U.S. Supreme Court ruling on property rights a major win for real estate developers

Florida owner claimed denial of land use permit was unconstitutional

TRD New York /
Jun.June 25, 2013 06:30 PM

The U.S. Supreme Court today ruled in favor of a Florida landowner in a case that could have widespread ramifications for property developers challenging state and municipal land use policies, Atlantic Cities reported.

The 11-year-old case was filed by Coy Koontz, the now-deceased, longtime owner of a 15-acre wetlands plot outside Orlando.

In the 1990s, Koontz applied for a permit from the local water management district to develop a building, parking lot and retention pond on almost four acres of the property. Koontz’s son, also named Coy, is now the property owner.

Under Florida law, developers seeking to build on wetlands must get a special permit, and the agencies that issue them can require landowners to offset environmental impacts. Though Koontz floated a plan to conserve the remaining acres, the district wanted him to go further and develop only a single acre or pay workers to improve nearby public wetlands instead.

Instead, Koontz sued, claiming the rejection of the permit amounted to a violation of a Fifth Amendment clause banning the government from taking private property without proper compensation.

The 5-4 majority in Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Management District sided with the developer, seemingly expanding the definition of the so-called Takings Clause.

“It makes no difference that no property was actually taken in this case,” Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the majority, said in the decision. “Extortionate demands for property in the land-use permitting context run afoul of the Takings Clause not because they take property but because they impermissibly burden the right not to have property taken without just compensation.” [Atlantic Cities]Zachary Kussin


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
This way to the beach: Supreme Court won’t hear billionaire’s appeal to close California beach path

This way to the beach: Supreme Court won’t hear billionaire’s appeal to close California beach path

From back: 2010 Mavericks Competition; Vinod Khosla (Credit: Shalom Jacobovitz; TechCrunch CC by 2.0)

The battle over Cali beaches: billionaire homeowner vs. surfers

Facing extinction, New York’s smut shops are appealing to the Supreme Court

Facing extinction, New York’s smut shops are appealing to the Supreme Court

Supreme Court ruling puts NYC affordable housing plan in peril

Supreme Court ruling puts NYC affordable housing plan in peril

Co-op president dodges suit over Kips Bay apartment

Co-op president dodges suit over Kips Bay apartment

From left: Governor Andrew Cuomo and Ellen with a crowd of protesters

Landlords file suit over new tenant protection agency

U.S. Supreme Court won’t hear Goldman Sachs mortgage case appeal

U.S. Supreme Court won’t hear Goldman Sachs mortgage case appeal

Placeholder image

Real estate transaction fees get a high court reprieve

arrow_forward_ios