Air rights transfers should undergo public review: OPINION

"One57 is Exhibit A in what we should be able to prevent."

TRD New York /
Dec.December 23, 2013 11:31 AM

City agencies and community groups should have a greater say in air rights transfers, and the city should place a cap on the amount of air rights that can be bought without a public review, according to the architecture critic for the New York Times.

“Developers will raise hell, but the move would not stop sky-high buildings from going up,” critic Michael Kimmelman wrote in an opinion piece published in the newspaper. “Buildings striving for such height would just need to make a case for themselves aesthetically and otherwise.”

Currently, air rights acquisitions that are carried out through a zoning lot merger are not subject to public scrutiny. Kimmelman singled out Extell Development’s One57 as “Exhibit A in what we should be able to prevent.”

Kimmelman also calls for a requirement that developers “give something back” in exchange for permission to buy these air rights, such as affordable housing and contributions to transit improvements. The changes would help preserve the New York skyline and ensure that New Yorkers benefit from these projects, he added. [NYT]  – Hiten Samtani

Related Articles

206 West 17th Street, 116 7th Avenue, and Extell Development’s Gary Barnett (Credit: Google Maps)

What rich people in NYC will pay to keep their view: TRD analysis

Mayor Bill de Blasio and the Ingersoll Houses at 120 Navy Walk in Brooklyn (Credit: Google Maps and Getty Images)

These are the developers looking to buy air rights from NYCHA

A sponsor unit at One57 lists for $58.5M

A sponsor unit at Extell’s One57 just sold at a 24% discount

Rockrose paves the way for Hudson Yards rental tower with $20M air rights deal

City to revoke permits for Extell’s Kazakh-backed tower at 50 West 66th Street

New York’s most expensive* rental is a One57 unit asking $125K per month

Yet another One57 seller takes a loss