Investors are behind 73% of Bed-Stuy’s cheaper home sales

TRD New York /
Oct.October 01, 2013 06:59 PM

It’s tough out there for a Brooklyn buyer looking to land a modestly priced townhouse. But in the gentrifying area of Bedford-Stuyvesant, private buyers face even stiffer competition than elsewhere in the market for homes and small multi-family properties. Over the past year, investors have snapped up nearly three-quarters of the one-, two- and three-family houses sold at the low-end of the market in the neighborhood.

Investment firms were behind 264 of the 361 such sales — or 73 percent – closed over the past 12 months, according to a review by The Real Deal of PropertyShark data of home sales between $100,000 and $550,000, not including apartments.

Investors can beat out typical homebuyers because they can identify opportunities through longstanding relationships and intimate knowledge of the market, and can close quickly because they often buy without financing. Some of the investor buyers include the Forest Hills-based IA Investors and the Rockville Center, L.I.-based Nachmad Holdings. They could not be reached for comment.

IA Investors paid $242,500 for 559 Decatur Street, a two-family house, in October 2012, and Nachmad Holdings purchased 742 Madison Street, a two-family house, for $220,000 in May, the records show.

“The investors have more resources — being in the know, and paying all cash,” said Stephanie O’Brien, an associate broker with Douglas Elliman, and a member of the Peters-O’Brien Team, which concentrates on Brooklyn and Manhattan. “Anything within 20 minutes of Manhattan is a gold mine.”

After buying the properties, the investors either sell them or rent them out, insiders said.

Over the summer, investment funds such as the Australian US Masters Residential Property Fund were targeting Bedford-Stuyvesant homes, as the Brooklyn blog Brownstoner reported.

Some investors reject brokers when they buy properties because they can pay money under the table to save on taxes, said one broker who did not want to be identified being critical of property investors (who often become clients when they want to sell the buildings).

The buyer records a public sale price with the city, but then pays additional money in cash to the seller. Such a transaction would save the seller transfer taxes.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Brokerage firms are strategizing ways to make up losses after the cost of application fees was capped at $20. (Credit: iStock)

Brokerages on rental application fee cap: “It hurts”

Alex Rodriguez (Photos by Guerin Blask)

A-Rod is coming for NYC and SoFla real estate

Nicolai Ouroussoff and Cecily Brown with 125 East 10th Street (Credit: Columbia GSAPP via Flickr, Wikipedia, and StreetEasy)

No criticism here: Nicolai Ouroussoff, Cecily Brown buy E. Village house for $7.75M

There will be 70 agents based at the new office (Credit: iStock)

Compass opens Long Island City office as new-development sales surge

The Daily Digest - Tuesday

New life for Toys “R” Us, Masa Son is “embarrassed” with the Vision Fund: Daily digest

Nooklyn CEO Harley Courts (Credit: iStock)

Brokerage slashes agent commissions, delays payments after rent law change

The Daily Digest - Tuesday

NYC apartment prices hit 4-year low, Pacific Park developers reveal new plans: Daily digest

LeBron wanted it and California’s governor signed it. What the college athlete compensation law means to real estate

arrow_forward_ios