Attorney Generals clash over proposed mortgage settlement

TRD New York /
Mar.March 15, 2011 01:54 PM

State attorneys general are butting heads over a proposed settlement with loan servicers over their faulty foreclosure practices, according to HousingWire. The proposal is the result of an investigation launched in October into some of the nation’s largest mortgage lenders after a scandal revealed widespread errors in foreclosure documentation. But it appears there’s still quite a bit of negotiating to do. According to a spokesperson for Iowa Attorney General Tom Miller, “we haven’t even begun face-to-face discussions with the banks yet.” Meanwhile, a spokesperson for Utah Attorney General Mark Shurtleff said he hasn’t even seen the settlement, and Scott Pruitt, the attorney general from Oklahoma, has openly declared that he is against the idea of forcing servicers into principal write-downs. Virginia Attorney General Kenneth Cuccinelli has said at least a dozen states, including Virginia, oppose the deal. Each attorney general would have to sign off on the settlement in order for banks to be subject to the new regulations in their individual states.[HousingWire]


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
When banks walk from foreclosures, borrowers don’t always get the memo

When banks walk from foreclosures, borrowers don’t always get the memo

Placeholder image

Fannie Mae’s history of ignoring foreclosure problems predates crisis

Placeholder image

Fannie’s many chances to stop robo-signing went ignored: report

Placeholder image

As Obama homes in on $25B mortgage settlement, Schneiderman holds out for more

Placeholder image

Investigation finds GMAC falsified paperwork to pursue foreclosure

As feds near settlement with banks, foreclosures plummet citywide

As feds near settlement with banks, foreclosures plummet citywide

Placeholder image

Distressed U.S. home sales surge in December

Placeholder image

Lenders in New Jersey ordered to prove foreclosure practices are up to snuff

arrow_forward_ios