deciding whether to foreclose

New York /
Oct.October 29, 2009 02:18 PM
From left: Whitney Wilcox, Isaac Zion, Howard Nottingham, Jay Koster, Steven Koppel, at last night’s REBNY meeting
 

Lenders mulling which borrowers to chase into foreclosure will be considering not only the viability of the struggling real estate projects but also the relationship with the developers, finance experts said at a panel last night held at the Real Estate Board of New York.

While most lenders do not want to take back distressed properties and are content to extend loan terms, in certain situations they will move against the owners.

In those cases, aggressive efforts to take back properties will at times be made based on the level of business the borrower has with the lender, said panelist Steven Koppel, partner at law firm Jones Day.

“A strong bank may have more of an appetite to force the issue, especially if the borrowing entity is not a client they want in the future or is in an asset class they are not really interested in,” Koppel said.

He was one of five industry professionals on the real estate finance panel moderated by Peter Hennessy, managing director at commercial services firm Jones Lang LaSalle, and held at REBNY’s Midtown office.

Other panelists were Whitney Wilcox, senior managing director at financial firm Holliday Fenoglio Fowler; Isaac Zion, managing director at SL Green Realty; Howard Nottingham, executive managing director at brokerage Studley; and Jay Koster, managing director at brokerage Jones Lang LaSalle.

The panelists said that some of the government’s efforts to restart lending have yielded few results.

Zion said SL Green sought to utilize the federal Term Asset-Backed Securities Loan Facility, or TALF, to finance a project, but dropped the idea because financing was better elsewhere.

“We were looking for some TALF financing for a deal but we got much better execution from some German banks and some Asian banks. And even the U.S. life insurance companies are offering better execution,” he said.

While investors have been slow to use the government program, other federal laws have actually impeded foreign investors, Zion said.

“A recent Internal Revenue Service ruling is killing Singapore,” investment in the United States, he said, taxing them at a very high rate. “That is why you are seeing China and Korea more active. They have a favorable tax treaty.”


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
John Banks
High expectations: A look at John Banks’ 4 years at REBNY
High expectations: A look at John Banks’ 4 years at REBNY
John Banks
John Banks to step down as REBNY president
John Banks to step down as REBNY president
REBNY Awards
Newmark Knight Frank wins REBNY retail award for Alamo Drafthouse deal in FiDi
Newmark Knight Frank wins REBNY retail award for Alamo Drafthouse deal in FiDi
Flight to quality in office real estate leaves trophy buildings the only winners
Flight to quality in office real estate leaves trophy buildings the only winners
Flight to quality in office real estate leaves trophy buildings the only winners
511 Barry Street and CenterPoint Properties CEO Bob Chapman (CBRE, GI Partners)
CenterPoint buys second warehouse in Hunts Point
CenterPoint buys second warehouse in Hunts Point
One Vanderbilt, Stone Ridge CEO Ross Stevens, SL Green CEO Marc Holliday (SLG, YouTube via NYDIG)
Finance firm leases 100K SF at SL Green’s One Vanderbilt
Finance firm leases 100K SF at SL Green’s One Vanderbilt
Mintz, Levin takes 101K SF at SL Green’s 919 Third Avenue
Mintz, Levin takes 101K SF at SL Green’s 919 Third Avenue
Mintz, Levin takes 101K SF at SL Green’s 919 Third Avenue
NYC landlords feel that the city's new energy efficiency grades aren't accurately reflecting what's going on at their buildings. (iStock)
Energy efficiency grades: motivation or nuisance?
Energy efficiency grades: motivation or nuisance?
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...