Without Landmarks commission, Penn Station protestors were powerless

New York /
Aug.August 01, 2012 04:00 PM

Fifty years ago tomorrow, when Penn Station was heralded as an architectural masterpiece, a group of protestors who went by Agbany, or the Action Group for Better Architecture in New York, gathered outside the station’s entrance to protest plans for the new station, which New Yorkers use to this day. Both developer Irving Mitchell Felt and the Pennsylvania Railroad razed the structure the following year to replace it with Madison Square Garden, a hotel and an office tower.

The protest clearly proved to be unsuccessful, but one of the demonstrators, architect Diana Goldstein, told the New York Times “We knew we wouldn’t win, but we did hope to change the climate.”

Only when the demolition reached completion, the Times said, did the Landmarks Preservation Commission gain regulatory power. Many believe that the Penn Station episode helped save the Grand Central Terminal and other city landmarks from destruction.

But today, many developers believe the landmarking process has swung too far in favor of preservation. As previously reported, current LPC Chairman Robert Tierney has designated more city historic districts than any other administration.

Developers have indicated these designations bring them more expenses, which get passed on to city residents. The City Council met for a hearing earlier this year to discuss a bill requiring the LPC to weigh potential lost costs from new developments before landmarking them. A separate bill would require City Council approval for designations. [NYT] — Zachary Kussin


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
The Strand Bookstore and store owner Nancy Bass Wyden (Credit: Getty Images)
Over owner’s protests, city landmarks Strand bookstore
Over owner’s protests, city landmarks Strand bookstore
Revamped design for 550 Madison receives Landmarks’ approval
Revamped design for 550 Madison receives Landmarks’ approval
Revamped design for 550 Madison receives Landmarks’ approval
The Top 10 preservation fights of 2018
The Top 10 preservation fights of 2018
The Top 10 preservation fights of 2018
The Howard Hughes Corporation CEO David O'Reilly (LinkedIn via David O'Reilly)
Howard Hughes’ (slightly less) big Seaport project approved
Howard Hughes’ (slightly less) big Seaport project approved
Photo illustration of Vornado CEO Steven Roth and Hotel Pennsylvania at 401 Seventh Avenue (Getty, iStock, Vornado)
“Inevitable”: Vornado will demolish Hotel Pennsylvania
“Inevitable”: Vornado will demolish Hotel Pennsylvania
A rendering of 250 Water Street, Landmarks Preservation Commission chair Sarah Carroll and Howard Hughes Corporation CEO David O’Reilly (Center for Architecture, The Howard Hughes Corporation/SOM)
Howard Hughes told to further refine Seaport tower proposal
Howard Hughes told to further refine Seaport tower proposal
Gov. Andrew Cuomo (Getty, iStock)
Cuomo’s $1.3B for Penn Station work can’t go to towers
Cuomo’s $1.3B for Penn Station work can’t go to towers
Howard Hughes Corporation CEO David O’Reilly and 250 Water Street (The Howard Hughes Corporation/SOM)
Critics look down on shorter 250 Water Street
Critics look down on shorter 250 Water Street
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...