“Indentured landlord” in rent-reg lawsuit vents at politicians

Owner asks elected officials why he should subsidize tenant’s vacation

New York /
Nov.November 21, 2019 03:45 PM
The lawsuit will likely take several years to reach the Supreme Court, if it ever does. (Credit: iStock)

The lawsuit will likely take several years to reach the Supreme Court, if it ever does. (Credit: iStock)

One of the property owners highlighted in a federal lawsuit challenging the new rent law isn’t waiting for the lawyers to make his case.

Bryan Liff, who was prevented by the legislation from evicting tenants from his newly purchased Manhattan building so his family could move in, has been hectoring at least seven elected officials by email about the law. In one message reviewed by The Real Deal, Liff asks several prominent legislators whether he must “subsidize” his rent-stabilized tenant’s vacation.

The tenant, according to the landlord’s email, requested to sublet her apartment while she traveled.

“By the nature of the tenant being rent-stabilized we as landlords are already directly subsidizing her rent, are we now required to subsidize her vacations?” the message reads. (The answer: no.)

“If the state would like to buy the property and assume its management, I would be happy to sell it to you,” Liff later wrote them. “Otherwise this act has forced us into being indentured landlords whose tenants hold all the power.”

The messages were shared by State Sen. Julia Salazar, a supporter of the rent law, on the condition that its six other recipients, which included colleagues and high-ranking members of the Cuomo administration, not be identified.

Liff told TRD that he did not coordinate with the Rent Stabilization Association, the Community Housing Improvement Program or any other plaintiffs in the lawsuit. The landlord, whose circumstance is featured in the suit although he’s not a party to it, said rent-stabilized tenants should not be allowed to sublet their apartments. The law allows subletting but only with the landlord’s permission.

Liff’s messages also called for means-testing regulated tenants, who he said are living in “subsidized housing.” The new law did away with a provision allowing landlords to evict high-income tenants from rent-regulated units. The legislation severely curtailed owners’ ability to raise rents, but did not provide a subsidy, which is a payment or tax break from the government.

Liff’s situation is featured extensively in the lawsuit, one of several challenging the new statute. According to the complaint, Liff and his wife purchased an Upper West Side building for $2.1 million in March. After spending more than $25,000 on architectural and engineering fees, they were unable to take over the six of the eight rent-stabilized units as planned. The number of apartments allowed for an owner’s personal use was limited to one by the law enacted in June.

The complaint also alleges that, were the Liffs to sell their property, it would fetch only a fraction of the former value because of the new law.

“When the government decrees that a tenant’s rights take precedence over the owner’s own use and occupancy of a unit or building, the government has effectively seized that property to the same extent as if it had taken over the building as a government housing facility,” the complaint reads.

The lawsuit will likely take several years to reach the Supreme Court, if it ever does.

RSA and CHIP, along with seven individual landlords, filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleging that the new law violates the U.S. Constitution’s Fifth Amendment — which bars the taking of private property without “just compensation” — and the Fourteenth Amendment’s due process clause.

“Our legal efforts are on behalf of a broad and diverse group of property owners and are focused on a constitutional challenge to the law,” CHIP said in a statement. “But we fully understand the rationale for individuals to want to mitigate the damage these laws are inflicting and we support an owner who wants to be able to live in their own property.”

And Frank Ricci, director of government affairs for RSA, said in a statement, “There’s a fundamental difference between owning and renting. It goes to the heart of the physical takings argument we’re taking to think that someone who owns a property risked their own money, invested their own money, has less rights than a tenant.”


Related Articles

arrow_forward_ios
Estate Partners' David Aviram, FIA Capital Partners' David Goldwasser and Steve Croman (LinkedIn, Google Maps, Getty)
Steve Croman: I was duped by predatory lender
Steve Croman: I was duped by predatory lender
From left: McSam Hotel Group's Sam Chang and SL Green's Marc Holliday with 711 Seventh Avenue  (Getty, Google Mpas, SL Green)
Times Square hotel developer sues neighbors over delayed demolition
Times Square hotel developer sues neighbors over delayed demolition
 Justice Sandra Sciortino and Newburgh mayor Torrance Harvey (Facebook, Daniel Case, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons)
“Good cause eviction” struck down in Newburgh
“Good cause eviction” struck down in Newburgh
Rotem Rosen and Alex Sapir (Illustration by Kevin Cifuentes for The Real Deal with Getty Images)
Sapir and Rosen settle longstanding legal feud
Sapir and Rosen settle longstanding legal feud
A photo illustration of Paterson Mayor Andre Sayegh along with a rendering of the planned development at 305-319 Pennsylvania Avenue (Getty, HannaBS, CC BY-SA 4.0 - via Wikimedia Commons, Paterson City Council, Google Maps)
Judge upholds approval for 171-unit development in Paterson
Judge upholds approval for 171-unit development in Paterson
Attorney General Letitia James with 198 Scholes Street, 11 Gunther Place, 506 Dekalb Avenue and 65 Kent Avenue (Illustration by THe Real Deal with Getty, Google Maps)
Yoel Goldman’s All Year Management investigated by NY attorney general
Yoel Goldman’s All Year Management investigated by NY attorney general
(Illustration by The Real Deal with Getty)
Developer fires back as Saddle River blocks affordable housing
Developer fires back as Saddle River blocks affordable housing
560 Seventh Avenue and Sharif El-Gamal (Margaritaville Resorts; Getty)
Synagogue sues Sharif El-Gamal over missing space
Synagogue sues Sharif El-Gamal over missing space
arrow_forward_ios

The Deal's newsletters give you the latest scoops, fresh headlines, marketing data, and things to know within the industry.

Loading...