Bauhouse sues Herrick Feinstein again, seeks $270M over Sutton Place ‘scheme’

Previous malpractice suit was dismissed in December

May.May 21, 2019 05:30 PM
From left: A rendering of 3 Sutton Place, Richard R. Kalikow and Joseph Beninati

From left: A rendering of 3 Sutton Place, Richard R. Kalikow and Joseph Beninati

Bauhouse just won’t bow out.

Two years after losing control of the development at 3 Sutton Place to lender Gamma Real Estate, Bauhouse Group’s Joseph Beninati filed another lawsuit against law firm Herrick Feinstein on Monday seeking at least $270 million in damages, Crain’s reported.

There was an “inherent unconsentable conflict” between Bauhouse and Gamma, the complaint alleges, “due to the close personal relationship between the Kalikow Attorney and Kalikow Lender, as they were cousins and the Lender had helped the Attorney attain his job at the Herrick firm.”

The “Kalikow Attorney” is Herrick partner Richard R. Kalikow, while the “Kalikow lender” is N. Richard Kalikow, chairman and CEO of Gamma Real Estate. Beninati alleges that the two conspired to persuade him to take on a loan from Gamma, rather from another lender, Inbursa Bank.

The $270 million in damages represents Bauhouse’s estimate of the peak value of the development.

The latest lawsuit is the third in which Bauhouse has alleged a “loan-to-own” scheme on Gamma’s part. The first was a 2016 lawsuit against Gamma prior to the foreclosure, which was mostly rejected – although a judge did rule that the interest rate on the loan violated usury statutes, and would be reduced to the statutory maximum.

Gamma subsequently took control of the property for $86 million at a foreclosure auction. Soon after, a judge found that Bauhouse’s principals were personally on the hook for $24 million in loans because of personal guarantees they had signed, and Beninati’s partner Chris Jones fled to Spain a few months later.

Beninati then sued Herrick Feinstein last year for malpractice, but those claims were dismissed in December. Herrick says the latest lawsuit largely rehashes the same accusations.

“We believe that the new action is essentially based on the same facts and legal theories that the court already rejected; they lack merit and we expect this lawsuit to be dismissed,” Herrick said in an emailed statement to Crain’s. [Crain’s]Kevin Sun

Related Articles

With a cooling trade war, stocks perform well, including real estate. (Credit: iStock)

Real estate stocks push up this week as U.S.-China trade tensions ease

416 West 25th Street and Maverick Real Estate Partners principal David Aviram (Credit: Google Maps and LinkedIn)

Chelsea landlord claims “predatory” lender is charging a crippling interest rate as punishment after losing foreclosure case

Greystar CEO Bob Faith and the Parkside Place Apartments in Cary, North Carolina (Credit: Greystar and Apartments)

What Greystar’s belief in multifamily says about the health of the economy

South Carolina town puts moratorium on development (Credit: iStock)

The high cost of low taxes: South Carolina town bans all development for 16 months

Rupert Murdoch and David Doctorow (Credit: Getty Images, iStock)

News Corp. looks to Opcity lead-generation to boost real estate services biz

Clockwise from the bottom left: The Eugene (435 West 31st Street), the Hudson Yards observation deck condominium and 555 Tenth Avenue (Credit: Google Maps)

West Side story: Manhattan’s largest January real estate loans

Selina Hotel at 516- 518 West 27th Street and Adam Neumann (Credit: Google Maps, Getty Images)

Lender moves to foreclose on site of NYC hotel linked to Adam Neumann, Mexican magnate

Brookfield Property Partners CEO Brian Kingston (Credit: Brookfield, iStock)

2020 “will get a little better” after peak year for retail bankruptcies: Brookfield