Supreme Court ruling puts NYC affordable housing plan in peril

Ruling could leave the city policy open to discrimination suits

TRD New York /
Jul.July 14, 2015 05:45 PM

A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling that reinterprets the Fair Housing Act could threaten New York City’s longtime practice of building new affordable housing units in low-income and minority neighborhoods.

The high court’s June 25 decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, would require anyone challenging an affordable housing policy as a violation of the Fair Housing Act to prove only that the policy itself is discriminatory, rather than prove it intentionally violated the rights of the people covered under the act.

The ruling could present a major obstacle to Mayor Bill de Blasio’s drive to construct 80,000 new affordable housing units within the next decade, according to experts in housing law, Crain’s reported.

The [de Blasio] administration is definitely going to have to think through the implications of all its housing policies,” Kenneth Fisher, a former City Council member and land-use attorney at Cozen O’Connor, told Crain’s. “They will need to be able to explain to the Department of Justice and [the Department of Housing and Urban Development] why their policies are furthering integration—and not segregation.”

New York City for a long time has concentrated housing subsidies on affordable housing construction in lower-income neighborhoods with large populations of minority residents. Land costs in those areas are substantially lower than in more affluent locales such as Manhattan or Brooklyn, so the subsidies help pay for more housing units.

But the high court’s ruling makes this policy vulnerable to legal challenges under the premise that focusing subsidies on lower-income areas increases economic and racial segregation, even if this is not the policy’s intent. — TRD


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
The Sand Castle apartment complex at 7-11 Seagirt Ave in Far Rockaway (Credit: Google Maps)

Queens landlords settle record $1M discrimination case

This way to the beach: Supreme Court won’t hear billionaire’s appeal to close California beach path

This way to the beach: Supreme Court won’t hear billionaire’s appeal to close California beach path

Landlords are discriminating against porn stars. Is it legal?

Landlords are discriminating against porn stars. Is it legal?

New York City is still segregated 50 years after Fair Housing Act

New York City is still segregated 50 years after Fair Housing Act

From back: 2010 Mavericks Competition; Vinod Khosla (Credit: Shalom Jacobovitz; TechCrunch CC by 2.0)

The battle over Cali beaches: billionaire homeowner vs. surfers

Facing extinction, New York’s smut shops are appealing to the Supreme Court

Facing extinction, New York’s smut shops are appealing to the Supreme Court

Parkoff Organization is discriminating against black renters: suit

Parkoff Organization is discriminating against black renters: suit

Supreme Court ruling paves way for cities to sue over predatory lending

Supreme Court ruling paves way for cities to sue over predatory lending

arrow_forward_ios