Here’s why American cities are safe from housing bubble speculation

Despite housing crises in San Francisco, LA and New York, we don't live in bubbles

Oct.October 01, 2017 12:29 PM

No American cities made USB’s annual “bubble risk” index this year. (Pixabay)

No American cities made UBS’s annual “bubble risk” index this year, though several of cities like San Francisco, LA, and, of course, New York are in the midst of local housing crises. Here’s how the Swiss bank’s index assessed them:

The case for San Francisco

Even though the city saw real prices go up by 65 percent since 2011 — 15 percent more than the average city UBS qualified as a bubble risk — the Swiss bank isn’t concerned about the tech town. It’s overvalued, but its booming tech companies, and the strong local economy that accompanies them, means San Fran’s soaring prices are unlikely to crash suddenly.

Ditto for LA

Though prices have climbed by 45 percent since 2012, Los Angeles’ star-studded local economy shows no signs of faltering, so UBS isn’t worried — despite LA being well above the national average increase for U.S. home prices, which currently is hovering at 23 percent.

New York’s mixed bag

Here’s the good news for buyers: New York is “fairly valued,” according to the Swiss bankers’ assessment of the city, which, even they admit, is “one of the most expensive and unaffordable markets in the world.” For four quarters in a row, New York prices rose less than 3 percent and have only risen 10 percent since 2013.

The bad news: if you’re actually working in New York, salaries are not increasing enough to make a difference. The average income went up by only 7 percent since 2013; so, if you couldn’t afford prices then, you still can’t now. The report also notes rising costs associated with financing and a decline in population as factors hampering demand.

Then there’s the issue of high-end units not selling. Since 2015, deals in the luxury market have “declined considerably,” according to the report, and average selling time has doubled in comparison to 2013.

The combination of an oversupply of luxury units, too-low local salaries and the still yet-to-come units in development, lead UBS to conclude their report by observing that “buyers will likely require additional discounts from developers.”

[UBS] — E.K. Hudson

Related Articles

With a cooling trade war, stocks perform well, including real estate. (Credit: iStock)

Real estate stocks push up this week as U.S.-China trade tensions ease

416 West 25th Street and Maverick Real Estate Partners principal David Aviram (Credit: Google Maps and LinkedIn)

Chelsea landlord claims “predatory” lender is charging a crippling interest rate as punishment after losing foreclosure case

A rendering of 165 Broome Street (Credit: Handel Architects)

Nonprofit plans affordable housing development near Essex Crossing

250th Issue

The Real Deal celebrates 250 issues

From left: Publisher and founder Amir Korangy, Editor-in-chief Stuart Elliott and VP of Corporate Development Yoav Barilan

TRD’s founders share war stories from over the years

56 Leonard Street (Credit: iStock)

He invested more than $130M into 4 Manhattan condos. Now he’s taking a hit

 NYCHA CEO Gregory Russ and NYCHA houses (Credit: Minneapolis Public Housing Authority and Getty Images)

NYCHA head: Agency now needs $40B in repairs

Due to relatively high income levels and low transportation costs, New York City is the eight most affordable of 20 major cities (Credit: iStock)

NYC is the 8th most affordable big city in America*