Riverside tests out controversial MIH track for Bed-Stuy project

TRD NEW YORK /
Apr.April 06, 2017 11:50 AM
Rose Castle

378 Flushing Avenue in Bedford-Stuyvesant

Riverside Developers is planning a Mandatory Inclusionary Housing project in Bedford-Stuyvesant where most of the residents will earn more than the area median income.

The developer is seeking to rezone sites at Flushing and Franklin avenues as part of the MIH “workforce option,” Politico reported. This track was designed to benefit middle-class tenants by setting the affordable requirement at an average of 115 percent of the area median income ($89,355 for a household of three). Riverside will set aside 30 percent of its 296 units for these tenants, while the rest will be market-rate. The City Planning Commission approved the project — two building at 376-378 Flushing Avenue and 43 Franklin Avenue — in March.

This will be the first test of the MIH’s workforce option and highlights the debate over what is meant by “affordable.”

“I believe that people who have higher (incomes) also need assistance, but if they need assistance, we certainly know that people of lower (incomes) also need assistance, and this doesn’t include any of them,” Council member Jumaane Williams, who voted against MIH, said during a recent Council hearing.

Riverside won’t receive any city subsidies for the project. Council member Steve Levin, who represents the area and whose support is crucial for the rezoning to go through, noted that he voted in favor of MIH with the workforce option in mind.

“In going for a project that is not relying on subsidy, I think what’s being put forward is creating some traditionally middle-income (housing),” Levin said. “I don’t think that the project in and of itself would be then the cure-all for affordable housing needs in the neighborhood, and there’s going to continue to be a need for more lower-income housing.”

Two Democratic state senators recently proposed a bill that would change how affordability in housing projects is calculated. AMI is based on how the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s calculations, using a formula that lumps the five boroughs together with Putnam, Westchester and Rockland counties.[Politico] — Kathryn Brenzel


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
US Steel’s sprawling South Works site is about the size of Downtown Chicago. At left, Common, who wants to partner with developers on a mixed-use entertainment district there, and Dan McCaffery, whose vision for a 13,000-home community fizzled out. (Credit: Common by Paras Griffin/Getty Images; McCaffery via McCaffery Interests; aerial by Cushman & Wakefield)

South Works, the 415-acre “magnificent property,” is Chicago’s biggest development opportunity

Miki Naftali, Steven Witkoff and Ryan Freedman

TRD Talks: How developers are contending with coronavirus

Mayor Bill de Blasio halted ULURP, stalling projects like 960 Franklin Avenue, Rikers Island and Industry City 

These projects could be held up by New York’s rezoning freeze

Morris Moinian and 1150 6th Avenue (Credit: Noam Galai/Getty Images, Google Maps)

Morris Moinian to sell site of stalled hotel project

An aerial of Flushing's waterfront and New York City Council member Peter Koo (Credit: Google Maps)

Massive Flushing waterfront development stirs opposition

133-25 37th Avenue in Flushing

Developer Gary Tsan buys Flushing property for $60M

South Carolina town puts moratorium on development (Credit: iStock)

The high cost of low taxes: South Carolina town bans all development for 16 months

U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Sunnyside Yards (inset) (Credit: Getty Images and Wikipedia)

AOC resigns from Queens megadevelopment steering committee

arrow_forward_ios
Loading...