Stuy Town investors continue legal battle

Bondholders ask Minnesota judge to interpret agreements

New York /
Dec.December 28, 2015 05:30 PM

The city’s largest single-asset real estate transaction in nearly a decade may be a done deal, but behind the scenes the battle wages on for some $500 million in proceeds from the sale of Stuyvesant Town – Peter Cooper Village.

At the request of New Jersey-based hedge fund Appaloosa Management, a major investor in the $3 billion senior loan on Stuy Town, fund trustee U.S. Bank National Associates filed a petition in Minnesota state court asking a judge to weigh in on how the sale proceeds should be distributed.

U.S. Bank filed the petition earlier this month in its home state, after a New York supreme court judge denied Appaloosa’s request for a preliminary injunction blocking CWCapital, the special servicer on the Stuy Town loan, from cashing in on disputed funds left over from the sale.

The Appaloosa-managed funds were investors in the commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) bonds that Tishman Speyer and BlackRock used to finance its $5.4 billion acquisition of Stuy Town in 2006.

When Tishman defaulted on its loans four years later and handed over the keys to the complex, CWCapital took control on behalf of the bondholders.

The Blackstone Group and Ivanhoe Cambridge closed on the $5.3 billion purchase of the complex earlier this month. CWCapital believes that the service agreements on the loan entitled it to collect up to $566 million in additional charges, because the purchase price was far greater than the $3 billion mortgage.

U.S. Bank isn’t taking a side in the dispute. Rather, it said it is responding to a request from Appaloosa that it take “all action necessary” to enforce the service agreement on the loan, and is asking the court to decide how the proceeds from the sale should be divided.

“The Trustee is faced with competing interpretations regarding whether the disputed funds include penalty interest that the special servicer is entitled to receive as additional servicing compensation and, if so, the proper amount of the disputed funds that constitute penalty interest,” U.S. Bank’s lawyers wrote.

The court set a hearing date for Feb. 8.


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Blackstone CEO Steven Schwartzman and Stuyvesant Town (Credit: Getty Images)
After authorities vowed review of Stuy Town deal, Blackstone changes course on vacancies
After authorities vowed review of Stuy Town deal, Blackstone changes course on vacancies
The Closing: Janice Mac Avoy
The Closing: Janice Mac Avoy
The Closing: Janice Mac Avoy
421-427 East 14th Street (Google Maps, iStock)
Stuy Town to get new 17K sf grocery store
Stuy Town to get new 17K sf grocery store
Stuyvesant Town (Getty)
Layoffs at Blackstone’s Stuy Town management firm
Layoffs at Blackstone’s Stuy Town management firm
From left: Tishman Speyer CEO Rob Speyer, Fiorello LaGuardia and Robert Moses. Inset: Hiten Samtani and Charles Bagli (Getty Images, Wikipedia Commons)
Tuna fish sandwiches and billion-dollar deals: Charles Bagli on other people’s money and the next life of New York
Tuna fish sandwiches and billion-dollar deals: Charles Bagli on other people’s money and the next life of New York
Blackstone's Jonathan Gray and an aerial of Stuyvesant Town (Credit: (Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images; iStock)
Stuy Town tenants sue Blackstone to stop rent hikes
Stuy Town tenants sue Blackstone to stop rent hikes
Linda Rosenthal and Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village  (Credit: Brett Carlsen/Getty Images; Orjan F. Ellingvag/Corbis via Getty Images)
Pol seeks to punish landlords with “warehousing fee” for vacancies
Pol seeks to punish landlords with “warehousing fee” for vacancies
From left: Jonathan Gray and Steve Schwarzman with Stuyvesant Town
Behind Blackstone’s “capital strike”
Behind Blackstone’s “capital strike”
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...