Bauhouse sues Herrick Feinstein again, seeks $270M over Sutton Place ‘scheme’

Previous malpractice suit was dismissed in December

TRD New York /
May.May 21, 2019 05:30 PM
From left: A rendering of 3 Sutton Place, Richard R. Kalikow and Joseph Beninati

From left: A rendering of 3 Sutton Place, Richard R. Kalikow and Joseph Beninati

Bauhouse just won’t bow out.

Two years after losing control of the development at 3 Sutton Place to lender Gamma Real Estate, Bauhouse Group’s Joseph Beninati filed another lawsuit against law firm Herrick Feinstein on Monday seeking at least $270 million in damages, Crain’s reported.

There was an “inherent unconsentable conflict” between Bauhouse and Gamma, the complaint alleges, “due to the close personal relationship between the Kalikow Attorney and Kalikow Lender, as they were cousins and the Lender had helped the Attorney attain his job at the Herrick firm.”

The “Kalikow Attorney” is Herrick partner Richard R. Kalikow, while the “Kalikow lender” is N. Richard Kalikow, chairman and CEO of Gamma Real Estate. Beninati alleges that the two conspired to persuade him to take on a loan from Gamma, rather from another lender, Inbursa Bank.

The $270 million in damages represents Bauhouse’s estimate of the peak value of the development.

The latest lawsuit is the third in which Bauhouse has alleged a “loan-to-own” scheme on Gamma’s part. The first was a 2016 lawsuit against Gamma prior to the foreclosure, which was mostly rejected – although a judge did rule that the interest rate on the loan violated usury statutes, and would be reduced to the statutory maximum.

Gamma subsequently took control of the property for $86 million at a foreclosure auction. Soon after, a judge found that Bauhouse’s principals were personally on the hook for $24 million in loans because of personal guarantees they had signed, and Beninati’s partner Chris Jones fled to Spain a few months later.

Beninati then sued Herrick Feinstein last year for malpractice, but those claims were dismissed in December. Herrick says the latest lawsuit largely rehashes the same accusations.

“We believe that the new action is essentially based on the same facts and legal theories that the court already rejected; they lack merit and we expect this lawsuit to be dismissed,” Herrick said in an emailed statement to Crain’s. [Crain’s]Kevin Sun


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios

Real estate stocks push up this week as U.S.-China trade tensions ease

416 West 25th Street and Maverick Real Estate Partners principal David Aviram (Credit: Google Maps and LinkedIn)

Chelsea landlord claims “predatory” lender is charging a crippling interest rate as punishment after losing foreclosure case

Joel Schreiber (Credit: Shir Stein and Wikipedia)

WeWork’s first investor used his stock as collateral. Now his lenders are suing him

California passes landmark rent control law

Cammeby's International Group founder Rubin Schron and, from top: 194-05 67th Avenue, 189-15 73rd Avenue and 64-05 186th Lane (Credit: Google Maps)

Ruby Schron lands $500M refi for sprawling Queens apartment portfolio

163 North 6th Street and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange Bull (Credit: Google Maps, Wikipedia)

Joel Gluck’s Israeli bond issuance falls through as Williamsburg rental project faces financing crunch

NYC’s foreign investment landscape in the era of trade wars and heightened nationalism

Larry Silverstein and the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (Credit: Getty Images)

Institutional investors swarm Silverstein’s new TASE bonds

arrow_forward_ios