Lend Lease case latest blow to construction industry

TRD New York /
Apr.April 27, 2012 01:30 PM

The federal investigation into Lend Lease Construction is likely to extend far into the New York construction industry and is just one example of what some experts consider a widespread practice of fraudulent billing. The firm, formerly known as Bovis Lend Lease, agreed to pay $56 million to settle charges of over-billing clients at projects ranging from the construction of Citi Field, the home of the New York Mets, to the renovation of Grand Central Terminal more than a decade ago, in an investigation led by Brooklyn-based U.S. Attorney Loretta Lynch.

James Abadie, principal of Lend Lease’s New York office, pleaded guilty to fraud Tuesday, and the company is expected to cooperate under a plea agreement that could extend the investigation for another two years.

Experts say the allegations against Lend Lease are not isolated to one firm, but indicate a widely employed pattern of undercutting the competition to get a job, then padding the books to boost revenues on the back of a sometimes unsuspecting client — yet often with the client’s knowledge or complicit approval.

“This is every day practice,” said Mike Kessler, president of Kessler International, a Manhattan-based corporate investigation firm that examines construction practices across the country. “We do a lot of construction audits and we’re constantly finding they’re charging for employees that are not on the job.”

Barry LePatner, a Manhattan-based attorney at LePatner & Associates, who specializes in construction issues, said that contractors often submit below cost bids for projects in a competitive bidding process, and then drag out a project by using incomplete site drawings or numerous change orders to bring in extra money.

“They bid at or below cost to secure the job and therefore would never make a profit [and then have] the compelling need to drive up the costs through these unwarranted methods,” LePatner said.

Lend Lease submitted falsified invoices to its clients, which contained charges for labor when contractors were often on vacation or out sick and also billed for overtime when the workers never actually performed work, according to court documents.

Lend Lease also allegedly filed fraudulent documents showing minority subcontractors were working on the Bronx Criminal Courthouse renovation project in 2000, when Lend Lease employees were actually doing the work. As part of the plea agreement, Lend Lease had fired numerous employees, agreed to reform its billing practices, hire legitimate minority contractors as well as maintain a full-time auditor and compliance committee.

“Lend Lease takes corporate responsibility very seriously and is committed to the highest level of ethical standards,” said Robert McNamara, CEO of the Lend Lease Americas region, in a statement. “We accept responsibility for what happened in the past and have continued to make restitution to the affected clients.”

Lend Lease in 2011 agreed to pay $5 million to New York City to settle related charges to the investigation.

The agreement follows a $20 million settlement in March 2011 with U.S. Attorney Preet Bharara in Manhattan to settle fraud charges against Skanska USA, related to the construction of the $1.4 billion Fulton Street Transit Center. In May 2011, four executives at Lehr Construction were indicted by District Attorney Cyrus Vance for allegedly stealing $30 million from clients by inflating subcontractors’ costs on office buildings across Manhattan.

“There are indications that this is a broader problem than certainly this one instance,” said one official who asked not to be identified.

Legal experts say that real estate owners and developers are often willing to settle construction fraud cases out of court rather than force the issue out into the public, because they are embarrassed that a construction firm submitted invoices for no-show work or inflated building materials.

“The ownership doesn’t want to [admit] it because it makes them look stupid,” said a prominent real estate attorney, who asked for anonymity. “We haven’t gotten a call yet, but I’m sure we will because people will say ‘I think I’ve been charged much too much on this project.'”


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Navillus president Donal O’Sullivan (Image via Navillus)

Navillus CEO, sister arrested in $1M scheme to cheat unions

Navillus CEO, sister arrested in $1M scheme to cheat unions
731 Lexington Avenue (Google Maps)

Former Turner Construction exec pleads guilty in bribery scheme

Former Turner Construction exec pleads guilty in bribery scheme
Javits Center (Google Maps)

Javits worker: I reported discrimination — and was fired

Javits worker: I reported discrimination — and was fired
Savraj Gata-Aura

Bar Works Ponzi schemer sentenced to prison

Bar Works Ponzi schemer sentenced to prison
Social Construct CEO Ben Huh, The Real Deal's Hiten Samtani and Social Construct cofounder Michael Yarne

How code could make multifamily construction more predictable

How code could make multifamily construction more predictable
Social Construct CEO Ben Huh, The Real Deal's Hiten Samtani and Social Construct cofounder Michael Yarne

The REInterview: Social Construct’s founders on making multifamily construction an assembly line

The REInterview: Social Construct’s founders on making multifamily construction an assembly line
60 Riverside Boulevard and (inset) the island of Nauru (Google Maps)

UWS condo caught up in bribery scandal tied to world’s smallest republic

UWS condo caught up in bribery scandal tied to world’s smallest republic
136 East 36 Street and 211 East 34th Street (CitizenApp)

Midtown scaffolding collapse kills one, hours after building crumbles nearby

Midtown scaffolding collapse kills one, hours after building crumbles nearby
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...