search

The Real Deal Logo

Trending

Tides Equities faces three foreclosures in Fort WorthTides Equities faces three foreclosures in Fort WorthHow Hochul played the “good cause eviction” game, and wonHow Hochul played the “good cause eviction” game, and wonLawmakers reach sweeping housing deal with “good cause eviction,” new 421aLawmakers reach sweeping housing deal with “good cause eviction,” new 421aDevelopers have a new tax break. Now they must figure it outDevelopers have a new tax break. Now they must figure it out
New York

You’re on the clock: Land use committee OKs deadlines for Landmarks

Council members say bill will bring transparency and efficiency to process

<em>From left: David Greenfield, Ben Kallos and the Pepsi-Cola sign in Long Island City</em>
From left: David Greenfield, Ben Kallos and the Pepsi-Cola sign in Long Island City

The City Council’s land use committee on Tuesday approved a bill that would set a deadline for designating historic properties and districts as city landmarks.

The bill would require the Landmarks Preservation Commission to designate an individual property within one year of putting the property on its calendar, New York YIMBY reported. For historic districts, Landmarks would have two years to hold a public hearing and vote. The commission can approve a one-year extension for individual properties but can’t extend the deadline for historic districts. An earlier version of the bill also included a five-year moratorium on reconsidering properties that missed the deadline, but that measure was eliminated from the latest version of the legislation.

Sign Up for the undefined Newsletter

Currently, Landmarks doesn’t have deadlines, which may explain why some properties have languished on the commission’s calendar for decades. Earlier this year, Landmarks began plowing through a backlog of nearly 100 properties that dated back to the 1960s.

Some Council members touted the bill as a way to bring efficiency and transparency to the landmarking process. Council member David Greenfield said the measure will give Landmarks “plenty of time” to consider a landmark. Others, including Councilman Ben Kallos, voted against the bill, citing that the legislation should have included an extension option for historic districts.

“Raise your hands – has anyone ever needed an extension an exam, a paper, your taxes?” he said. “I think having extensions would be helpful.” [NY YIMBY] — Kathryn Brenzel

Tags
Landmarks Preservation Commission