Extell faces contempt charge in escrow dispute with banker

JP Morgan exec says developer failed to return $440K after UWS condo purchase fell through

TRD New York /
Jul.July 30, 2014 04:15 PM

Lawyers for Extell Development are scheduled to appear in court next month on a possible civil contempt charge amid claims that the developer is refusing to hand over $440,000 to a bank executive in a long-running dispute at the Rushmore condominium on the Upper West Side.

Lawyers for Kelly Coffey, deputy CEO (U.S. Private Bank) at JP Morgan, allege that Extell has refused to return more than $440,000 in interest and other expenses after the firm lost an escrow case where Coffey backed out of a $6.9 million apartment purchase at the Rushmore, located at 80 Riverside Boulevard.

Attorney Marc Held, who represents Coffey, says that lawyers for Extell as well as the escrow agent, Stroock, Stroock and Lavan, have defied repeated court orders to release the money. He also claims that the lawyers for Extell have given direct instructions to the bond company not to release the funds.

“Despite the plaintiff’s unanimous victory in the Appellate Division, with costs, the defendants continue to disregard the order of the court and release the bond to the plaintiff in payment of the judgment,” Held said in a statement. “As such, it has necessitated the plaintiff to file a motion to The Supreme Court ordering the defendants to be held in contempt and accountable for their blatant disregard of the court’s directives.”

According to court documents filed July 25 in Manhattan Supreme Court, lawyers for Extell, as well as Stroock, Stroock & Lavan and U.S. Specialty Insurance Co. have been ordered to appear for questioning at the Aug. 25 hearing.

Jason Cyrulnik, a Boies Schiller partner who represents Extell in the case, denied the allegations, noting that the funds are being held pending the end of any legal challenges.

“There is some money being held by a court approved bond company,” he said. “There‘s no issue apart from procedures being followed.”

Bruce Schneider, a partner at Stroock, Stroock & Lavan, also denied the allegations, saying his firm was just the escrow agent.

The counsel for U.S. Specialty Insurance declined to comment, as did a spokesperson for Extell.

According to court filings, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Debra James ordered a refund of Coffey’s $1 million down payment, plus interest, in April 2013. By May of This Year An Appellate Court panel unanimously affirmed that order, which means there would be no additional legal remedies.

The $440,000 is based on a penalty of 9 percent interest dating back to September 2008, the original closing date for condo purchasers at the Rushmore, according to court documents. Extell, which is headed by Gary Barnett, lost a similar case against 33 prospective condo buyers, who demanded more than $16 million in refunds of their down payments after Extell failed to begin closing sales with these buyers by the September deadline.

Related Article

One Manhattan Square Extell Development CEO Gary Barnett (Credit: Curbed NY)

Extell lands $690M refinancing package for One Manhattan Square

206 West 17th Street, 116 7th Avenue, and Extell Development’s Gary Barnett (Credit: Google Maps)

What rich people in NYC will pay to keep their view: TRD analysis

Extell Development's Gary Barnett (Credit: Getty Images and iStock)

Chelsea residents paid Gary Barnett $11M to protect their views from a planned tower

José Cuervo owner Juan Beckmann Vidal and 1010 Park Avenue (Credit: Getty Images, StreetEasy)

Mexican billionaire buys Park Ave pad for $25M amid shopping spree

From left: 241 East 73rd Street, 1514-1528 First Avenue, and Extell Development's Gary Barnett (Credit: Google Maps)

Here’s what the $10M–$20M NYC investment sales market looked like last week

Central Park Tower

Extell just went public with Central Park Tower listings

Such investments have become a critical source of financing for New York real estate projects in recent years. (Credit: iStock)

Preferred equity plays are on the rise, but what’s the catch?

Neighbors sue to block Extell’s UWS tower after city OKs amended plans