The Real Deal New York

DOB might nix renovation permits for Samy Mahfar building

Tenant coalition claims living conditions are deplorable at LES building undergoing conversion
January 05, 2015 12:47PM

A coalition of tenants has stepped up its battle with controversial developer Samy Mahfar — and has reportedly convinced the Department of Buildings to audit two work permits currently in place at one of his properties.

Residents hosted a press conference last week, complaining about alleged deplorable conditions at 102 Norfolk Street as well as another Mahfar building on the Lower East Side, 210 Rivington Street, according to Bowery Boogie. Both buildings are undergoing luxury conversions.

One permit application for 102 Norfolk — to repair existing hallways — was allegedly “fraudulently completed,” the website reported. The DOB is also investigating another permit for the building, this one to renovate eleven apartments. A tenant protection plan was purportedly not included in the application. Such a plan is intended to shield residents from asbestos and lead abatement.

In 2013, Mahfar faced a lawsuit from his tenants, alleging that he was trying to force residents out by having them live in bad conditions.

The DOB issued Mahfar an “intent to revoke” notice. If the problems persist past two weeks, the developer will have to halt the renovations on the building. [Bowery Boogie] — Claire Moses


  • JEng

    Can pro tenant advocates affect property tax assessments on a building they have targeted? Because we are the highest regardless of certiorari on our block. And even when a RPIE was filed, they still hiked us and didnt reassess so if you don’t pay one of these firms or whatever ….

    – political representatives elsewhere DO represent constituents and look into inflated taxes without worrying about pissing off government because revenue is affected. I really wish we had a Tony Avella in Manhattan but we don’t. It’s not unbiased.

  • SMA Response

    The DOB has reviewed construction documents for 102 Norfolk and deemed that the approval and permit should not be revoked.