Riverside tests out controversial MIH track for Bed-Stuy project

New York /
Apr.April 06, 2017 11:50 AM

Riverside Developers is planning a Mandatory Inclusionary Housing project in Bedford-Stuyvesant where most of the residents will earn more than the area median income.

The developer is seeking to rezone sites at Flushing and Franklin avenues as part of the MIH “workforce option,” Politico reported. This track was designed to benefit middle-class tenants by setting the affordable requirement at an average of 115 percent of the area median income ($89,355 for a household of three). Riverside will set aside 30 percent of its 296 units for these tenants, while the rest will be market-rate. The City Planning Commission approved the project — two building at 376-378 Flushing Avenue and 43 Franklin Avenue — in March.

This will be the first test of the MIH’s workforce option and highlights the debate over what is meant by “affordable.”

“I believe that people who have higher (incomes) also need assistance, but if they need assistance, we certainly know that people of lower (incomes) also need assistance, and this doesn’t include any of them,” Council member Jumaane Williams, who voted against MIH, said during a recent Council hearing.

Riverside won’t receive any city subsidies for the project. Council member Steve Levin, who represents the area and whose support is crucial for the rezoning to go through, noted that he voted in favor of MIH with the workforce option in mind.

“In going for a project that is not relying on subsidy, I think what’s being put forward is creating some traditionally middle-income (housing),” Levin said. “I don’t think that the project in and of itself would be then the cure-all for affordable housing needs in the neighborhood, and there’s going to continue to be a need for more lower-income housing.”

Two Democratic state senators recently proposed a bill that would change how affordability in housing projects is calculated. AMI is based on how the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s calculations, using a formula that lumps the five boroughs together with Putnam, Westchester and Rockland counties.[Politico] — Kathryn Brenzel


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Rendering of 300 Huntington Street (Monadnock Development, iStock)
No parking? No problem for Monadnock project in Gowanus
No parking? No problem for Monadnock project in Gowanus
(iStock/Illustration by Kevin Rebong for The Real Deal)
These are real estate executives’ worst worries for 2021
These are real estate executives’ worst worries for 2021
Meredith Marshall (Photo by Emily Assiran)
“We need more housing”: Q&A with BRP Companies’ Meredith Marshall
“We need more housing”: Q&A with BRP Companies’ Meredith Marshall
(iStock/Photo Illustration by Kevin Rebong for The Real Deal)
Dubious gentrification study will backfire on New York City
Dubious gentrification study will backfire on New York City
Ryan Serhant and Gary Barnett on Development Slowdown in Pandemic
Coffee Talk: Extell’s Gary Barnett and Ryan Serhant
Coffee Talk: Extell’s Gary Barnett and Ryan Serhant
227 Grand Street in Williamsburg, and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (far left)
“I suppose a lot of people have a full stomach from what he did:” Inside Yoel Goldman’s very bad year
“I suppose a lot of people have a full stomach from what he did:” Inside Yoel Goldman’s very bad year
The newest plan for the New York Wheel is 210 feet shorter than the 2018 plans. (Cosentini Associates, Getty)
Honey, I shrunk the Wheel: Smaller ride planned for Staten Island
Honey, I shrunk the Wheel: Smaller ride planned for Staten Island
Modell's at 360 Fulton Street, Brooklyn (Google Maps)
Former Modell’s site in Downtown Brooklyn up for sale
Former Modell’s site in Downtown Brooklyn up for sale
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...