Council bill would create deadlines in landmarking process

Some properties have sat in limbo since the 1960s

New York /
Apr.April 29, 2015 11:50 AM

A City Council bill is aiming to rein in the Landmarks Preservation Commission’s scheduling, which has no definite rules on deadlines and can sometimes allow properties to linger in limbo for decades.

The bill, introduced Tuesday by City Council members Peter Koo and David Greenfield, would force the Landmarks Preservation Commission to wrap up proceedings on roughly 100 historic buildings that are currently stuck in the process, some since as far back as the 1960s, and would also establish deadlines for the future, Crain’s reported.

“This basically would clear the backlog, but more importantly, it would allow some predictability going forward,” Greenfield said.

The proposed deadlines would dictate that the commission hold a hearing on a proposed structure or property within 180 days of receiving a request for consideration and vote within the next 180 days. If an entire district is in question, the commission would have two years. If no action is taken, the property or district would not be eligible for resubmission for five years.

The Land Use Committee plans to hold a hearing on the bill in the next few months.

Earlier this month, Manhattan Borough President Gale Brewer announced she would introduce a landmarks application reform bill, but withdrew the announcement several days later. [Crain’s] — Tess Hofmann

 

Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
The Strand Bookstore and store owner Nancy Bass Wyden (Credit: Getty Images)
Over owner’s protests, city landmarks Strand bookstore
Over owner’s protests, city landmarks Strand bookstore
Revamped design for 550 Madison receives Landmarks’ approval
Revamped design for 550 Madison receives Landmarks’ approval
Revamped design for 550 Madison receives Landmarks’ approval
The Top 10 preservation fights of 2018
The Top 10 preservation fights of 2018
The Top 10 preservation fights of 2018
The complaint against the tower includes loss of views for current residents in the neighborhood. (Getty)
Seaport community groups sue to block Howard Hughes’ Water Street tower
Seaport community groups sue to block Howard Hughes’ Water Street tower
The Howard Hughes Corporation CEO David O'Reilly (LinkedIn via David O'Reilly)
Howard Hughes’ (slightly less) big Seaport project approved
Howard Hughes’ (slightly less) big Seaport project approved
A rendering of 250 Water Street, Landmarks Preservation Commission chair Sarah Carroll and Howard Hughes Corporation CEO David O’Reilly (Center for Architecture, The Howard Hughes Corporation/SOM)
Howard Hughes told to further refine Seaport tower proposal
Howard Hughes told to further refine Seaport tower proposal
Howard Hughes Corporation CEO David O’Reilly and 250 Water Street (The Howard Hughes Corporation/SOM)
Critics look down on shorter 250 Water Street
Critics look down on shorter 250 Water Street
Previous rendering of 250 Water Street (left) and a new rendering (right) with Howard Hughes Corporation CEO David O’Reilly (The Howard Hughes Corporation/SOM)
Howard Hughes hopes smaller Seaport project will work this time
Howard Hughes hopes smaller Seaport project will work this time
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...